>Ok, any constructive tips besides the mud-throwing?
Here's something simple, assuming you don't mind a little patch. In
qmail-smtpd.c, replace the addrallowed function with the following:
int addrallowed()
{
int r;
int i,seenAt = 0;
r = rcpthosts(addr.s,str_len(addr.s));
if (r =
Johan Almqvist wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 11:55:32AM -0400, John R. Levine wrote:
> > >(The reason for this is that all machines that accept mail with more than
> > >one @ or % get their port 25 locked from the outside world by campus
> > >network administration...)
> >
> > It'd probably
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 12:18:51PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> >Pardon my ignorance, but why would one want more than one '@' in an
> >address,
>
> Sendmail used it to implement routing. E.g., user@host1@host2 meant
> send the message to host2, who will deliver it to user@host1.
>
> >and why woul
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 11:55:32AM -0400, John R. Levine wrote:
> >(The reason for this is that all machines that accept mail with more than
> >one @ or % get their port 25 locked from the outside world by campus
> >network administration...)
>
> It'd probably be easier to figure out which host t
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 11:08:35AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 11:57:51AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
>
> > Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >(The reason for this is that all machines that accept mail with more than
> > >one @ or % get their port 25 locked f
Ben Beuchler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 11:57:51AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
>
>> Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >(The reason for this is that all machines that accept mail with more than
>> >one @ or % get their port 25 locked from the outside world by ca
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 11:57:51AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >(The reason for this is that all machines that accept mail with more than
> >one @ or % get their port 25 locked from the outside world by campus
> >network administration...)
>
> Just in
Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>(The reason for this is that all machines that accept mail with more than
>one @ or % get their port 25 locked from the outside world by campus
>network administration...)
Just in case you weren't aware of this: your campus network
administration is stu
>(The reason for this is that all machines that accept mail with more than
>one @ or % get their port 25 locked from the outside world by campus
>network administration...)
It'd probably be easier to figure out which host they do their lame
mail testing from, and tell tcpserver to reject connecti
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 05:53:42PM +0200, Johan Almqvist wrote:
[snip]
>
> (The reason for this is that all machines that accept mail with more than
> one @ or % get their port 25 locked from the outside world by campus
> network administration...)
Bring out the spiky LART/cluestick then. Really
Hi
I'm running qmail installed from Bruce Gunthers rpm and I'm very happy
with that. However, I will have to install a patch that disallows the use
of more than one @ sign (or % sign) directly in the smtpd RCPT TO: phase.
How can I achieve that without breaking everything else?
(The reason for t
11 matches
Mail list logo
