Re: qmail-smptd/tcpserver glitch?

1999-01-12 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
- James DeMong [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | I've found that on occasion tcpserver/qmail-smtpd takes | 10 seconds to give an "ok" to an smtpd connection attempt. That could be the time taken by tcpserver to do various DNS lookups and possibly also an ident lookup against the client. Perfectly normal.

Re: qmail-smptd/tcpserver glitch?

1999-01-12 Thread James DeMong
Russell Nelson wrote: James DeMong writes: I've found that on occasion tcpserver/qmail-smtpd takes 10 seconds to give an "ok" to an smtpd connection attempt. Typically that's a DNS or indentd timeout. Can't be the latter since you're using the -R switch. If you're concerned that it

Re: qmail-smptd/tcpserver glitch?

1999-01-12 Thread Scott Schwartz
James DeMong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I've found that on occasion tcpserver/qmail-smtpd takes | 10 seconds to give an "ok" to an smtpd connection attempt. Make sure you invoke it with the "-R" option, to tell it not to bother wasting time on ``ident'' lookups.

RE: qmail-smptd/tcpserver glitch?

1999-01-12 Thread Andrew Richards
James, (I am trying to build a business case for my boss that qmail (on Linux/PC) is _better_ than sendmail (on HP/PA) and I would like to have every possible eveidence to back it up.) I find these 2 URLs very convincing regarding sendmail security,