Russ Allbery writes:
Russ Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately for the legitimate users, dialup users have proven
themselves untrustworthy, because they are at the moment of connection
anonymous. How can they generate the necessary trust? Well, for one,
by having a
So many misconceptions, so little time...
On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 05:22:47AM -0500, Cris Daniluk wrote:
}
} You assume an ISP would do this. Really? That's an awful lot of work for
} something an Inbox filter would stop. And what's to stop someone from buying a
} static IP from their ISP with
Russell Nelson wrote:
Mike Holling writes:
Exactly. The implicit assumption being promoted here is that an ISP's
mail server is somehow more "legitimate" than an arbitrary mailserver on
the Internet. As Russ has just demonstrated, there is quite a bit of
legitimate mail transacted
On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 05:22:47AM -0500, Cris Daniluk wrote:
And what's to stop someone from buying a
static IP from their ISP with its own lovely domain and spamming the world
freely?
The economics of static IP discourage it. ISPs in the U.S. often
charge $200-300 in setup fees for static
Tim Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 2 February 1999 at 13:05:26 -0500
On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 05:22:47AM -0500, Cris Daniluk wrote:
And what's to stop someone from buying a
static IP from their ISP with its own lovely domain and spamming the world
freely?
The economics of
