Re: concurrencyremote up to 500

2000-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
Ricardo Albano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >It is almost certainly a resource limit the system is imposing. It may be > >fds, or it could be something else. What are you limits currently set to? > >Have you tried changing them? You seem to have diagnosed your own problem > >here. > I can't im

Re: concurrencyremote up to 500

2000-08-04 Thread Ricardo Albano
I can't imagine where to start the diagnostic, I think the problem is in the OS Limit but I need some specific pointers to the problem to ask Sun peoples. >Ricardo Albano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello,I'm trying to get qmail running in a Solaris 7 box and get up to 500 >> qmail-remote proc

Re: concurrencyremote up to 500

2000-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
Ricardo Albano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello,I'm trying to get qmail running in a Solaris 7 box and get up to 500 > qmail-remote proccesses at the same time, I do the following steps : [...] > But I noticed that the maximun number of "qmail-remote procs" is 30 ! My > box is a high traff

concurrencyremote up to 500

2000-08-04 Thread Ricardo Albano
Hello,I'm trying to get qmail running in a Solaris 7 box and get up to 500 qmail-remote proccesses at the same time, I do the following steps :   1. Before compiling qmail-1.03 I applyed the "big concurrency patch" 2. Set conf-spawn to 500 in the qmail source tree 3. make setup check 4. ech