qmail Digest 21 Dec 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 1220
Topics (messages 54266 through 54321):
accustamp....
54266 by: Seby
54272 by: Charles Cazabon
54275 by: Peter Samuel
Returned mail: Service unavailable - ERROR
54267 by: Peter Kozlov
Problem authenticating to POP server
54268 by: Andrew Buenaventura
Collect all mail in one account. (Second try)
54269 by: Bhavesh Vakil
54274 by: Charles Cazabon
Re: URGENT : Forward all mails in one account.
54270 by: Nathan Harmon
54273 by: Charles Cazabon
Re: tai64nlocal
54271 by: Kitabjian, Dave
Life w/qmail: multilog qmail link
54276 by: rdrake.telusplanet.net
54277 by: David Dyer-Bennet
54289 by: Dave Sill
Re: ETRN
54278 by: Jenny Holmberg
Exception-lists to MAPS-RBL-Filtering?
54279 by: Jerry Keene
54280 by: Jon Rust
54302 by: Jerry Keene
Qmail & Web
54281 by: Jean Caron
54283 by: Tim Hunter
54291 by: Brendon J. Colby
54320 by: Ryszard Lach
Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
54282 by: Felix von Leitner
54303 by: David Dyer-Bennet
54304 by: Einar Bordewich
54310 by: Eric Wang
54311 by: Paul Tan
54315 by: Jason Haar
svscan
54284 by: Thomas Holton
54285 by: Mark Delany
54286 by: martin langhoff
54287 by: Thomas Holton
54288 by: Thomas Holton
54292 by: Mark Delany
54294 by: martin langhoff
54296 by: Thomas Holton
54297 by: Mark Delany
54298 by: Adam McKenna
54299 by: Mark Delany
?
54290 by: richard morris
54293 by: Charles Cazabon
Help! not working after upgrade from sendmail to qmail!
54295 by: Vincent Chan
Re: Arg! relay problems
54300 by: Timothy Legant
54306 by: kurth.macopensource.com
Re: a little more insight!
54301 by: Benjamin Lee
54305 by: kurth.macopensource.com
54307 by: Timothy Legant
54317 by: Benjamin Lee
Source RPM
54308 by: Davi
54314 by: Sean Reifschneider
Problem when starting qmail.
54309 by: Grant
relaying?
54312 by: Kurth Bemis
54313 by: Grant
can't remove relay-ctrl
54316 by: jackshaw.263.net.cn
user with no Maildir
54318 by: Ami Shamril
Merry Christmas everyone.... and have a Great New Year too!
54319 by: Luke Chiam
qmail Clustering
54321 by: Joomy Studio
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From were can i get....... accustamp
Thankyou......
Seby...
Seby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From were can i get....... accustamp
accustamp is a part of older version of Dan Bernstein's daemontools package.
The functionality of accustamp has been put into multilog, which replaces
cyclog.
If you need accustamp, you'll have to go back to daemontools 0.53 (?), I think.
If you just need to timestamp stuff, use multilog from the current
daemontools and give it a 't' option.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Seby wrote:
> From were can i get....... accustamp
>
> Thankyou......
Charles has already said you can get it from daemontools-0.53 (or
less). However, I've got one in perl if you'd like. It works under
Solaris and Linux.
You'll need to have run h2ph on the /usr/include/* files for it to
work.
--
Regards
Peter
----------
Peter Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.e-smith.org (development) http://www.e-smith.com (corporate)
Phone: +1 613 368 4398 Fax: +1 613 564 7739
e-smith, inc. 1500-150 Metcalfe St, Ottawa, ON K2P 1P1 Canada
"If you kill all your unhappy customers, you'll only have happy ones left"
###########################################################################
#!/pkgs/bin/perl
#
# Return the time as accurately as possible using the gettimeofday()
# system call.
#
require 'sys/syscall.ph';
while(<STDIN>)
{
print &accustamp, " $_";
}
sub accustamp
{
my($tv, $secs, $usecs);
# allocate sufficient space for the tv struct
$tv = pack("LI", 0, 0);
syscall(&SYS_gettimeofday, $tv, 0);
($secs, $usecs) = unpack("LI", $tv);
return $secs + $usecs / 1E6;
}
Hi All !
I have problem with dilivering message from outern mail server to local
mail server
Outern (Sendmail), Local(QMail). While dilivering i have got hext
message
The original message was received at Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:34:58 +0200
from t-rex.net.consul [192.168.1.204]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(expanded from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
552 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message is too large; 1000000 bytes max
554 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Service unavailable
I have tested this situation in case dilevering message directly to
local mail server
5MB message and I haven't any errors.
Anybody can help me.
Thnx.
ROMUL
I am running Open BSD 2.8 and Qmail. I am calling SMTP and POP using
TCPServer with the ff script:
if [ -x /usr/local/bin/tcpserver ]; then
echo -n ' Qmail-SMTP'; /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -v -u
7791
-g 2108 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
2>&1 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3 &
fi
if [ -x /usr/local/bin/tcpserver ]; then
echo -n ' Qmail-POP'; /usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 pop3
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popu
p geek.infinitymalls.com \ /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d
Maildir &
fi
My problem is I cannot authenticate using POP. I get an "authorization
failed" error message. When I used Inetd to call POP, I am able to
authenticate without any problems. Any ideas?
To all qmail members,
I am completely new to qmail. I developed one application related to mail
system. According to my requirement I want to collect all my mail messages
to one particular system account. I achieve same functionality with Sendmail
in Linux.
