Re: Re: Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-30 Thread Henning Brauer
Your "great new multimedia MUA" is totally broken. To advise only the three things annoying me most (apart from the html nonsense): -missing reference headers -multiple "Re:"'s -lines not wrapped -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Alex Kramarov
Maybe a maximum-mail size has to be set on the box running this list, to prevent such errors from happening again. a simple echo 2000 /var/qmail/control/databytes would suffice ...

Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Alex Pennace
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:01:50PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote: Maybe a maximum-mail size has to be set on the box running this list, to prevent such errors from happening again. a simple echo 2000 /var/qmail/control/databytes would suffice ... You do realize that a limit of 2000 bytes

Re: Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Alex Kramarov
well, that was in the heat of the moment, make it 5000. But 2000 can make people send in plain text, someone hasalready proposed thishere. ---Original Message--- From: Alex Pennace [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday,

Re: Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:12:54PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote: well, that was in the heat of the moment, make it 5000. But 2000 can make people send in plain text, someone has already proposed this here. Why should anyone impose artificial limits on the size of messages to this mailing list,

Re: Re: Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Alex Kramarov
Markus Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Why should anyone impose artificial limits on the size of messagesto this mailing list, only becausea) you use a broken MUAb) you are unable to configure it correctlyc) you seem to be the only one that has

Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Aaron L. Meehan
Quoting Alex Kramarov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Markus Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Why should anyone impose artificial limits on the size of messages to this mailing list, only because a) you use a broken MUA b) you are unable to configure it correctly c) you seem to be the only one that

Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Andy Bradford
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:48:21 +0200, "Alex Kramarov" wrote: I do not use a broken MUA. I use an MUA that helps me construct a more personal e-mail by adding backgrounds and other multimedia elements. If you want to check that out, there is a link to it's site on the bottom of my e-mail.

RE: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

2001-01-29 Thread Matt Bailey
Or better yet get off the list..