In previous emails I noted that a qmail installation as part of Network
Associates Webshield SMTP for Solaris was exhibiting strange behaviour with
some email that could not be processed or sent correctly. These messages
kept reappearing in the intd and mess subdirectories, quickly eating up disk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Am I right in
>thinking that the retry table (40 attempts at increasing periods) would
>continue for about ten weeks before giving up?
That depends on what queuelifetime is set to. The default is one week.
-Dave
Dave Sill wrote:
> Anyone ever heard of Webshield? Are they really bundling qmail?
>
The product is Networks Associates Webshield for SMTP. We have a site licence
for all NAI products, and as I was being forced into a quick fix for virus
checking all Internet email I had this included as part o
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dave Sill writes:
> > >I've yet to try changing the file message date on the file in the mess
> > >subdirs.
> >
> > Wait until the message is queued (there's a "todo" file for it) or
> > preprocessed (there's an "info" file for it), then "touch" the "me
Dave Sill writes:
> >I've yet to try changing the file message date on the file in the mess
> >subdirs.
>
> Wait until the message is queued (there's a "todo" file for it) or
> preprocessed (there's an "info" file for it), then "touch" the "mess"
> file into the future a couple weeks. It'll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>As part of the Webshield virus scanner, a version of qmail appears to
>have been installed.
Anyone ever heard of Webshield? Are they really bundling qmail?
>The question is, can I delete these messages from the queue directory
>structure?
Yes and no. If a message in r
Hi there,
Hopefully someone can help me with a problem we're having with
(probably) qmail.
Main system feature is : Solaris 2.6 / Webshield SMTP
As part of the Webshield virus scanner, a version of qmail appears to
have been installed.
We use sendmail as the main connection to the Internet. Th