My system configuration is give below.
I user RedHat 6.2 Linux
Domain name is : myserver.com
Just for example I have following system account in my system
1: user_a (email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
2: user_b (email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
3: user_c (email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
4: user_d (email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
.............
.............
.............
n: alluser (email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Now, I want to achieve following functionality,
When [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail in his mail box automatically that
mail is also available in [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it means direct copy). Same
way if any user like (user_b, user_c,.....) receives any mail then all mail
is also available in my alluser account. So my alluser account contains all
mails received through @myserver.com domain.
The second functionality is, if some user say notexist is not available in
my system and if my system receive mail with that address then automatically
it send an bounce message to sender. I want to disable this bounce back
feature if user not found. If user exist or not exist, my system accept all
messages in [EMAIL PROTECTED] user,
I achieve above functionality with sendmail like this way,
I added following two lines in my sendmail.mc file
define('LUSER_REPLY','local:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
feature('virtusertable','hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable')
and I remove allmasquerade feature so system never generate bounce back
message to sender if user is not exist.
My /etc/mail/virtusertable file contains only one line.
@myserver.com alluser
So with this line allmessages is available to my alluser account.
I just setup qmail according to installation instruction and I successfully
receive and send all messages. But how I setup my above requirements. In
sendmail we have one main file called sendmail.mc is there any file for
qmail setting ?
Regards,
Bhavesh.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Bhavesh Vakil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To all qmail members,
Don't post the same message to the mailing list twice, just becuase you haven't
received an answer yet. It's rude. Besides, there have been at least two
followups on the mailing list which answered your questions.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe you are seeking the queue_extra settings in extra.h in
the qmail source. You need to download the source package
and read some documentation on what modifications you make
to the source. Good luck!
Nathan Harmon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bhavesh Vakil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 8:49 AM
Subject: URGENT : Forward all mails in one account.
> To all qmail members,
>
> I am completely new to qmail. I developed one application related to mail
> system. According to my requirement I want to collect all my mail messages
> to one particular system account. I achieve same functionality with
Sendmail
> in Linux.
>
> My system configuration is give below.
>
> I user RedHat 6.2 Linux
> Domain name is : myserver.com
> Just for example I have following system account in my system
> 1: user_a (email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 2: user_b (email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 3: user_c (email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 4: user_d (email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> .............
> .............
> .............
> n: alluser (email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> Now, I want to achieve following functionality,
>
> When [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail in his mail box automatically that
> mail is also available in [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it means direct copy).
Same
> way if any user like (user_b, user_c,.....) receives any mail then all
mail
> is also available in my alluser account. So my alluser account contains
all
> mails received through @myserver.com domain.
>
> The second functionality is, if some user say notexist is not available in
> my system and if my system receive mail with that address then
automatically
> it send an bounce message to sender. I want to disable this bounce back
> feature if user not found. If user exist or not exist, my system accept
all
> messages in [EMAIL PROTECTED] user,
>
> I achieve above functionality with sendmail like this way,
>
> I added following two lines in my sendmail.mc file
>
> define('LUSER_REPLY','local:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> feature('virtusertable','hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable')
>
> and I remove allmasquerade feature so system never generate bounce back
> message to sender if user is not exist.
>
> My /etc/mail/virtusertable file contains only one line.
> @myserver.com alluser
>
> So with this line allmessages is available to my alluser account.
>
> I just setup qmail according to installation instruction and I
successfully
> receive and send all messages. But how I setup my above requirements. In
> sendmail we have one main file called sendmail.mc is there any file for
> qmail setting ?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Bhavesh.
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
Bhavesh Vakil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail in his mail box automatically that
> mail is also available in [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it means direct copy). Same
> way if any user like (user_b, user_c,.....) receives any mail then all mail
> is also available in my alluser account. So my alluser account contains all
> mails received through @myserver.com domain.
As noted elsewhere, you could do this with the QUEUE_EXTRA functionality,
and a filter to only capture incoming mail. See Dan's qmail FAQ about
"How do I keep a copy of all mail?" or similar.
You could also have .qmail files for every user in your system (except
all_users) which forward a copy to all_users@your_domain.
> The second functionality is, if some user say notexist is not available in
> my system and if my system receive mail with that address then automatically
> it send an bounce message to sender. I want to disable this bounce back
> feature if user not found. If user exist or not exist, my system accept all
> messages in [EMAIL PROTECTED] user,
The .qmail file ~alias/.qmail-default will handle all mail which doesn't
match another local user or more specific alias.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's
the command we use:
/usr/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
2>&1 | multilog t s200000000 n50 \
!'tai64nlocal | gzip'
/usr/qmail/log/SMTP/ &
Unfortunately, multilog doesn't honor "s" parameter
arguments that big. Anyway, when rotating the log, multilog pipes it through
tai64nlocal to store readable timestamps and also compresses the archive with
gzip. The only downside is that the "current" logfile still has tai
timestamps.
Dave
Hi,
I'm wondering what
is the correct use of this command (TAI64NLOCAL) inside the supervise
scripts.
I have three
run scripts in /var/qmail/supervise... and they look like:
exec setuidgid
qmaill multilog t s2000000 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d
The other two are
similar.
I don't want the
TAI timestamps @.... in the log files anymore (they are
frightening!!)
Other suggestions
about more options in the scripts are also welcome.
