Re: Henning Brauer's reply

2000-11-28 Thread Henning Brauer
Am Dienstag, 28. November 2000 07:28 schrieb Chris Olson: > > > You should have read a least the documentation before wasting bandwidth > > > and our time. > > I did read the documentation, but this was something I could not find > > any documentation on, or else I didn't know where to look. I fo

Re: Henning Brauer's reply

2000-11-28 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 01:38:24 -0600 From: Chris Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Since we were on the subject of wasted bandwidth; I've been reading this thread about 'Secrets and lies' lately. Exactly what purpose does this subject serve on this list? There are probably lots of clev

Re: Henning Brauer's reply

2000-11-27 Thread Chris Olson
Andy Bradford wrote: > to qmail and linux and possibly the whole *NIX mentality I'm sure you > have a handful. Did you suddenly inherit someone else's job? Oh, I most certainly did. Ask me anything you want to know about WIN NT and I can answer your questions. I'm brand new to UNIX, and I'm

Re: Henning Brauer's reply

2000-11-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Chris Olson on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:28:26 CST: > I believe I'm no more braindead than you are. At least I have the > common courtesy to not post a derogatory statement like this on the > list, nor would I even send a private email to anyone containing a Granted, it is pretty rude to se

Henning Brauer's reply

2000-11-27 Thread Chris Olson
Henning Brauer wrote: > how braindead are you? I believe I'm no more braindead than you are. At least I have the common courtesy to not post a derogatory statement like this on the list, nor would I even send a private email to anyone containing a statement like this. Especially when the subje