On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 04:19:21PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Charles Leeds writes:
> > We were audited and one of the findings was that our qmail server allowed
> > addresses with the pipe symbol in them, which was reported in our audit as a
> > bad practice.
>
> Sounds like a good time t
Charles Leeds writes:
> We were audited and one of the findings was that our qmail server allowed
> addresses with the pipe symbol in them, which was reported in our audit as a
> bad practice.
Sounds like a good time to pick new auditors.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelso
On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 12:43:59AM +0100, Martin Lesser wrote:
> "Charles Leeds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We were audited and one of the findings was that our qmail server allowed
> > addresses with the pipe symbol in them, which was reported in our audit as a
> > bad practice.
>
> IIRC
"Charles Leeds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We were audited and one of the findings was that our qmail server allowed
> addresses with the pipe symbol in them, which was reported in our audit as a
> bad practice.
IIRC this test is sendmail-specific. I.e. Nessus reports problems with
the pipe s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31 Jan 00, at 16:09, Charles Leeds wrote:
> We were audited and one of the findings was that our qmail server
> allowed addresses with the pipe symbol in them, which was reported in
> our audit as a bad practice.
Why exactly? Unless you stuff the
Qmail Gurus,
We were audited and one of the findings was that our qmail server allowed
addresses with the pipe symbol in them, which was reported in our audit as a
bad practice.
Is there any way to block email addresses (sender or recipient) with the
pipe symbol in them via configuration files,