Thank you in
advance.
Marco Santini
Hi,
I am trying to get a better understanding of the interoperation and I have tried
the archives but can't find the answer I am looking for.
I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand how the programs
qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the multilog program. I see that they
are both started independently and that multilog accepts input in STDIN, but
I don't see how qmail-* knows about multilog and knows to send to its STDIN.
Further adding to my confusion is the line in section 2.9 "Note that using these
instructions, logging will be accomplished by multilog, not splogger". My
/var/qmail/rc
file (from LWQ)states 'qmail-start ./Maildir splogger qmail'. That tells me
that splogger is being used.
Can someone please describe the link for me? Why does LWQ say to put splogger
on qmail-start command line if it does not even get used?
much thanks.
rich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 December 2000 at 16:29:07
GMT
> I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand
> how the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the
> multilog program. I see that they are both started independently
> and that multilog accepts input in STDIN, but I don't see how
> qmail-* knows about multilog and knows to send to its STDIN.
LWQ is recommending a setup where qmail-send and tcpserver are both
run under supervise, which in turn is under control of svscan, am I
remembering this right?
In that scenario, svscan recognizes the need for a second supervise to
do logging by the presence of the 't' bit in the directory permissions
on the directory for the service.
> Further adding to my confusion is the line in section 2.9 "Note
> that using these instructions, logging will be accomplished by
> multilog, not splogger". My /var/qmail/rc file (from LWQ)states
> 'qmail-start ./Maildir splogger qmail'. That tells me that
> splogger is being used.
> Can someone please describe the link for me? Why does LWQ say to
> put splogger on qmail-start command line if it does not even get
> used?
I'm not sure; is this perhaps vestigial, or to cover the possibility
that something will emit output even though it's not expected?
--
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am trying to get a better understanding of the interoperation and I
>have tried the archives but can't find the answer I am looking for.
>
>I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand how
>the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the multilog
>program. I see that they are both started independently and that
>multilog accepts input in STDIN, but I don't see how qmail-* knows
>about multilog and knows to send to its STDIN.
svscan is the missing link, as dd-b pointed out.
>Further adding to my confusion is the line in section 2.9 "Note that
>using these instructions, logging will be accomplished by multilog,
>not splogger". My /var/qmail/rc file (from LWQ)states 'qmail-start
>./Maildir splogger qmail'. That tells me that splogger is being
>used.
The LWQ /var/qmail/rc file does *not* specify splogger. Check again.
-Dave
richard morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone tried to use the ETRN command from behind a router using NAT. Our
> problem is we can send out the ETRN command to port 25 on the ISP's box but
> they cannot come in?
Does your router know which server to forward the incoming connection
to? I've seen that problem several times with our customers.
--
"I live in the heart of the machine. We are one."
Our use of MAPS-RBL filtering on our Qmail servers has been in
place for over a year with very few complaints about inaccessibility.
Lately a couple of intended correspondents have been ruled out by
the system.
Very definitely the "filtered outs" ought to take steps to get off the
RBL lists for their own good.
With that said, however, is it possible to readily build exception-
lists that allow e-mail correspondence with contacts on the RBL
database?
Jerry R. Keene
Senior Systems Analyst
SCS ENGINEERS---1970-2000! Thirty Year Anniversary
Partners With EPA Through The Landfill Methane Outreach Program
Phone: 703.471.6150
Fax: 703.471.6676
http://www.scsengineers.com
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:36:05PM -0500, Jerry Keene wrote:
> Our use of MAPS-RBL filtering on our Qmail servers has been in
> place for over a year with very few complaints about inaccessibility.
>
> Lately a couple of intended correspondents have been ruled out by
> the system.
>
> Very definitely the "filtered outs" ought to take steps to get off the
> RBL lists for their own good.
>
> With that said, however, is it possible to readily build exception-
> lists that allow e-mail correspondence with contacts on the RBL
> database?
In your tcp.smtp file used by tcpserver:
# allow this IP through
10.10.10.10:allow,RBLSMTPD=""
Conversely, to block someone not in the list:
# hostgo.com are spamming bastards 9/24/00
209.217.19.180:allow,RBLSMTPD="-Hostgo spam is not wanted here"
jon
Thanks Jon.
Jerry R. Keene
Senior Systems Analyst
SCS ENGINEERS---1970-2000! Thirty Year Anniversary
Partners With EPA Through The Landfill Methane Outreach Program
Phone: 703.471.6150
Fax: 703.471.6676
http://www.scsengineers.com
Hi folks,
This may or may not belong here, but hopefully someone's done this before.
Is there something out there to provide secure web access to mailboxes,
which works well with Qmail ?
Any pointers will be appreciated.
Jean
Lots of em, try looking on freshmeat.net.
sqwebmail and the IMP are most common I would think.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean Caron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Qmail & Web
Hi folks,
This may or may not belong here, but hopefully someone's done this before.
Is there something out there to provide secure web access to mailboxes,
which works well with Qmail ?
Any pointers will be appreciated.
Jean
Jean Caron wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> This may or may not belong here, but hopefully someone's done this before.
>
> Is there something out there to provide secure web access to mailboxes,
> which works well with Qmail ?
>
> Any pointers will be appreciated.
> Jean
We use Squirrel Mail (http://www.squirrelmail.org/). Very nice.
--
Brendon Colby
System Administrator
Midcontinent Internet
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Tim Hunter wrote:
> Lots of em, try looking on freshmeat.net.
