True -- but that would require the countries the software manufacturers do business
in to relax their export regs. and allow for open encryption hooks in their tools.
Dave Sill wrote:
> >It's not even this complicated with 6.5. You click on the window whose text
> >you want to encrypt, click on
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 06:04:12PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
>> Use any version of PGP or "PGP for Windows" and use the clipboard encryption
>> features:
>> 1) select all text (Ctrl-A)
>> 2) "copy" (Ctrl-C)
>> 3) click on PGP tray icon
>> 4) click "
: RE: [offtopic?] RE: Encryption (was: Open letter)
Original Message From: Michael T. Babcock on Monday, July 31, 2000 3:04 PM
>> I would be signing my messages pgp, if I could, but I haven't gotten
ahold
>> of PGP 7 yet... and the earlier versions don't work on 2000.
>
>Use
Original Message From: Michael T. Babcock on Monday, July 31, 2000 3:04 PM
>> I would be signing my messages pgp, if I could, but I haven't gotten
ahold
>> of PGP 7 yet... and the earlier versions don't work on 2000.
>
>Use any version of PGP or "PGP for Windows" and use the clipboard
encryption
>
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 06:04:12PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> Use any version of PGP or "PGP for Windows" and use the clipboard encryption
> features:
> 1) select all text (Ctrl-A)
> 2) "copy" (Ctrl-C)
> 3) click on PGP tray icon
> 4) click "sign & encrypt"
> 5) enter password
> 6) click w
Potentially long, off-topic message: (follow-ups and/or flames probably best
kept private :)
"Ihnen, David" wrote:
> Would you consider PGP more than a low-effort? It would be zero effort if
> we weren't concerned about the privacy of our own secret keys, thus keeping
> them encrypted behind pa
