Anyone know of any reasion why I shouldn't set the qmail-qread
and qmail-qstat as setuid root? I've looked through the source, but
am looking for a last confirmation or "don't do that." -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
Emanuel.exe
Message-
From: jessica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qmail-qread and qmail-qstat as suid root...
Anyone know of any reasion why I shouldn't set the qmail-qread
and qmail-qstat as setuid root? I've looked through
Panda Antivirus a trouvé les virus suivants dans le message :
Envoyé par :jessica
Adresse : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pour : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sujet : qmail-qread and qmail-qstat as suid root...
Date : 23/04/2001 17:22:52
THIS
Take off list NOW
-Original Message-
From: jessica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2001 15:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qmail-qread and qmail-qstat as suid root...
Anyone know of any reasion why I shouldn't set the qmail-qread
and qmail-qstat as setuid
Anyone know of any reasion why I shouldn't set the qmail-qread
and qmail-qstat as setuid root? I've looked through the source, but
am looking for a last confirmation or "don't do that." -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
Emanuel.exe
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:49:10PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Only suid or suid & guid? qmail-qstat and qmail-qread both
> rely on the qmail group to run through the queue.
suid&guid.
> Here's a quick binary wrapper that I was thinking about using
> that'd run as root, but woul
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 01:26:11AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > Anyone know of any reasion why I shouldn't set the qmail-qread
> > and qmail-qstat as setuid root? I've looked through the source, but
> > am looking for a la
, 2001 at 04:11:37PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Anyone know of any reasion why I shouldn't set the qmail-qread
> and qmail-qstat as setuid root? I've looked through the source, but
> am looking for a last confirmation or "don't do that." -sc
# envuidgid qmails tcpserver
Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone know of any reasion why I shouldn't set the qmail-qread
> and qmail-qstat as setuid root? I've looked through the source, but
> am looking for a last confirmation or "don't do that." -sc
Make them setuid qmailq, not setuid root.
That
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Anyone know of any reasion why I shouldn't set the qmail-qread
> and qmail-qstat as setuid root? I've looked through the source, but
> am looking for a last confirmation or "don't do that." -sc
qmail-qstat is a shellscript
Anyone know of any reasion why I shouldn't set the qmail-qread
and qmail-qstat as setuid root? I've looked through the source, but
am looking for a last confirmation or "don't do that." -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
PGP signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
