B. Engineer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > You can run multiple installations of qmail on the system--preferrably
> > using queues on different controllers. The trick is evenly dividing
> > the labor.
>
> Hmmm..
> I would be interested in hearing more on this. I would have thought that
> i
"B. Engineer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
>
>> You can run multiple installations of qmail on the system--preferrably
>> using queues on different controllers. The trick is evenly dividing
>> the labor.
>
>I would be interested in hearing more on this. I wou
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
> You can run multiple installations of qmail on the system--preferrably
> using queues on different controllers. The trick is evenly dividing
> the labor.
Hmmm..
I would be interested in hearing more on this. I would have thought that
it would not be poss
Van Liedekerke Franky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a way I can boost the performance of qmail send?
Faster hardware, especially the queue disk, will help, of course. A
solid state "disk" would really speed things up.
>Or can it be made multi-threaded?
You can run multiple installations
Hi,
I'm experiencing serious problems (slow queue processing) with qmail (sol
2.6), and I think the bottleneck is qmail-send. When I do a truss on this
process I see (truss -c):
hercules(root)/var/qmail/queue/intd> truss -c -p 19880
^Csyscall seconds calls errors
read .01