>
> sqwebmail and the IMP are most common I would think.
I like TWIG very much. See http://www.screwdriver.net/twig
Regards,
Siaco.
--
Ryszard Łach, Internet Designers s.c., Przedmiejska 6-10, 54-201 Wrocław
'echo "" |mail -s "send key pub" [EMAIL PROTECTED]' for my public GPG key
Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend
> this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers
> with 512MB each.
Virus scanners don't solve the problem.
http://www.fefe.de/antivirus/42.zip
Felix
Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 December 2000 at 19:54:33 +0100
> Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend
> > this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers
> > with 512MB each.
>
> Virus scanners don't solve the problem.
And police don't solve the problem of crime, and schools don't solve
the problem of ignorance, and locks don't solve the problem of
burglars. I still think it's stupid not to have locks on the doors to
your house, even though they (and the police) don't completely solve
the problem.
Possibly virus scanners don't solve the problem, and are still useful?
--
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
Yes they do. But they can also be misused, by for instance the zip file you
provided the link for. My servers did'nt take harm of this file, but I'm
sure that if I did'nt have the free disk space I have on my servers, they
would.
I'm not sure what qmail-scanner does if the process running out of disk
space. If it removes the uncompressed files, or if it leaves it there. I'll
better test that ;-)
Of course the server would have problems when several instances would
connect sending this file, and this will happen with qmail-scanner since
qmail-scanner-queue.pl don't terminate the smtp session until the mail is
finnished scanned. This would make the other server timeout, resending the
mail.
Then again, qmail-scanner/perlscan_scanner provides the ability to deny the
mail based on the attachement being of type .zip and of size 42374 bytes
solving that problem.
I guess both of us can agree on the fact that there is a lot of different
ways to make malicious damage to mailservers.
--
--------------------------------------------
IDG New Media Einar Bordewich
Development Manager Phone: +47 2336 1420
E-Mail: eibo(at)newmedia.no
--------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Felix von Leitner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "qmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
> Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly
recomend
> > this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc.
servers
> > with 512MB each.
>
> Virus scanners don't solve the problem.
>
> http://www.fefe.de/antivirus/42.zip
>
> Felix
>
So, do u use the external viru scan software?
or only the qmail-scan defaut?
Which external viru scanner r u using?
how big is the difference both on speed and secutiy?
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:34:35 +0100
"Einar Bordewich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend
> this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers
> with 512MB each.
> Also running the QMAILQUEUE patch with no problems.
>
> Here are the viruses trapped since 23/08/2000 15:30:48, and I must say that
> this solution is doing it's job.
>
> 230 virus TROJ_NAVIDAD.A
> 202 virus VBS_LOVELETTR.AS
> 58 virus TROJ_MTX.A
> 53 virus VBS_KAKWORM.A
> 33 virus TROJ_HYBRIS.B
> 23 virus VBS_LOVELETTER-O
> 22 virus VBS_COLOMBIA
> 21 virus TROJ_PRETTY_PARK
> 19 virus PE_CIH
> 18 virus TROJ_SKA
> 15 virus PE_MTX.A
> 13 virus W97M_ETHAN.A
> 13 Possibly a misdisinfected virus
> 12 Love Letter Virus/Trojan
> 12 virus VBS_STAGES.A
> 10 Joke program
> 7 virus W97M_THUS
> 6 virus JOKE_WOW
> 6 virus JOKE_FLIPPED
> 5 virus JOKE_RABBIT
> 5 virus JOKE_CURSOR.A
> 5 the W97M/Thus.gen virus !!!
> 4 virus JOKE_GESCHENK
> 4 virus JOKE_BUTTONS
> 4 the WScript/Kak.worm virus !!!
> 3 virus WM_CAP
> 3 virus W97M_MARKER
> 3 virus TROJ_HYBRIS.D
> 3 the JS/Kak@M virus !!!
> 2 Joke/Win-Wobble
> 2 Joke/Cokegift
> 2 virus W97M_WRENCH.E
> 2 virus W97M_OCARD.A
> 2 virus W97M_CLASS.Q
> 2 virus TROJ_SHOCKWAVE.A
> 2 virus O97M_TRISTATE
> 2 virus JOKE_SMALLPEN
> 2 virus JOKE_POINTER.A
> 2 virus JOKE_KNIJPME
> 2 virus JOKE_32
> 2 the JS/Kak.worm virus !!!
> 1 Happy99 Trojan
> 1 virus X97M_LAROUX.JH
> 1 virus X97M_LAROUX.BU
> 1 virus WM_MENTAL.A
> 1 virus W97M_TITCH.A
> 1 virus W97M_THUS.I
> 1 virus W97M_SELIUQ.B
> 1 virus W97M_SATELLITE
> 1 virus W97M_PRI.B
> 1 virus W97M_Generic
> 1 virus W97M_CLASS.QA
> 1 virus W97M_CHACK
> 1 virus W97M_BDOC2X
> 1 virus W97M_A_OPEY_03
> 1 virus TROJ_COCED.240
> 1 virus JOKE_FREIBIER.B
> 1 virus JOKE_DEL_WINDOWS
> 1 the W97M/Nalp.gen virus !!!
> 1 the W95/MTX@M virus !!!
> 1 the W32/Pretty.worm.gen virus !!!
> 1 the W32/MTX@M virus !!!
