Does anyone know if this behaviour persists in Mozilla?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org
Russell Nelson wrote:
> Petr Novotny writes:
> > Well, yeah. "+OK" field is mandatory, the rest is optional and can
> > be anything. Netscape is brain-dead to parse the comment and try
> > to make anything of
Petr Novotny writes:
> Well, yeah. "+OK" field is mandatory, the rest is optional and can
> be anything. Netscape is brain-dead to parse the comment and try
> to make anything of it.
Yup. This is 100% Netscape brain damage. They can and should have
gotten the information from a different c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 Jul 00, at 10:54, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> Are there any downsides to using the Netscape Messenger progress
> patch?
You're supporting broken technology.
> In other words, does it violate the standards in such a way as
> to potentially bre
Are there any downsides to using the Netscape Messenger progress patch?
In other words, does it violate the standards in such a way as to
potentially break any other clients?
Reminder of what patch does:
replaces "okay();" in qmail-pop3d.c with
puts("+OK ");
put(strnum,fmt_ulong(strnum,m[i].s
