Aliases

2000-01-28 Thread Tom Reinertson
eceived: from unknown (HELO uswest.net) (166.70.155.10) by pop.slkc.uswest.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2000 03:46:46 - Sender: tom Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 20:46:44 -0700 From: Tom Reinertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.10

Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Tom Reinertson
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Vern Hart wrote: > I had planned on making two varieties of each slogan. One with the > Q-arrows logo (small, on the left front) and the slogan and Q-arrows > logo on the back (big). The second variation would be the same with > the dolphin logo substituted. Should I be bot

Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-29 Thread Tom Reinertson
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Vern Hart wrote: > I agree. The basic shirt is a Haynes Beefy-T, Heavyweight. > The sweatshirt option is a Jerzees 50/50 7.5 oz fleece. > The sweatshirt costs about $5 more. Beefy-T's are fine by me. Tom

Supervise directories

2000-02-29 Thread Tom Reinertson
I've got qmail 1.03 up and running just fine on my Caldera OpenLinux 2.3 system. But I wonder about all the "supervise" directories" that have appeared under my /var/qmail directories: $ ls /var/qmail alias bin boot control doc man queue rc supervise users Every directory under qmail

Re: Supervise directories

2000-02-29 Thread Tom Reinertson
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, you wrote: > Not normal. Sounds like you did "cd /var/qmail; svscan" instead of "cd > /var/qmail/supervise; svscan". > > Kill off all the qmail/supervise/svscan processes, delete the > supervise directories from everywhere but /var/qmail/supervise, check > your startup scrip

Lost Mail

2000-02-29 Thread Tom Reinertson
Oh-oh. I've been messing around with my mail system on my local workstation in order to retrieve mail from my old mail server (uswest.net) and from my new qmail server (s4rec.com) which is running qmail 1.03 on a Caldera OpenLinux 2.3 system. I thought I had everything working fine and things se

Re: Lost Mail

2000-03-01 Thread Tom Reinertson
Uwe, > Note that my knowledge of sendmail internals is quite limited. I wish > it to stay that way. My sentiments exactly. > btw: did you have netrape or emacs or any other mail reading program > running? If yes that one might have "stored" the missing mails somewhere. Nope. > > Feb 29 16:43: