<blush> power saving... <digging in the ground> sorry for the disturbance... /Ekki On Fri, 19 May 2000 03:11:43 +0200, qmail wrote: > Claudio, > sorry, detailed information will take some more time (we are trying to > track down things as exact as possible). > For now: > - patch is qmail-ldap-1.03-20000401.patch > - no imap around > - my mistake: pop3 is NOT affected, Curtis was right > - we're producing high load on smtp using "postal" > - BTW: symptoms appeared on systems with daemontools-0.53, > just upgraded these, no results yet... > > 'll be back... > so long, TIA > /Ekki > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 04:39:22PM +0200, qmail wrote: > > Hi, > > any results on the below questions from the qmail list? I feel like > I'm > > experiencing the very same behaviour in my test environment. But IMHO > > not necessarilly related to NFS or Solaris (same with linux). Both > POP3 > > and SMTP seem to be affected. > > > > Which patch do you use? > And could you locate the possible bottleneck? > Have a look at ps, top, netstat and perhaps lsof. > I can not test this. I'm sorry. > > There could be a problem with the imap connections. A lot of tcp > sessions > to the imap server in the TIME_WAIT or simmilar state. > We know about this problem and try to fix that (with cldap perhaps) >