> 1 the BackDoor-HO.cli trojan !!!
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------
> IDG New Media Einar Bordewich
> Development Manager Phone: +47 2336 1420
> E-Mail: eibo(at)newmedia.no
> --------------------------------------------
>
Hi guys and gals,
I can't compile qmail-scanner on solaris 8.
uudecode fails with an option error
____________________________________________________________________________
__________
bash-2.03# CC=gcc ./configure --admin postmaster --domain
trevda.com --archive /var/spool/qmailscan --install
This script will search your system for the virus scanners it knows
about, and will ensure that all external programs
qmail-scanner-queue.pl uses are explicitly pathed for performance
reasons.
It will then generate qmail-scanner-queue.pl - it is up to you to install it
correctly.
Continue? ([Y]/N)
y
Usage: grep -hblcnsviw pattern file . . .
broken uudecoder on your system - cannot use uudecode component
Error msg: test-uudecode.tst: No such file or directory
Found tnef on your system! That means we'll be able to decode stupid
M$ attachments :-)
The following binaries and scanners were found on your system:
reformime=/usr/local/bin/reformime
unzip=/usr/bin/unzip
tnef=/usr/local/bin/tnef
If that looks correct, I will now generate qmail-scanner-queue.pl
for your system...
Continue? ([Y]/N)
________________________________________________________________
Is there a patch for it to work on solaris or do i have to edit the
"configure" file myself?
Thks
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "qmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 09:00:38PM +0100, Ruprecht Helms wrote:
> > Am Die, 19 Dez 2000 schrieb Eric Wang:
> > > Hi, guys
> > >
> > > I am thinking to apply the Qmail-scanner to block the virus
attachement,
> >
> > better you try Amavis Scanner. The qmail-scanner is buggy and there
isn't
> > a fix for the wanted patch qmailscanner is asking for.
>
> Please don't report FUD about my work! :-)
>
> Qmail-Scanner is NOT buggy. The patch referred to on the homepage DOES
work
> and works for (almost) everyone who tries it. I'd guess your system has a
> broken patch program or you are just calling it incorrectly.
>
> Is there anyone out there with an altered distribution of qmail-1.03 that
> contains the QMAILQUEUE patch? Pointing people to such a beast would
> certainly allow some less experienced people to get going...
>
> http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/
>
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Jason Haar
>
> Unix/Special Projects, Trimble NZ
> Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:45:41AM +0800, Paul Tan wrote:
> Hi guys and gals,
>
> I can't compile qmail-scanner on solaris 8.
> uudecode fails with an option error
> broken uudecoder on your system - cannot use uudecode component
>
> Error msg: test-uudecode.tst: No such file or directory
Please join the Qmail-Scanner mailing-list. The Qmail list is busy enough
without everyone having to worry about all sundrey related packages...
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
BTW: The compile didn't fail: "cannot use uudecode component" is what
happened. You have ended up with a Qmail-Scanner that just doesn't
internally support uuencoded files. If the commercial scanner you are using
in conjunction with Qmail-Scanner supports uuencode, then you have no
problem anyway.
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Unix/Special Projects, Trimble NZ
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail,
and then i started qmail using csh because svscan did not start it in
enough time. now i have this message in my /var/log/messages file:
Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
dont know how to fix this either, it has been doing this now for about 45
minutes... any ideas?
thanks,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:42:57AM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote:
>
> Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail,
Well, svscan doesn't affect the performance of qmail - it affects the
manageability and reliability of starting qmail.
> and then i started qmail using csh because svscan did not start it in
> enough time. now i have this message in my /var/log/messages file:
>
> Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
>
> dont know how to fix this either, it has been doing this now for about 45
> minutes... any ideas?
This is actually a general Unix admin question, but be that as it
may...
You could have made make life a lot easier by showing us the inittab
entry. Did you double-check that your inittab entry is correct? Did
you read the inittab man page to understand what it's trying to do?
How does that gel with the inittab entry you created?
My guess is that you've got the path wrong to svscan or that the path
points to something that isn't executable or that you've asked svscan
to scan a directory that doesn't exist.
Regards.
Thomas,
I'm finding theexact same problem here. I guess you are installing from
Bruce's RPM packages ... well it seems that there is some kind of
version mismatch between the packages.
I couldn't solve it yet. I'd say you should check which are the
recommended verisons of the daemontools package and the
supervise-scripts package... that's the path I'm following.
martin
Thomas Holton wrote:
> Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
Thanks for your prompt reply.
The commands i put into the inittab file are the ones given in the
documentation:
SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin
svscan /service </dev/null >/dev/console 2>/dev/console
since svscan is located /usr/local/bin, it is clearly in the path.
Besides, the message is talking about respawning too fast... it is still
doing it at this time as well. Any other information you can give is
greatly appreciated!
> On 20 Dec 2000, Mark Delany wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:42:57AM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail,
> >
> > Well, svscan doesn't affect the performance of qmail - it affects the
> > manageability and reliability of starting qmail.
> >
> > > and then i started qmail using csh because svscan did not start it in
> > > enough time. now i have this message in my /var/log/messages file:
> > >
> > > Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
> > >
> > > dont know how to fix this either, it has been doing this now for about 45
> > > minutes... any ideas?
> >
> > This is actually a general Unix admin question, but be that as it
> > may...
> >
> > You could have made make life a lot easier by showing us the inittab
> > entry. Did you double-check that your inittab entry is correct? Did
> > you read the inittab man page to understand what it's trying to do?
