Re: applying big-todo patch

nes but isn't there an automated script I can run > that will do this for me? Where is this script? I've searched the archives > and while there's plenty of talk about the big-todo patch, nobody ever > mentions exactly what they did to apply it. Thanks a bunch. man patch Chris

Re: applying big-todo patch

Hi, > mentions exactly what they did to apply it. Thanks a bunch. man patch and if patch does not exist on your system: http://www.gnu.org/directory/patch.html claudio -- Claudio Nieder, Kanalweg 1, CH-8610 Uster, Tel +41 79 357 6743 yahoo messenger: clau

applying big-todo patch

? Where is this script? I've searched the archives and while there's plenty of talk about the big-todo patch, nobody ever mentions exactly what they did to apply it. Thanks a bunch.

Re: big-todo patch

Mehul Choksi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for instructions on applying big-todo patch. It’s > just a test server so I don need to worry about the existing queue. If you don't care about the contents of the queue, just stop qmail, remove /var/qmail/queue, cd to the

big-todo patch

Greetings, I am looking for instructions on applying big-todo patch.  It’s just a test server so I don need to worry about the existing queue. Would appreciate if some could help me or send me the link, which points to the instructions.   Thanks in Advance, Mehul.

big todo patch

doh, meant to send this to the list instead of just to russ :) disclaimer: some of what i'm talking about may be slightly off. if i'm not mistaken, the point of the big-todo patch is to keep the individual queue directories from containing a huge amount of files. the default qmail in

Re: Big Todo Patch

At 04:23 PM 11/11/99 -0800, Eric Huss wrote: >Does anyone have any empirical evidence that the Big Todo patch actually >improves performance? > >I tried a few tests, and didn't seem to find any difference in performance >between stock qmail and one that was patched. [...] >

Re: Big Todo Patch

Eric Huss writes: > Does anyone have any empirical evidence that the Big Todo patch actually > improves performance? Yes, but I don't have the numbers anymore. I provisioned two 486/66 Linux machines, one with and the other without. The one with got through a 10,000 todo queue

Big Todo Patch

Does anyone have any empirical evidence that the Big Todo patch actually improves performance? I tried a few tests, and didn't seem to find any difference in performance between stock qmail and one that was patched. One test included shutting down qmail, putting 5,000 messages (to

Re: Big-Todo patch

Check the mailing list archives for more detail. Qmailaserializes(?) message delivery from the queue if thereaare too many messages waiting to be processed into the queuea(listed as "still to be processed" in qmail-qstat).a> Can someone tell me what the big-todo-patch is? What d

Big-Todo patch

Hi Can someone tell me what the big-todo-patch is? What does is change/make better/optimize? greetings, Florian Pflug

Re: big-todo patch +queue-fix

:> just wondering if, after I applied the big-todo patch, I can still use the :> queue-fix program? : Matthew Harrell gave me the following patch. I have not tried it. Yeah, I use that patch and it seems to work fine for me. Let me know if you have any problems. -- Matthew H

Re: big-todo patch +queue-fix

> just wondering if, after I applied the big-todo patch, I can still use the > queue-fix program? > > Franky > Matthew Harrell gave me the following patch. I have not tried it. -Eric --- queue-fix-1.4/queue-fix.c-ori Tue Aug 17 09:43:58 1999 +++ queue-fix-1.4/queue-

big-todo patch +queue-fix

HI, just wondering if, after I applied the big-todo patch, I can still use the queue-fix program? Franky

Question on big-todo patch

Hi, My todo directory has grown to around 7000 files and I am considering using the big-todo patch. I have never used it Do I just stop qmail, apply the patch and reinstall or do I have to munge the queue. If I have to munge the queue, what is the magic incantation to keep exisiting messages

RE: question on big-todo patch

e shouldn't be any todo/117188 with the big-todo patch. One of the main things it does is subdivided the todo/ directory. -Sincerely, Fred (Frederik Lindberg, Infectious Diseases, WashU, St. Louis, MO, USA)

RE: question on big-todo patch

PM > To: QMail List > Subject: Re: question on big-todo patch > > > Lyndon Griffin writes: > > I just installed the big-todo patch on one of my servers, and > am running a > > mailing of around 350k names. I am frequently getting the > following error: > >

RE: question on big-todo patch

t; To: QMail List > Subject: Re: question on big-todo patch > > > Lyndon Griffin writes: > > I just installed the big-todo patch on one of my servers, and > am running a > > mailing of around 350k names. I am frequently getting the > following error: > > >

Re: question on big-todo patch

Lyndon Griffin writes: > I just installed the big-todo patch on one of my servers, and am running a > mailing of around 350k names. I am frequently getting the following error: > > find: cannot open queue/todo/117188: No such file or directory > find: cannot open queue/todo/

question on big-todo patch

I just installed the big-todo patch on one of my servers, and am running a mailing of around 350k names. I am frequently getting the following error: find: cannot open queue/todo/117188: No such file or directory find: cannot open queue/todo/117514: No such file or directory any idears

Missing piece of my big-todo patch

Bruce Guenter writes in private email, forwarded with permission: > While testing the performance of a big todo directory, I observed that > qmail-qstat miscounted the number of messages in the todo directory. > The following trivial patch needs to be added to yours. Thanks, Bruce. I'