Karl Vogel writes:
> ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/mail/imap.vs.pop
>
>The author argues strongly for IMAP.
There are problems whose solution space does not even begin to allow
IMAP to get its nose into the tent.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sell
>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2000 08:55:23 -0700,
>> "Steven M. Klass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
S> Sorry to tread on holy ground, but which is better.
This paper is the best summary I've seen:
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/mail/imap.vs.pop
Message Access Paradigms and Protocols
Terry Gr
At 8:55 AM -0700 7/13/00, Steven M. Klass wrote:
>Hello all
>
> Sorry to tread on holy ground, but which is better. Some
>company info.. Only a few of us travel, most of us want to remotely
>log in, and see if we have any mail. Everyone accesses mail locally
>at work - obviously..
The
Hello all
Sorry to tread on holy ground, but which is better. Some company
info.. Only a few of us travel, most of us want to remotely log in, and
see if we have any mail. Everyone accesses mail locally at work - obviously..
Thanks
Steven M. Klass
Systems Administrator
Andigilog