> > How does that gel with the inittab entry you created?
> >
> > My guess is that you've got the path wrong to svscan or that the path
> > points to something that isn't executable or that you've asked svscan
> > to scan a directory that doesn't exist.
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
>
Actually mine is an install from the source which i have done. so i bet
our problem is not the same then huh?
unfortunately i downloaded the most recent version, so i wonder how i
should go about this now?
still no clue here so i suppose i should go back and try installing again.
-tom
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I'm finding theexact same problem here. I guess you are installing from
> Bruce's RPM packages ... well it seems that there is some kind of
> version mismatch between the packages.
>
> I couldn't solve it yet. I'd say you should check which are the
> recommended verisons of the daemontools package and the
> supervise-scripts package... that's the path I'm following.
>
>
> martin
>
> Thomas Holton wrote:
> > Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:50:05PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote:
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply.
> The commands i put into the inittab file are the ones given in the
> documentation:
>
> SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin
> svscan /service </dev/null >/dev/console 2>/dev/console
All on one line?
SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin svscan /service
</dev/null >/dev/console 2>/dev/console
Are there any messages on /dev/console?
What happens if you start up svscan manually?
# cd /
# /usr/local/bin/svscan /service
Show us the output.
Regards.
>
> since svscan is located /usr/local/bin, it is clearly in the path.
> Besides, the message is talking about respawning too fast... it is still
> doing it at this time as well. Any other information you can give is
> greatly appreciated!
>
>
> > On 20 Dec 2000, Mark Delany wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:42:57AM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail,
> > >
> > > Well, svscan doesn't affect the performance of qmail - it affects the
> > > manageability and reliability of starting qmail.
> > >
> > > > and then i started qmail using csh because svscan did not start it in
> > > > enough time. now i have this message in my /var/log/messages file:
> > > >
> > > > Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
> > > >
> > > > dont know how to fix this either, it has been doing this now for about 45
> > > > minutes... any ideas?
> > >
> > > This is actually a general Unix admin question, but be that as it
> > > may...
> > >
> > > You could have made make life a lot easier by showing us the inittab
> > > entry. Did you double-check that your inittab entry is correct? Did
> > > you read the inittab man page to understand what it's trying to do?
> > > How does that gel with the inittab entry you created?
> > >
> > > My guess is that you've got the path wrong to svscan or that the path
> > > points to something that isn't executable or that you've asked svscan
> > > to scan a directory that doesn't exist.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > >
> >
>
Thomas,
I am guessing it's an issue with supervise scripts. Thy've gone from
2.x to 3.x and there things stopped working for me. The problem is that
I haven't been able to replace 3.1 with 2.4 in a clean way.
martin
Thomas Holton wrote:
> still no clue here so i suppose i should go back and try installing again.
> -tom
Thanks again:
> > SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin
> > svscan /service </dev/null >/dev/console 2>/dev/console
>
> All on one line?
no, makes up two lines
> Are there any messages on /dev/console?
no, there is nothing in /dev/console/
>
> What happens if you start up svscan manually?
>
> # cd /
> # /usr/local/bin/svscan /service
>
> Show us the output.
many messages:
supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-smtpd/run: access denied
supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-send/run: file does not exist
supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: access denied
and actually these messages are many times each.
The permissions for /var/qmail/ are me with grp qmail. For whom should
they be permissioned?
thanks!
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:32:46PM -0300, martin langhoff wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I am guessing it's an issue with supervise scripts. Thy've gone from
> 2.x to 3.x and there things stopped working for me. The problem is that
> I haven't been able to replace 3.1 with 2.4 in a clean way.
I don't know what this 2.x and 3.x refers to - certainly not svscan
from cr.yp.to, but in any event, svscan does not deal with the
supervise scripts, supervise does.
> > still no clue here so i suppose i should go back and try installing again.
I guess that's one way to get a clue as to what's going on. Not my
first choice though.
Regards.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:39:54PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote:
> many messages:
> supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-smtpd/run: access denied
> supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-send/run: file does not exist
> supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: access denied
Are these log entries not explicit enough for you? Generally scripts need to
be executable and exist if you expect them to be run.
--Adam
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:39:54PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote:
>
> Thanks again:
>
> > > SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin
> > > svscan /service </dev/null >/dev/console 2>/dev/console
> >
> > All on one line?
> no, makes up two lines
Right. It needs to be one line.
> > Are there any messages on /dev/console?
> no, there is nothing in /dev/console/
Once you make it one line you'll get them. You need to signal init
every time you change this file. Read the man pages on init and initab
to get an understanding of this mechanism.
> > What happens if you start up svscan manually?
> >
> > # cd /
> > # /usr/local/bin/svscan /service
> >
> > Show us the output.
> many messages:
> supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-smtpd/run: access denied
> supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-send/run: file does not exist
> supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: access denied
You have a serious number of install errors. You should re-check every
step you made to ensure you followed the instructions exactly. The
errors you are getting occur when people don't follow instructions
to the letter.
And I do mean EXACTLY TO THE LETTER.
I suggest that for each step you do in the install, you then check
that what you've done is correct. If the instruct says to create a
file, do a cat to check it. If the instruction says to set a mode, use
an ls -l to check it. If you make a synmlink, make sure that it links
with ls -lL. Better yet, get a friend or peer to check each step with
you.
