Ben Beuchler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I *do* like it! I don't want to change it. I'm just trying to come up
>with reasonable arguments defending my position.
Feel free to change it, but if you do, be careful not to break QSBMF
(qmail-send bounce message format), which bounce parsers like th
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 09:12:46PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> Because it's the nearest to a suggestion to a standard that is:
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt
>
> It's well defined and polite.
>
> What part of this bounce is it that you don't like?
I *do* like it! I don't want to change
: Changing bounce message
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:55:44PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> The Powers That Be are making noises about not liking the text of qmail's
> bounce message. The whole "This is the qmail-send program at" thingy.
>
> I don't want to mess with
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:55:44PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> The Powers That Be are making noises about not liking the text of qmail's
> bounce message. The whole "This is the qmail-send program at" thingy.
>
> I don't want to mess with DJB's pristine code, so I would rather not
> change it.
The Powers That Be are making noises about not liking the text of qmail's
bounce message. The whole "This is the qmail-send program at" thingy.
I don't want to mess with DJB's pristine code, so I would rather not
change it. Are there any good, concrete reasons to leave it alone? Or am
I being
