Re: bsd.mail.wrapper (was Re: extra ">")

1998-12-30 Thread Samuel Dries-Daffner
Yes the address was as you stated, and the bsd.mail.wrapper was as simple as this: #!/bin/sh cat | /var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject So far it looks like its working fine for BSD! We'll have to do some more research to test the form/mail scripts from the web, but hopefully

Re: bsd.mail.wrapper (was Re: extra ">")

1998-12-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Samuel Dries-Daffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The sendmail wrapper does fine for many functions but, as I found out, > makes for lots of problems when using reply and reply all features of > BSD mail. Was the problem caused by passing sendmail an address on the command line that looks like

bsd.mail.wrapper (was Re: extra ">")

1998-12-30 Thread Samuel Dries-Daffner
Several responses to me have focused on the idea that BSD had some problems with the code, and that perhaps I could hack it into shape. My contact with SGI indicates that the problem was not with the BSD code...and to look for the answer somewhere in the wrapper that qmail was sending thru... Th