Re: another broken mailer - #2

2000-07-22 Thread Michael T. Babcock
Scratch previous comment -- bounces are going to individual senders, not to list (because headers are not rewritten, which is a good thing, I suppose). I'll add a filter myself for my host. "Aaron L. Meehan" wrote: > My mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced, so I malleted them into > badmailfrom-

Re: another broken mailer [MAILER-DAEMON@infoteen.com: Returned Mail: user qmail@list.cr.yp.to unknown!]

2000-07-22 Thread Michael T. Babcock
I think unsubscribing them is probably unnecessary, but blocking their 'bounce' messages at the list server would probably be smart. "Aaron L. Meehan" wrote: > My mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced, so I malleted them into > badmailfrom--they are kind enough to send their bounces with a > non-nu

Re: another broken mailer [MAILER-DAEMON@infoteen.com: Returned Mail: user qmail@list.cr.yp.to unknown!]

2000-07-22 Thread Aaron L. Meehan
Quoting Peter van Dijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > And my previous message about a broken mailer generated a bounce from > *another* broken mailer... > > - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >- My mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced, so

Re: another broken mailer

2000-07-22 Thread asantos
Yep, same thing here. I think someone (probably <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, since it appears in the bounces tough the original message was no addressed to said individual) has a mail forwarder that gags with semicolon separated addresses in the To: field. Armando

another broken mailer [MAILER-DAEMON@infoteen.com: Returned Mail: user qmail@list.cr.yp.to unknown!]

2000-07-22 Thread Peter van Dijk
And my previous message about a broken mailer generated a bounce from *another* broken mailer... - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 23018 invoked from netw