In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
VERP-formatted envelope senders. And qmail would collate remote
deliveries by hostname, and dump all copies of a piece of email to all
the recipients at once. I have customers for whom that would be an
incredibly good win.
Of course
Thus spake Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
> VERP-formatted envelope senders. And qmail would collate remote
> deliveries by hostname, and dump all copies of a piece of email to all
> the recipients at once. I have c
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 07:44:31PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> Thus spake Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
> > VERP-formatted envelope senders. And qmail would collate remote
> > deliveries by hostname
Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thus spake Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
> > VERP-formatted envelope senders.
>
> Doesn't qmail-qmtpd accept VERPs?
Yes, but it's not require
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 08:22:48PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thus spake Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
> > > VERP-formatted envelope senders.
&g
