On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Niall R. Murphy wrote:
> >I personally use vanilla qmail. It is -not- necessary to patch
> >it.
>
>I was under the impression bigdns allowed qmail to send to sites that it
>would otherwise have problems resolving MX for?
>
>Niall
This problem is very picky about the mac
On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 01:07:56PM +0100, Hans Sandsdalen wrote:
> vanilla qmail? What is that? And where di I find it?
"Vanilla" is an English expression meaning that it's just the plain,
unaltered version. I believe it has its origin in ice cream flavors.
You can order "plain vanilla", or vani
"Niall R. Murphy" wrote:
>
>>I personally use vanilla qmail. It is -not- necessary to patch
>>it.
>
> I was under the impression bigdns allowed qmail to send to sites that it
> would otherwise have problems resolving MX for?
>
> Niall
> --
> Niall Richard Murphy: System Operator, Irela
>I personally use vanilla qmail. It is -not- necessary to patch
>it.
I was under the impression bigdns allowed qmail to send to sites that it
would otherwise have problems resolving MX for?
Niall
--
Niall Richard Murphy: System Operator, Ireland On-Line
--
They said, "You have a blue g
Hi folks,
I'm wondering if there's a recommended list of patches that should be
applied to any new qmail installation. I have unpacked Bruces' RPM
and looked at the patch list there, and from those it seems as if
the following should be applied to any installation:
big-dns
big-todo
bind-interfa
