Re: Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Alex Kramarov
well, that was in the heat of the moment, make it 5000. But 2000 can make people send in plain text, someone has already proposed this here.   ---Original Message---   From: Alex Pennace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday

Re: Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:12:54PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote: > well, that was in the heat of the moment, make it 5000. But 2000 can make people >send in plain text, someone has already proposed this here. Why should anyone impose artificial limits on the size of messages to this mailing list,

Re: Re: Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Alex Kramarov
Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >Why should anyone impose artificial limits on the size of messages>to this mailing list, only because>a) you use a broken MUA>b) you are unable to configure it correctly>c) you seem to be the only one th

Re: Re: Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-30 Thread Henning Brauer
Your "great new multimedia MUA" is totally broken. To advise only the three things annoying me most (apart from the html nonsense): -missing reference headers -multiple "Re:"'s -lines not wrapped -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20