If the instructions aren't absolutely clear to you or your peer, ask
what they mean, don't guess. This list knows only too well that
guessers get it wrong - invariably.
Here's a simple example. What made you split the inittab entry into
two lines? Did you guess that it was ok?
Regards.
hi i seem to be having a problem with local deliveries. after a reboot 3-4
local deliveries will be completed. then everything just seems to queue? i
have checked the log files and i'm not quite sure what it is i'm looking for
[newborn to linux / unix / qmail world]. there is an entry about spawn
dying. sorry to be so brief but have not had time focus on it. any ideas?
richard morris.
richard morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi i seem to be having a problem with local deliveries. after a reboot 3-4
> local deliveries will be completed. then everything just seems to queue? i
> have checked the log files and i'm not quite sure what it is i'm looking for
> [newborn to linux / unix / qmail world]. there is an entry about spawn
> dying.
Is it qmail-lspawn that's dying? After mail starts to queue up, do a
`ps auxwww | grep qmail`. Post the results here.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't have problem with sendmail. i've just upgrade to qmail few days ago
and got this strange problem. some of the remote side randomly gives error
500! especially to aol and psi.net. any ideas?
(my system is running bruceg's qmail 1.03+patch rpm on RH6.2)
> Dec 18 17:45:23 localhost qmail: 977190323.707203 starting delivery 147:
msg
> 18384 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dec 18 17:45:23 ms qmail: 977190323.708073 starting delivery 148: msg
18384
> to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dec 18 17:48:56 ms qmail: 977190536.030830 delivery 147: success:
> 38.8.139.2_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_OK_id=147wqV-0002PD-00/
> Dec 18 17:49:25 ms qmail: 977190565.930745 delivery 148: failure:
>
Connected_to_38.8.139.2_but_sender_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:_500_Comma
> nd_unrecognized
>
thanks in advance,
rgds,
Vincent
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:28:52PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm having one heck of a time getting qmail-smtpd to allow mu users to
> send mail.
>
> my /etc/tcp.smtp file looks as such.
>
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 216.177.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> :allow
>
> then after saving that i run
>
> tcprules tcp.smtp.cdb tcp.smtp.temp < tcp.smtp
>
> and that goes through ok
>
> when i run
>
> tcprulescheck /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb
>
> i get this.
>
> rule :
> allow connection
Try tcprulescheck /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb 216.177.2.1 <-- 1 can be any valid
IP address on your
site.
man tcprulescheck for more information.
> what gives....then i connect to usaexpress.net:25 i get dropped .....
>
> any ideas?
>
> ~kurth
>
-thl
I'm having one heck of a time getting qmail-smtpd to allow mu users to
send mail.
my /etc/tcp.smtp file looks as such.
127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
216.177.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
:allow
then after saving that i run
tcprules tcp.smtp.cdb tcp.smtp.temp < tcp.smtp
and that goes through ok
when i run
tcprulescheck /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb
i get this.
rule :
allow connection
what gives....then i connect to usaexpress.net:25 i get dropped .....
any ideas?
~kurth
Hmm... check user and exec permissions on the file 'qmail-smtpd-wrapper'?
That's all I can think of. Then maybe try another script that doesn't do
much -- etc...
Later,
Ben.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:07:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/smtpd
>
> 977352942.017873 tcpserver: ok 4501 usa.usaexpress.net:206.183.143.244:25
> zmamail02.zma.compaq.com:161.114.64.102::2564
> 977352942.017928 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper: exec format error
> 977352942.018301 tcpserver: end 4501 status 28416
> 977352942.018400 tcpserver: status: 23/40
>
> the contents of qmail-smtpd-wrapper is as follows.
>
> usa:/var/qmail/bin# cat qmail-smtpd-wrapper
> #/bin/bash
> ulimit -d 1024
> exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd ${1+"$@"}
> usa:/var/qmail/bin#
>
> i have a feeling that it may be caused by this line in my
> /etc/init.d/qmail file
>
> supervise /var/supervise/qmail/smtpd tcpserver -v
> -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u$QMAILDUID -g$NOFILESGID
> 0 smtp /var/qmail-smtpd-wrapper 2>&1
> | setuser qmaill accustamp | setuser qmaill cyclog /var/log/qmail/smtpd &
>
> the above is all on one line.
>
> i'm at wits end with this......can anyone help me out?
>
> ~kurth
>
--
B. http://makelinux.org/ "Always real." http://realthought.net/
__________________________________________________________________________
It's hard to get ivory in Africa, but in Alabama the Tuscaloosa.
-- Groucho Marx
diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/smtpd
977352942.017873 tcpserver: ok 4501 usa.usaexpress.net:206.183.143.244:25
zmamail02.zma.compaq.com:161.114.64.102::2564
977352942.017928 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper: exec format error
977352942.018301 tcpserver: end 4501 status 28416
977352942.018400 tcpserver: status: 23/40
the contents of qmail-smtpd-wrapper is as follows.
usa:/var/qmail/bin# cat qmail-smtpd-wrapper
#/bin/bash
ulimit -d 1024
exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd ${1+"$@"}
usa:/var/qmail/bin#
i have a feeling that it may be caused by this line in my
/etc/init.d/qmail file
supervise /var/supervise/qmail/smtpd tcpserver -v
-x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u$QMAILDUID -g$NOFILESGID
0 smtp /var/qmail-smtpd-wrapper 2>&1
| setuser qmaill accustamp | setuser qmaill cyclog /var/log/qmail/smtpd &
the above is all on one line.
i'm at wits end with this......can anyone help me out?
