Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-25 Thread Andrzej
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 06:18:27PM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote: On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 04:58:05PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: Andrzej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 23 October 2000 at 13:59:20 +0200 On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 04:59:52PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote: You can use stunnel to

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-25 Thread Adam McKenna
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 09:17:39AM +0200, Andrzej wrote: You mean limitind access based on IP numbers? This will only work for users with fixed IPs. To summarize: It looks like we can't have POP3+SSL+Relay control + running in a secure way. SMTP is not secure. That's just the way it

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-25 Thread Dave Sill
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SMTP is not secure. That's just the way it is. There is no reason to run SSL on your SMTP port. How about privacy? It's not as good as end-to-end, e.g. using PGP, but it's better than nothing. -Dave

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-25 Thread Adam McKenna
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:22:18AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote: Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SMTP is not secure. That's just the way it is. There is no reason to run SSL on your SMTP port. How about privacy? It's not as good as end-to-end, e.g. using PGP, but it's better than

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-25 Thread Andrzej
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:59:59PM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:22:18AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote: Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SMTP is not secure. That's just the way it is. There is no reason to run SSL on your SMTP port. How about privacy? It's

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-23 Thread Andrzej
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 04:59:52PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote: You can use stunnel to encapsulate qmail-pop3d withing SSL. [...] stunnel and other SSL wrappers work great, but then qmail sees all connections incoming from localhost. It's not possible to use the "POP3 before SMTP" relay

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-23 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
Or is there any way to use an SSL wrapper and still know which IP can realy? I think it's possible with tcpserver/stunnel. But I never tried it. Regards, Frank

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-23 Thread Adam McKenna
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 04:58:05PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: Andrzej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 23 October 2000 at 13:59:20 +0200 On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 04:59:52PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote: You can use stunnel to encapsulate qmail-pop3d withing SSL. [...] stunnel

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-23 Thread Chris Johnson
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 09:06:35AM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote: On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 01:59:20PM +0200, Andrzej wrote: stunnel and other SSL wrappers work great, but then qmail sees all connections incoming from localhost. It's not possible to use the "POP3 before SMTP" relay controls any

RE: SSL POP3

2000-10-22 Thread Hubbard, David
You can use stunnel to encapsulate qmail-pop3d withing SSL. Find out more about it at http://www.stunnel.org I use it with my own certificates generated by OpenSSL. I also use it with the vpopmail software on top of qmail, so not straight qmail, but it works either way. My script is based on

Re: SSL + POP3 + SMTPrelay

2000-09-07 Thread Dale Miracle
Manuel Gisbert wrote: As there were serveral threads dealing with qmail-smtpd and possible ways of encrypting smtp traffic with ssl/tls in the last time, someone might have a solution for this prob to: vpopmail 4.9 qmail 1.03 I use stunnel to encrypt my pop3 traffic. Works fine with