On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 03:43:20PM -0700, Greg White wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 04:14:16PM -0500, Proc Meminfo wrote:
> > Hey, I am receiving the following errors while doing 'make setup check':
> >
> > dns.o: In function 'resolve':
> > dns.o(.text+0xf8): undefined reference to '__dn_expand
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 04:14:16PM -0500, Proc Meminfo wrote:
> Hey, I am receiving the following errors while doing 'make setup check':
>
> dns.o: In function 'resolve':
> dns.o(.text+0xf8): undefined reference to '__dn_expand'
> dns.o: In function 'findname':
> dns.o(.text+0x1bc): undefined ref
Hey, I am receiving the following errors while doing 'make setup check':
dns.o: In function 'resolve':
dns.o(.text+0xf8): undefined reference to '__dn_expand'
dns.o: In function 'findname':
dns.o(.text+0x1bc): undefined reference to '__dn_expand'
dns.o(.text+0x24c): undefined reference to '__dn_e
* Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010709 09:37]:
>
> I have apply to compile ezmlm-0.53 + idx-0.40 with
> and such error has been reported
1. You are on the wrong list. Consult http://ezmlm.org/
2. In the meantime, check this: http://untroubled.org/ezmlm-browse/
Hello
I have apply to compile ezmlm-0.53 + idx-0.40 with
and such error has been reported
Please help fix it:
./load ezmlm-list subdb.a fs.a getconf.o slurpclose.o slurp.o \
strerr.a getln.a getopt.a substdio.a stralloc.a \
alloc.a error.a open.a str.a case.a `head -1 conf-sqlld`
./compile ezml
* Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010524 14:45]:
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:12:23PM -0400, Ed Weinberg wrote:
> > I am havingompile problems compiling daemontools-0.70 on RH 7.1. I have
>·
> This is a FAQ. With Linux Kernel 2.4 an inlcude path is broken. Search teh
> archives for time.h .
>
Edit the tai64nlocal.c remove the "sys/" from #include "sys/time.h" and
recompile.
KF
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:23 AM
Subject: Compile problems with compilat
Lordy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is a well known problem and I think it is produced by a change
>in Glibc, as far as I can remember. However, a little change in Line 2
>of tai64nlocal.c should make things work:
>change "#include " to "#include "
This is great. You are at a customer's site
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:12:23PM -0400, Ed Weinberg wrote:
> I am havingompile problems compiling daemontools-0.70 on RH 7.1. I have
This is a FAQ. With Linux Kernel 2.4 an inlcude path is broken. Search teh
archives for time.h .
Why the hell did they need to change include pathes?!
--
* He
]>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:23 PM
Subject: Compile problems with compilation of daemontools-0.70 on RH 7.1
> I am havingompile problems compiling daemontools-0.70 on RH 7.1. I have
> already compiled Qmail, Checkpassword, and several other packages, just
this
> one is giving me a
I am havingompile problems compiling daemontools-0.70 on RH 7.1. I have
already compiled Qmail, Checkpassword, and several other packages, just this
one is giving me a problem. Are there known problems doing this with 7.1?
Anyone have a work-arround? Here is the last few lines while "make" is
* Kieran Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010417 12:33]:
> I dont think it is qmail that is causing the problem, possibly a
> broken system (Redhat 6.2/i386) ?
RedHat indeed qualifies as a broken system. But not in this respect.
> In file included from /usr/include/fcntl.h:33,
> from
Hello,
I am trying to compile qmail on an existing server we have, although I am
getting an error during the compile
make: *** [open_append.o] Error 1
Full details below.
I dont think it is qmail that is causing the problem, possibly a broken
system (Redhat 6.2/i386) ?
[root@neon qmail-1.03]#
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 12:45:58PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:46:30AM -0300, wrote:
> > I've seen the standard qmail compilation flags are just "-O2".
> >
> > Does anybody tried any other level of optimization like
> >
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:46:30AM -0300, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've seen the standard qmail compilation flags are just "-O2".
>
> Does anybody tried any other level of optimization like
> "-O6... -fomit-frame-pointer... -DCPU=686..." ? What would be t
Hi all,
I've seen the standard qmail compilation flags are just "-O2".
Does anybody tried any other level of optimization like
"-O6... -fomit-frame-pointer... -DCPU=686..." ? What would be the benefits
of compiling with these flags ? Is this safe ?
I'm using e
Hello
I have problems with qmail compilation on Solaris 2.6
with gcc-2.95.
First I dont now how set gcc as default compiler on
Solaris - please help with it!
Second - if I have manually change compiler to gcc
such error has been occured:
./load qmail-remote control.o constmap.o
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Peter Green wrote:
> I've found that, occasionally, installing the kernel-source RPM after
> the kernel-headers RPM breaks stuff. Re-install the kernel-headers RPM
> (rpm -Uhv --force kernel-headers-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm) and try again.