~kurth
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:07:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/smtpd
>
> 977352942.017873 tcpserver: ok 4501 usa.usaexpress.net:206.183.143.244:25
> zmamail02.zma.compaq.com:161.114.64.102::2564
> 977352942.017928 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper: exec format error
> 977352942.018301 tcpserver: end 4501 status 28416
> 977352942.018400 tcpserver: status: 23/40
>
> the contents of qmail-smtpd-wrapper is as follows.
Is this a cut-n-paste or did you type it into your mail message by hand?
If this is really what the script looks like, try adding a "!" after the
"#", as indicated.
> usa:/var/qmail/bin# cat qmail-smtpd-wrapper
> #/bin/bash
^----- add ! here, so it looks like this:
#!/bin/bash
> ulimit -d 1024
> exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd ${1+"$@"}
> usa:/var/qmail/bin#
>
> i have a feeling that it may be caused by this line in my
> /etc/init.d/qmail file
>
> supervise /var/supervise/qmail/smtpd tcpserver -v
> -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u$QMAILDUID -g$NOFILESGID
> 0 smtp /var/qmail-smtpd-wrapper 2>&1
> | setuser qmaill accustamp | setuser qmaill cyclog /var/log/qmail/smtpd &
>
> the above is all on one line.
>
> i'm at wits end with this......can anyone help me out?
>
> ~kurth
>
-thl
> Is this a cut-n-paste or did you type it into your mail message by hand?
> If this is really what the script looks like, try adding a "!" after the
> "#", as indicated.
>
> > usa:/var/qmail/bin# cat qmail-smtpd-wrapper
> > #/bin/bash
> ^----- add ! here, so it looks like this:
> #!/bin/bash
Dang, that was a good pick up! ;-)
Maybe it will work for him now...
Hi guys,
As far as I know, DJB's license allow to build source rpm and distribute it.
The patches are applied at build time and no binaries is distributed.
Does someone can tell me if is it ok?
[]s
Davi
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:03:33PM -0200, Davi wrote:
>As far as I know, DJB's license allow to build source rpm and distribute it.
>The patches are applied at build time and no binaries is distributed.
>Does someone can tell me if is it ok?
It seems to be. I mean, there's a link for SRPMs for QMail off the main
qmail.org page, so he can't be TOO broken up about it...
Sean
--
Windows NT: From the people who brought you 640K and EDLIN
Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
[root@sphinx qmail]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail start
Starting qmail: svscan.
[root@sphinx qmail]# multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current
directory: access denied
I've followed Dave Sill's qmail installation manual.
ok well with the qmail-smtp problems outta the way....
i am confused about relaying rules....
this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file
127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
g4.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
however this does not work...when i send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i get
this message
Can't send to ". The server gives this reason: '553 sorry, that domain
isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts(#5.7.1)'.
as i understand it rcpthosts is the file that holds all the domains that
you have on your machine.
can somebody point me in the right direction?
~kurth
Kurth Bemis - Network/Systems Administrator, USAExpress.net/Ozone Computer
People disagree with me. I just ignore them.
-- Linus Torvalds, regarding the use of C++ for the Linux kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth
PGP key available - http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth/pgp
Fight Weak Encryption! Donate your wasted CPU cycles to Distributed.net
(http://www.distributed.net)
It should be an IP address.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Kurth Bemis wrote:
> ok well with the qmail-smtp problems outta the way....
>
> i am confused about relaying rules....
>
> this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file
>
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> g4.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> however this does not work...when i send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i get
> this message
> Can't send to ". The server gives this reason: '553 sorry, that domain
> isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts(#5.7.1)'.
>
> as i understand it rcpthosts is the file that holds all the domains that
> you have on your machine.
>
> can somebody point me in the right direction?
>
> ~kurth
> Kurth Bemis - Network/Systems Administrator, USAExpress.net/Ozone Computer
>
> People disagree with me. I just ignore them.
> -- Linus Torvalds, regarding the use of C++ for the Linux kernel
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth
> PGP key available - http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth/pgp
>
> Fight Weak Encryption! Donate your wasted CPU cycles to Distributed.net
> (http://www.distributed.net)
>
>
rpm -e ucspi-unix-0.34-1
error: removing these packages would break dependencies:
ucspi-unix is needed by qmail-1.03+patches-16
[root@test bruceg]# rpm -e qmail-1.03+patches-16
error: removing these packages would break dependencies:
qmail >= 1.03+patches is needed by relay-ctrl-2.5-1
[root@test bruceg]# rpm -e relay-ctrl-2.5-1
execution of script failed
what can I do?
Hi...
How to configure mailder-daemon to reply back to the sender (with error
message "No such user" or anything...) if the user don't have Maildir in
their home directory? (Some of the users does not allowed to have email).
TQ in advance.
I hope this is not considered as spamming...
Luke
Hi all,
Just 4 Questions,
1. Are there any archive of qmail-ldap ?
2. How qmail-ldap works on clusting ?
3. Are there any balance dir creation for user's home dir ? like vpopmail or
vmailmgr
4. Can I use qmail-ldap + CourierIMAP with auth ldap from the same ldap of
qmail ?
I'm setting up 200K POP3/IMAP/qmail users.
pls. help.
Thanks in advance.
