Dan Newcombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As much as I hate sendmail, after this response I may just go back to it
>if this is what the qmail "community" is like.
Don't judge an entire community by the actions of one individual.
-Dave
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 09:46:26AM -0500, Dan Newcombe wrote:
> There is a patch to do MD5, so the users can securly send their password
> for POP and SMTP AUTH transactions.
Can't help with the other questions, as I am using my own model for
checkpassword, but the encoding schemes for POP3 APOP
Felix:
If you weren't correct most of the time, I would bust on you for being
tactless. But you are tactless, and usually correct.
cheers,
--Peter
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> Thus spake Dan Newcombe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > So, that is three patches I can think of that I
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 10:28:07PM -0500, Dan Newcombe wrote:
> Is this supposed to be humor?
>
> If you don't have a decent answer then either suggets a better solution or
> keep quiet.
>
> As much as I hate sendmail, after this response I may just go back to it
> if this is what the qmail "com
Is this supposed to be humor?
If you don't have a decent answer then either suggets a better solution or
keep quiet.
As much as I hate sendmail, after this response I may just go back to it
if this is what the qmail "community" is like.
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> Thus spak
Thus spake Dan Newcombe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> So, that is three patches I can think of that I need. Something has me
> worried that they are gonna start interferring.
Why don't you also add a web browser to checkpassword?
After all, everybody needs a web browser, right?
Sheesh.
Dan Newcombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, that is three patches I can think of that I need. Something has me
> worried that they are gonna start interferring.
A lot of things can be accomplished without patches, because qmail is so
modular.
> Is there a definitive way to:
>
> - allow
So, there is the wonderful checkpasswd util.
There is a patch which lets it work with the cdb databases (which correct
me if I'm wrong, but will let me have one user with 4000 mailboxes and
this should let each "virtual user" get to their own mail)
There is a patch to add PAM support for passw
