Denial of service process table attacks

1999-02-23 Thread John Conover
On http://lwn.net/daily/ptable.html is a description of denial of service process table attacks. Am I correct that tcpserver limits fork() calls to a specified number, and therefore alleviates the situation? Thanks, John -- John Conover, 631 Lamont Ct., Campbell, CA., 95008

Re: Denial of service process table attacks

1999-02-23 Thread Mark Delany
At 05:31 23/02/99 -, you wrote: On http://lwn.net/daily/ptable.html is a description of denial of service process table attacks. Am I correct that tcpserver limits fork() calls to a specified number, and therefore alleviates the situation? Correct. As long as you run all of your services via

Re: Denial of service process table attacks

1999-02-23 Thread Scott Lystig Fritchie
"md" == Mark Delany [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: md Whilst some inetd implementations have crude forms of DOS md protection (initially created for other reasons) I'm not aware of md too many that protect against concurrency - most do it by rate. Heh. If I may take a slight detour to tell an

Re: Denial of service process table attacks

1999-02-23 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Mark Delany wrote: At 05:31 23/02/99 -, you wrote: On http://lwn.net/daily/ptable.html is a description of denial of service process table attacks. Am I correct that tcpserver limits fork() calls to a specified number, and therefore alleviates the situation