This is pretty much what happened. Thanks.
also sprach nospam:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
>
> > Installing the package kernel-headers will suffice. It's not necessary
> > to install the whole kernel source tree just to compile.
>
> I have those, too: kernel-headers-2.2.16-3
I've found that, occasionally, installing the
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 09:29:57PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
} On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Ben Beuchler wrote:
}
} > Do you have the linux source tree installed on your box? I'm guessing
} > not.
}
} Yes, I do: kernel-source-2.2.16-3.
Does this symbolic link exist:
linux% ls -l /usr/include/linux
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> Do you have the linux source tree installed on your box? I'm guessing
> not.
Yes, I do: kernel-source-2.2.16-3.
--
Todd A. Jacobs
Senior Network Consultant
On 02-Jul-2000, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 08:37:24PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> > /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory
> > make: *** [txt.o] Error 1
>
> Do you have the linux source tree installed on your box? I'm guessing
> not.
Install
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
> Installing the package kernel-headers will suffice. It's not necessary
> to install the whole kernel source tree just to compile.
I have those, too: kernel-headers-2.2.16-3
--
Todd A. Jacobs
Senior Network Consultant
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 09:30:41PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
>
> > Installing the package kernel-headers will suffice. It's not necessary
> > to install the whole kernel source tree just to compile.
>
> I have those, too: kernel-headers-2.2.16-3
W
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 08:37:24PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory
> make: *** [txt.o] Error 1
Do you have the linux source tree installed on your box? I'm guessing
not.
Ben
--
The spectre of a polity controlled by the fad
I get the following errors when attempting to compile rblsmtpd-0.70 on Red
Hat 6.2 running kernel 2.2.16-3. Any ideas about how I can get this to
compile?
In file included from /usr/include/bits/posix1_lim.h:126,
from /usr/include/limits.h:30,
from
/usr/lib/gcc-
At 11:41 AM +0800 4/27/00, Isaiah Chua wrote:
>hi folks,
>
>I'm not sure if this has been asked before, but searching the FAQs
>didn't produce anything, so I assume it could be new.
>
>I'm trying to compile qMail on our RedHat 6.2 server and have
>downloaded all the necessary files for qMail to
hi folks,
I'm not sure if this has been asked before, but searching the
FAQs didn't produce anything, so I assume it could be new.
I'm trying to compile qMail on our RedHat 6.2 server and have
downloaded all the necessary files for qMail to be compiled and take over
sendmail.
However, w
try to do ./config-fast yourhost.dname.top
- Original Message -
From: Stephen F. Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: Compilation
Marcos dos santos Costa wrote:
>
> Dear Friends (again),
>
> We
add hosts to locals or virtualdomains!
>
> Now, I Ask. There are some errors on this compilation, or not?
This looks in order to me...
-Stephen-
ls to /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts...
Now qmail will refuse to accept SMTP messages except to those hosts.
Make sure to change rcpthosts if you add hosts to locals or virtualdomains!
Now, I Ask. There are some errors on this compilation, or not?
Frederiko Costa
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Hi all,
I have downloaded qmail-1.03+patches-12.src.rpm from the site
http://em.ca/~bruceg. I have applied all the patches given. I have created
the uids. Then I compiled the qmail using "make setup check". Then I got the
following error.
[root@server1 qmail-1.03]# make setup check
./load auto-st
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 04:55:59PM -0300, Erico Augusto Bettoni wrote:
> I'm trying to compile qmail-1.03 on a solaris 2.5.1 with gcc-2.95.2 and
> bintuils-2.9.1 (ld). I've adjusted conf-cc and conf-ld:
>
> conf-cc:
> gcc -02
typo. -O2, not -02.
> Users and groups are created and /var/qmail
I'm trying to compile qmail-1.03 on a solaris 2.5.1 with gcc-2.95.2 and
bintuils-2.9.1 (ld). I've adjusted conf-cc and conf-ld:
conf-cc:
gcc -02
conf-ld:
ld
Users and groups are created and /var/qmail too.
Both of them are the GNU one's.
But I'm getting the error below dur
Hello,
I am trying to install Qmail 1.03 on a machine running Solaris 7 using
the gcc compiler.When I try to compile Qmail with 'make setup check' I
get the following errors. Please try and help me since I need to replace
Sendmail as soon as possible. Thanks in advance.
rm -f trysalen.o
./com
Hi,
I'm sorry if this is out of the limits of the list, but I couldn't find
any list for SQWebmail...
After I ran the .configure like this:
./configure --with-vchkpw=yes --enable-maxpurge=30
--with-htmllibdir=/mail/webmail
--enable-cgibindir=/usr/local/apache/cgi-bin --enable-hostname=webmail
-
36 matches
Mail list logo
