qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Paul Farber
hello all using qmail-1.03 daemontools .70 and ucspi-88 on several RH 6.2 based servers. It appears that all logging is being dumped to the first virtual console: info msg 224981: bytes 32957 from #@[] qp 9474 uid 0 starting delivery 1692: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: local

Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Chris Johnson
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:57AM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: It appears that all logging is being dumped to the first virtual console: info msg 224981: bytes 32957 from #@[] qp 9474 uid 0 starting delivery 1692: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 delivery

Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Dave Sill
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man page. Including the sticky bit on the on the qmail-send directory? Is this a supervise/multilog bug? No. anyone getting qmail to log deliveries to multilog using log/run ? Of course.

Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Paul Farber
I have drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service and under that drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 . drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 .. drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail drwxr-sr-x 5 root root

Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Chris Johnson
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service and under that drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 . drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 .. drwxr-sr-x 5 root root

Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Mark Delany
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: I have drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service and under that drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 . drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail4096 Feb 20 23:20 .. drwxr-sr-x 5 root

Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Paul Farber
DOH The manpage I have referneces .70 but nothing about a sticky bit oh well, live and learn.. and learn and learn and learn! Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote: On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM

Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Paul Farber
Tried that... but it will not fire off a copy of multilog: 3181 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd 3182 ?S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -qDHR -ladmin.f-tech.net -xt here is some file info: drwxr-sr-t 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd ./run=

Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Mark Delany
Assuminmg you're running this all via svscan, the problem is that svscan only notices the +t flag when it first sees the directory in /service. You need to remove the service and re-add it. I believe the daemontools page at cr.yp.to has the sequence needed to do this. Regards. On Fri, Feb

Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Paul Farber
Is there a specific kernel setting I need for supervise to log correctly??? I am on kernel 2.4.1 it's working fine on a RH 6.2 machine with 2.2.17 (using djbdns). The sticky bit seemed to have no effect.. and nothing is being logged error-wise. Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL

Re: qmail-conf-054 / multilog

2001-02-23 Thread Mark Delany
For debugging purposes you might want to run svscan manually so the errors go to the screen/window you're on. On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:25:11PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote: Is there a specific kernel setting I need for supervise to log Not unless it's some wierd Unix. svscan writes errors to