Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-19 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Phil Barnett wrote: > > Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as well > as_ port 25? > > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers > are blocking outbound traffic destined for port 25. Sure. Just tell tcpserver to listen on ano

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-19 Thread Phil Barnett
On 19 Nov 2000, at 16:32, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Phil Barnett wrote: > > > > > Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as well > > as_ port 25? > > > > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers > > are blocking outbound traffic

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-19 Thread Jose AP Celestino
Phil Barnett wrote: > Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as well > as_ port 25? > > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers > are blocking outbound traffic destined for port 25. > As easy as to stick tcpserver on a port (ports) other than the u

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-19 Thread Jose AP Celestino
Phil Barnett wrote: > On 19 Nov 2000, at 16:32, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Phil Barnett wrote: > > > > > > > > Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as well > > > as_ port 25? > > > > > > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their provide

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-19 Thread Phil Barnett
On 19 Nov 2000, at 21:51, Jose AP Celestino wrote: > Phil Barnett wrote: > > > On 19 Nov 2000, at 16:32, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Phil Barnett wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as > > > > well as_ port 25? > > > >

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-19 Thread Piotr Kasztelowicz
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Jose AP Celestino wrote: > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -P -H -R -u 64011 -g 101 0 smtp ^^ > /usr/local/bin/tcpcontrol /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd & a propos tcpserver with smtp - on Solaris, where zero '0' bef

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-19 Thread Amitai Schlair
on 11/19/00 4:23 PM, Phil Barnett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers > are blocking outbound traffic destined for port 25. I'm having the same problem, so far with EarthLink. Have you encountered any other ISPs that do this? If there

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-19 Thread -dsr-
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 10:36:50PM -0500, Amitai Schlair wrote: > on 11/19/00 4:23 PM, Phil Barnett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers > > are blocking outbound traffic destined for port 25. > > I'm having the same problem, so fa

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-19 Thread -dsr-
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 11:00:42PM -0500, -dsr- wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 10:36:50PM -0500, Amitai Schlair wrote: > > on 11/19/00 4:23 PM, Phil Barnett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers > > > are blocking outbound traf

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-19 Thread Amitai Schlair
on 11/19/00 11:00 PM, -dsr- at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 10:36:50PM -0500, Amitai Schlair wrote: >> on 11/19/00 4:23 PM, Phil Barnett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers >>> are blocking outbound traffic

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-20 Thread Ricardo Cerqueira
> > a propos tcpserver with smtp - on Solaris, where zero '0' before > smtp word has been written the program not works. So we uses it > without to write in command this '0' writting only nummber of port > and 'smtp' > Errr... and it works??? Those args are supposed to be "IP address" and "por

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-20 Thread Rob Hines Jr.
Just go into /etc/services and make a name alias if you feel more comfortable with that. tcpserver actually looks up 'smtp' in the services file to find out the port number. right now, I am using smtp-ghost in my second tcpserver init, and I set up smtp-ghost in the services file to look at my alt

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-20 Thread Ricardo Cerqueira
That's not the issue. According to the original mail, he wrote "tcpserver 25 smtp" > without to write in command this '0' writting only nummber of port > and 'smtp' That 25 is supposed to be the IP address where tcpserver is supposed to bind itself to. I _know_ you can write whatever you want i

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-20 Thread Rob Hines Jr.
Here's my run script in supervise: #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`/usr/xpg4/bin/id -u qmaild` NOFILESGID=`/usr/xpg4/bin/id -g qmaild` MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 400 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R -l 0 -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTP

Re: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-20 Thread Ricardo Cerqueira
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 03:14:43PM -0500, Rob Hines Jr. wrote: [ a lot of irrelevant stuff ] Which part of "not writing 0, writing number of port _and_ smtp" didn't you understand? Let me translate: It sounds like he wrote "tcpserver -v -H -R -whateveroptions 25 smtp $QMAIL/qmail-smtpd" Can yo

RE: SMTP on a port other than 25

2000-11-21 Thread Michael Boyiazis
trust the endless supply of open relays out there. -- Michael Boyiazis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail Architect, NetZero, Inc. > -Original Message- > From: -dsr- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 8:01 PM > To: Amitai Schlair > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj