On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 04:13:44PM -0500,
Ben Beuchler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone familiar with any weirdness betwixt qmail and webboard mail
> servers?
My experience with webboard mail servers is that they are broken. They
don't accept <> as a valid envelope sender address. As far as
Quoting Ben Beuchler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 02:23:22PM -0700, Aaron L. Meehan wrote:
> > They are rejecting the NULL ("<>") sender address. Tell 'em to go
> > read RFC 821 and 1123!
>
> Ah HA! And I'm assuming qmail only uses NULL senders on bounces? As RFC
> 821 sugges
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 02:23:22PM -0700, Aaron L. Meehan wrote:
> Quoting Ben Beuchler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Connected to 209.46.71.115 but sender was rejected.
> > Remote host said: 501 Syntax Error
>
> They are rejecting the
Quoting Ben Beuchler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Connected to 209.46.71.115 but sender was rejected.
> Remote host said: 501 Syntax Error
They are rejecting the NULL ("<>") sender address. Tell 'em to go
read RFC 821 and 1123!
> Ho
this address, but the bounce
bounced!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Connected to 209.46.71.115 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 501 Syntax Error
However, when I manually try it, it works:
petra:~$ telnet 209.46.71.115 25
Trying 209.46.71.115...
Connected to 209.46.71.115.
Escape c
