RE: ANNOUNCE: qmail now works with the diet libc

2001-06-07 Thread Van Liedekerke Franky
Just wondering if this is the complete truth. I think most of the time memory isn't a problem but CPU is, and I don't see/know if this diet libc is decreasing CPU load. More concurrency leads to more memory usage but also to more CPU susage. Of course I could be wrong here :) Greets, Franky --

Re: ANNOUNCE: qmail now works with the diet libc

2001-06-07 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Mark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Er, what's the chance of have a ps which compares qmail-popd, > qmail-smtp and qmail-remote then? Kinda relevant doncha think? You are right. This is a diet libc pop3: USER PID %CPU %MEM SIZE RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND leitner 3232 0.4

Re: ANNOUNCE: qmail now works with the diet libc

2001-06-06 Thread Mark
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:54:33PM +0200, Felix von Leitner allegedly wrote: > I recently did a few updates to my diet libc > (http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/) and it can now compile and link qmail. > Since the diet libc can also compile and link openssl, the STARTTLS > patch also works. > > What's