erorr when patch --verbose -p1 < /tmp/big-concurrency.patch

2001-03-29 Thread Sid Wilroy
-- Patching file `qmail-send.c' using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 262. Hunk #2 FAILED at 908. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1547. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1555. 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to qmail-send.c.rej Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The

Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-11 Thread Martin Volesky
On 11/12/00 at 2:25 PM Charles Cazabon wrote: > >At least as compared to having made the changes manually after boot. >However, his system could exhibit poorer interactive response compared to >before modifying the max-files and max-inodes due to the increased load >from qmail. > >Charles Yes C

Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-11 Thread Charles Cazabon
Martin Volesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/12/00 at 12:30 PM Federico Edelman Anaya wrote: > > >U.. It's posible when I apply this change the performance of the machine > >turn slowly? > > There is no reason why your system should run any slower because of the > sysctl.conf modificati

Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-11 Thread Martin Volesky
On 11/12/00 at 12:30 PM Federico Edelman Anaya wrote: >Martin: >Ok! .. thanks! > >U.. It's posible when I apply this change the performance of the machine turn >slowly? > Federico, There is no reason why your system should run any slower because of the sysctl.conf modification

Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-11 Thread Federico Edelman Anaya
Martin: Ok! .. thanks! U.. It's posible when I apply this change the performance of the machine turn slowly? Martin Volesky wrote: > On 09/12/00 at 3:21 PM Federico Edelman Anaya wrote: > > >A few days ago .. I post on the list many question about > &g

Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-10 Thread Martin Volesky
On 09/12/00 at 3:21 PM Federico Edelman Anaya wrote: >A few days ago .. I post on the list many question about >big-concurrency.patch ... > >I was reading other list about Qmail and I get this solution about the >problem with the FD .. > >The solution was: > >echo &

Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-09 Thread Sean Reifschneider
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:31:16PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: >> echo "65536" > /proc/sys/fs/inode-max >> echo "16384" > /proc/sys/fs/file-max > >This is really more of a Unix/Linux question than anything else. However, >try adding those two lines to the end of /etc/rc.d/rc.local or your >syst

Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-09 Thread Charles Cazabon
Federico Edelman Anaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The solution was: > > echo "65536" > /proc/sys/fs/inode-max > echo "16384" > /proc/sys/fs/file-max > > So.. you need to do this every system reboot, I don't know how to make > this persistent.. anybody have idea or know how to make this pers

big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-09 Thread Federico Edelman Anaya
A few days ago .. I post on the list many question about big-concurrency.patch ... I was reading other list about Qmail and I get this solution about the problem with the FD .. This is the log whit error: Report of Qmailanalog: - Errors of FD?: 24 6.36 /bin/sh: /usr/bin/ezmlm-return

Re: Installing big-concurrency.patch

2000-06-26 Thread Sylwester S. Biernacki
2000-06-27, at 02:00:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > What's the correct procedure for installing the big-concurrency patch on a > live system? > Is it just a patch, make, make setup check, restart qmail? Or will it > affect/break anything else? I donna know what's in your case but I would

Re: Installing big-concurrency.patch

2000-06-26 Thread Mark Mentovai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >What's the correct procedure for installing the big-concurrency patch on a >live system? >Is it just a patch, make, make setup check, restart qmail? Or will it >affect/break anything else? This advice applies ONLY to the big-concurrency patch (specifically, the one from

Installing big-concurrency.patch

2000-06-26 Thread brianb-qmail
Hi, What's the correct procedure for installing the big-concurrency patch on a live system? Is it just a patch, make, make setup check, restart qmail? Or will it affect/break anything else? Thanks, Brian -- Brian Baquiran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.baquiran.com/ AIM: bbaquiran Work: (632)71