: 18 July 2001 22:14
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lukas Beeler
> Subject: Re: multiple qmail-send
>
>
> Please excuse my HTML side of the email. Won't happen again.
>
> I wasn't asking about qmail-remote or qmail-local. What I was asking is
> "Could I EVER see more
At 22:09 18.07.2001 +0200, you wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 09:52:06PM +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote:
> > At 21:40 18.07.2001 +0200, Daniel BODEA wrote:
> > >Can there be, in the normal flow of qmail, multiple instances of
> > >qmail-send running at the same time (?)
> > yes of course... what do yo
thanks
it's how I actually expected it to function
too bad it's the misleading responses the ones that come up first
dan
- Original Message -
From: "Henning Brauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 10:09 PM
TED]>
To: "Daniel BODEA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: multiple qmail-send
> At 21:40 18.07.2001 +0200, Daniel BODEA wrote:
> >Can there be, in the normal flow of qmail, multiple instances of
&
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 09:52:06PM +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote:
> At 21:40 18.07.2001 +0200, Daniel BODEA wrote:
> >Can there be, in the normal flow of qmail, multiple instances of
> >qmail-send running at the same time (?)
> yes of course... what do you think is the concurrency limit for ?
> exac
"Daniel BODEA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can there be, in the normal flow of qmail, multiple instances of
>qmail-send running at the same time (?) because multithreaded it's
>not, and I haven't seen any locking mechanisms for the ressources
>qmail-send accesses directly.
one queue == one qmai
At 21:40 18.07.2001 +0200, Daniel BODEA wrote:
>Can there be, in the normal flow of qmail, multiple instances of
>qmail-send running at the same time (?)
yes of course... what do you think is the concurrency limit for ?
exactly that
> because multithreaded it's not, and I haven't seen any lock
