Stuart Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just a note that there is a CERT advisory about TCP wrappers at the
moment. It seems that it was replaced (trojan code) and isn't exactly
'friendly' anymore.
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-99-01-Trojan-TCP-Wrappers.html
Note that this only affects
You are assuming the security breach was in the ftp server.
Dax Kelson
On 25 Jan 1999, Russ Allbery wrote:
This is probably better sent to a different list, but I'd start using
Dan's FTP daemon rather than a huge package like wu-ftpd that I really
don't trust if it only had a few more
Dax Kelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are assuming the security breach was in the ftp server.
No, not really. It could have been any number of things. But on my
system, I'm currently running Apache, qmail, ssh, Kerberos, and an
anonymous ftp server, and of all of those things the package
On 24-Jan-99 Martin Searancke wrote:
Strange problem. I compiled a new copy of my tcp wrapper program with
Paranoid mode turned off so as to allow mail to get through from sites that
have a problem with this. The new problem is whenever I use the new copy it
stops us from using that server
