Re: Relaying problem

2001-07-04 Thread Chris Johnson
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 03:37:31PM +, qmail wrote: > A typical bounce message looks like this... > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mms-research3.marketingms.com. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following > addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up

Re: Relaying problem

2001-07-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I recently set up a second totally basic qmail installation intented for > sending only for a particular project. The return address for bounces and > replies is an address on the main server. Fine. > Problem. I am getting a lot of bounces that from other se

RE: relaying problem, please help

2001-02-12 Thread Alexander Jernejcic
hi, Peter Brezny wrote: > I have virtual domains configured using vpopmail and sqwebmail, they are > able to send mail to other domains hosted on the bsd 4.2 system i am using > to run these mail programs, however they are not allowed to send mail out to > other domains on the internet. ...snip.

RE: Relaying problem..

2000-04-05 Thread Soffen, Matthew
Now for the obvious question, what does your /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts file look like ? Is beachassociates.com in it ? Is it a virtual server (if so, is it in /var/qmail/control/virtualservers and NOT in /var/qmail/control/locals) or is it a local domain ? Matt Soffen Web Intranet D

Re: Relaying problem..

2000-04-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
Chad Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First off, yes, I've read life with qmail and everything I can about > rcpthosts. :) > > The error message I'm receiving is: > > Error sending to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (553 sorry, that domain isn't in > my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)) > [Tue Apr 4 17:2

RE: Relaying problem..

2000-04-04 Thread Travis Rail
Make sure that the primay IP address of the web server is in your /etc/tcp.smtp file and then do a "qmail cdb" and "qmail restart". Basically when your web server sends data via email Qmail doesn't like who it is coming from. You need to identify the IP address and domain that your web server se

Re: Relaying problem

1999-09-24 Thread Cyril Bitterich
> Hi again. I have managed to get tcpserver to work with my qmail installation and am > now testing relaying. > I have set up tcpserver to allow from 212.: How? Is the line in your tcp.smtp file like the following? 212.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > I first tried a message to a remote host which was r

Re: Relaying problem

1999-09-23 Thread Dave Sill
Marek Narkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have set up tcpserver to allow from 212.: >which is the group of IPs my ISP uses. That's not good enough. You also need to set the RELAYCLIENT environment variable. Let's see your tcp.smtp file. >I first tried a message to a remote host which was r

Re: Relaying problem

1999-07-10 Thread Peter Haworth
Tarkan Hocaoglu wrote: > I set up rcpthosts and tcp.smtp files in order to allow incoming and > outgoing mails only for my domain. > > I use an EXTERNAL PC with a different IP address to test this > configuration. > > I use this set of tests doing a telnet connection to my mailhub : > > 1- mai

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-19 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 04:35:49PM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: | > - "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | > | > | Is it possible that these were domains in which they had just added | > | the MX and the old zone data was still cached in various pl

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-19 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 04:00:59PM -0500, Asmodeus wrote: > I might be wrong (I tend to muddle my way through problems), but just > today I was adding another subdomain to handle mail for and I ran into the > same error message. As far as I can tell (sorry, I don't have the FAQ > memorized...yet

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-19 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 04:35:49PM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: > - "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > | Is it possible that these were domains in which they had just added > | the MX and the old zone data was still cached in various places in > | the DNS, so your qmail didn't have a

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-18 Thread Asmodeus
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, torben fjerdingstad wrote: > I put this list into control/rcpthosts on mail.isp.dk (name not real) > and get mail.isp.dk added as a lower precedence MX in my customer's > zone files. That should be enough, right? Nothing more necessary. > > The problem. > I have, too many ti

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-18 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
- "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | Is it possible that these were domains in which they had just added | the MX and the old zone data was still cached in various places in | the DNS, so your qmail didn't have access to the latest zone yet? But then his server would not even be aware that

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-18 Thread torben fjerdingstad
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 09:13:56AM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote: > > From: torben fjerdingstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 15:47:50 +0100 > > > > No. In the cases I remember DNS was delegated to the customer's > > name server. I run the ISP's nameserver so I am used to check D

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-18 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: torben fjerdingstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 15:47:50 +0100 > > No. In the cases I remember DNS was delegated to the customer's > name server. I run the ISP's nameserver so I am used to check DNS. > I could not find any error in DNS for the customer's domains. Is it

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-18 Thread torben fjerdingstad
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: > - torben fjerdingstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > | The problem. > | I have, too many times, seen mail.isp.dk reject mail to > | my customers domains with the following error: > | > | "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-prefer

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-18 Thread Russell Nelson
torben fjerdingstad writes: > I have, too many times, seen mail.isp.dk reject mail to > my customers domains with the following error: > > "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host," > "it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-18 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 12:52:53PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote: > DNS says (made up names): > > customer.dk. <--- customer's zone > IN MX 10 mail.customer.dk. <-- customer's server > IN MX 20 mail.isp.d

Re: Relaying problem (new approach)

1999-03-18 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
- torben fjerdingstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | The problem. | I have, too many times, seen mail.isp.dk reject mail to | my customers domains with the following error: | | "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host," | "it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't

Re: Relaying problem (kind of)

1999-03-17 Thread torben fjerdingstad
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 05:14:20PM +0300, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:06:27PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote: > > > Things do not work quite as I expect. > > > > Say I am MX for domain inside.dk (this is not a real name). > > So, I put two lines into rcpthosts and HUP qm

Re: Relaying problem (kind of)

1999-03-17 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:06:27PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote: > Things do not work quite as I expect. > > Say I am MX for domain inside.dk (this is not a real name). > So, I put two lines into rcpthosts and HUP qmail-smtpd: There's no qmail-smtpd to HUP. It is started each time a connect