Re: a new kind of spam?

2000-07-13 Thread Eric Cox
Mate Wierdl wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 01:28:17PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > > Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I do run rblsmtpd with dul. The IP (207.100.21.156) does not exist---this > > > is why I thought it is a dynamic IP. How do I figure out which domain

Re: a new kind of spam?

2000-07-13 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 01:28:17PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I do run rblsmtpd with dul. The IP (207.100.21.156) does not exist---this > > is why I thought it is a dynamic IP. How do I figure out which domain owns > > it? > > As others have

Re: a new kind of spam?

2000-07-11 Thread Charles Cazabon
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do run rblsmtpd with dul. The IP (207.100.21.156) does not exist---this > is why I thought it is a dynamic IP. How do I figure out which domain owns > it? As others have pointed out, the IP address does exist. Two other gentlemen were kind enough

Re: a new kind of spam?

2000-07-11 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On 11-Jul-2000, Mate Wierdl wrote: > I do run rblsmtpd with dul. The IP (207.100.21.156) does not exist---this > is why I thought it is a dynamic IP. It does exist, it just doesn't have a reverse record. What makes you think it doesn't exist? > How do I figure out which domain owns it? [~]$ d

Re: a new kind of spam?

2000-07-11 Thread Peter Green
also sprach lyx: > I do run rblsmtpd with dul. The IP (207.100.21.156) does not exist---this > is why I thought it is a dynamic IP. How do I figure out which domain owns > it? You can try ``whois [EMAIL PROTECTED]'': [whois.arin.net] Intermedia Communications of Florida, Inc. (NETBLK-ICIX

Re: a new kind of spam?

2000-07-11 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:56:48AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps somebody can tell me how to deal with this: apparently a dynamic > > IP connected to my server and dropped a message in one of the mailinglists's > > mailbox. Or this is not a dyn

Re: a new kind of spam?

2000-07-11 Thread Charles Cazabon
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps somebody can tell me how to deal with this: apparently a dynamic > IP connected to my server and dropped a message in one of the mailinglists's > mailbox. Or this is not a dynamic IP, but nonexistent one, and qmail got > fooled somehow? [...] >

Re: a new kind of spam?

2000-07-11 Thread James Raftery
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 12:43:04PM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote: > mailbox. Or this is not a dynamic IP, but nonexistent one, and qmail got > fooled somehow? It doesn't seem to have working reverse DNS. maybe [james] (~)> host 207.100.21.156 Host not found, try again. james -- James Raftery (J

a new kind of spam?

2000-07-11 Thread Mate Wierdl
Perhaps somebody can tell me how to deal with this: apparently a dynamic IP connected to my server and dropped a message in one of the mailinglists's mailbox. Or this is not a dynamic IP, but nonexistent one, and qmail got fooled somehow? Here is the header Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M