Re: Building very large Qmail instalations...

2000-07-01 Thread Greg Cope
Brett Randall wrote: > > Well...I have a little 2c to chuck in as well > > I have just finished designing a system (and implementing it) for our > corporation that allows distributed e-mail across a city, with hundreds, > possibly thousands, of different locations either dialing up or being > pe

RE: Building very large Qmail instalations...

2000-06-30 Thread Andrew Richards
ing you buy from Sun... ;-) cheers, Andrew. -- From: Toens Bueker[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 June 2000 15:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Building very large Qmail instalations... Greg Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm one of the admins of a

Re: Building very large Qmail instalations...

2000-06-29 Thread Toens Bueker
Mike Denka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you, or anyone else who would care to join this discussion, please be > more specific re: "Suns filesystems and qmails file operations"? I've done a lot tweaking squid proxies (Sun U2) and therefore had a lot to do with filesystems. You can see the

Re: Building very large Qmail instalations...

2000-06-28 Thread Brett Randall
Well...I have a little 2c to chuck in as well I have just finished designing a system (and implementing it) for our corporation that allows distributed e-mail across a city, with hundreds, possibly thousands, of different locations either dialing up or being permanently connected to our main rela

RE: Building very large Qmail instalations...

2000-06-28 Thread Gustav Yeung
Title: RE: Building very large Qmail instalations... I am also tackling the same problem. My idea is to have a line of frontend servers load-balanced at network level and other line of servers solely taking care of storage. The mail servers would access the storage via NFS on a private

Re: Building very large Qmail instalations...

2000-06-28 Thread Russell Nelson
Greg Moeller writes: > Now, we called Sun, asking about a high capacity disk solution, one that might > help with the IO problems. (cache on the disk array to take care of all the > fsyncs Qmail does) > They told us that around 50k-60k mailboxes is about the limit of Qmail. They have no cl

RE: Building very large Qmail instalations...

2000-06-28 Thread Mike Denka
docs for more detail? Thanks, Mike > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Toens > Bueker > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 7:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Building very large Qmail instalations... > Impor

Re: Building very large Qmail instalations...

2000-06-28 Thread Toens Bueker
Greg Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm one of the admins of a largish Qmail installation (~60,000 mailboxes) > and the hardware we're running it on it near the limit. > (Sun Ultra 450, dual processor, A1000 storage array) > The system is very IO bound, sometimes with a load average of 20-2

Building very large Qmail instalations...

2000-06-27 Thread Greg Moeller
I'm one of the admins of a largish Qmail installation (~60,000 mailboxes) and the hardware we're running it on it near the limit. (Sun Ultra 450, dual processor, A1000 storage array) The system is very IO bound, sometimes with a load average of 20-25. (although usually between 3-8) Now, we called