Fwd: Re: news: redhat switches to postfix + mailman (fwd)

2000-07-25 Thread Johan Almqvist
Oh boy... After a forward from this list... Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:34:28 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > We are in the process of migrating all Red Hat lists from the current list > > manager software/server running qmail/Smartlist to a new server running > > postfix and GNU Mailman (*). Ve

Re: news: redhat switches to postfix + mailman

2000-07-25 Thread Johan Almqvist
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 01:39:46PM -0600, Irwan Hadi wrote: > At 02:09 PM 7/25/00 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote: > > >This just came in; submitted for your discussion: > > I think this can be happened maybe because qmail is too greedy in bandwith > consuming ? because redhat doesn't use EZMLM but

Re: news: redhat switches to postfix + mailman

2000-07-25 Thread Jason Haar
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 03:25:56PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote: > Smartlist vs. Mailman is a no-brainer. Mailman vs. ezmlm is far more > interesting. Mailman is prettier, with its fancy web interface. But > ezmlm has automatic VERP-based bounce handling and doesn't require a > web server or the use of

Re: news: redhat switches to postfix + mailman

2000-07-25 Thread Jamie Heilman
> Smartlist vs. Mailman is a no-brainer. Mailman vs. ezmlm is far more > interesting. Mailman is prettier, with its fancy web interface. But > ezmlm has automatic VERP-based bounce handling and doesn't require a > web server or the use of a web interface. Yeah but, python vs. C? I mean do you

Re: news: redhat switches to postfix + mailman

2000-07-25 Thread Irwan Hadi
At 02:09 PM 7/25/00 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote: >This just came in; submitted for your discussion: I think this can be happened maybe because qmail is too greedy in bandwith consuming ? because redhat doesn't use EZMLM but SmartList so the single RCPT To concept is not too usefull. > > > >

Re: news: redhat switches to postfix + mailman

2000-07-25 Thread Dave Sill
>> ... This migration will not only address >> performace issues that have arisen due to the number of lists/members on Red >> Hat lists, but also highly improve ease of use for list members. They don't mention whether their performance issues were Smartlist or qmail related. If they have evidenc

news: redhat switches to postfix + mailman

2000-07-25 Thread David L. Nicol
This just came in; submitted for your discussion: > > Attention all List Members: > > We are in the process of migrating all Red Hat lists from the current list > manager software/server running qmail/Smartlist to a new server running > postfix and GNU Mailman (*). Within the next week you wi