Thus spake Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
VERP-formatted envelope senders. And qmail would collate remote
deliveries by hostname, and dump all copies of a piece of email to all
the recipients at once. I have customers for whom
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 07:44:31PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
Thus spake Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
VERP-formatted envelope senders. And qmail would collate remote
deliveries by hostname, and dump all copies
Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thus spake Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
VERP-formatted envelope senders.
Doesn't qmail-qmtpd accept VERPs?
Yes, but it's not required by the QMTP protocol. It's just
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 08:22:48PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thus spake Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
VERP-formatted envelope senders.
Doesn't qmail-qmtpd accept VERPs?
Yes
In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
VERP-formatted envelope senders. And qmail would collate remote
deliveries by hostname, and dump all copies of a piece of email to all
the recipients at once. I have customers for whom that would be an
incredibly good win.
Of course
