lists and archives on the same too.
Cheers
Rajesh.
- Original Message -
From: "John White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: Mailing from One connection
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:30:52PM -0600, Rog
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:30:52PM -0600, Roger Walker wrote:
> Test with stock qmail on a Solaris workstation, 10,000 copies sent
> to the same email address (obviously the same domain) using qmail-inject:
> 30 minutes.
>
> Test from same workstation with a script to generate 10,000
* Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010709]:
> "Dave Sill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >-Dave
>
> That's bizarre. What I actually sent was:
>
> http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#multi-rcpt
>
> -Dave
>
> -Dave
>
If I could make a guess, in the original message you had
"http: www.
>I beg to differ...
Only quoted the evidence...
>Wheras
>qmail just cranks out each message in it's own instance and does not have to
>deal with all those extra commands and can open as many as (in my case) 400
>connections to a single remote server at one shoot, limiting my bandwidth to
crank out something like 1400 messages a minute sustained
using qmail.. Can Sendmail do the same?? I think not.
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Mailing fro
Roger Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip bogus test]
> I get the results that I expected - to send to the same domain (ignoring
> VERP requirements), it is faster to use a single connection for multiple
> messages than to use qmail.
Fine. Don't use qmail. This discussion is closed.
Charl
"Dave Sill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-Dave
That's bizarre. What I actually sent was:
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#multi-rcpt
-Dave
-Dave
>"Rodney Broom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>This has been hashed, rehashed, and re-re-hashed on this list. It
>inevitably ends in a flameware, somebody telling somebody else to
>profile rather then speculate, and a series of past analyses of these
>events supporting both sides of the argument
-Dave
"Rodney Broom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> D Rajesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> DR> > If in the total 20,000 mails, say 5000 are hotmail, 5000 are yahoo and
> the
> DR> > rest are to other domains. Then, is it possible to open a single
> DR> > qmai
Rodney Broom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> D Rajesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
re: batched recipients per-MX or per-domain
> DR> > I guess this speeds up the mail delivery amazingly
>
> CC> No, it slows it down tremendously. That's why qmail doesn
"Rodney Broom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ===> OK, to be fair I'll include the example of sending a bunch of mail to
> this same domain with a single connection but with differing message bodies.
Note that VERP, which is very useful for mailing lists, requires this
approach, because the one c
> Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> D Rajesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DR> > If in the total 20,000 mails, say 5000 are hotmail, 5000 are yahoo and
the
DR> > rest are to other domains. Then, is it possible to open a single
DR> > qmail-remote process and dump all messages to be sent to hotma
you're asking for the perfect spam
solution
your targets get mail messages without a To: header
or a bogus one, and if they're lucky enough to receive mail on one address but
reply with another, you'll never know who's it coming from
it's clearly not the right way to do
things
dan
-
D Rajesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If in the total 20,000 mails, say 5000 are hotmail, 5000 are yahoo and the
> rest are to other domains. Then, is it possible to open a single
> qmail-remote process and dump all messages to be sent to hotmail on one
> connection and open another connection fo
> I am sending different mails to 20,000 recipients at a time.
> So, each qmail-remote sends a mail to each recipient.
> or am I wrong
No, that's more-or-less how it works.
> If in the total 20,000 mails, say 5000 are hotmail, 5000 are
> yahoo and the rest are to other domains. Then, is it
16 matches
Mail list logo
