qmail Digest 3 Apr 2001 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1323

Topics (messages 60120 through 60185):

qmailmrtg problem
        60120 by: Fadli Syarid
        60121 by: Robin S. Socha
        60124 by: Fadli Syarid

Re: qmail & ezmlm
        60122 by: Noah Sematimba
        60137 by: Paul Jarc

Re: Some Hints?
        60123 by: Kitabjian, Dave
        60132 by: Johan Almqvist
        60166 by: Marco Calistri
        60167 by: Marco Calistri
        60168 by: Marco Calistri
        60177 by: Russell Nelson
        60178 by: Russell Nelson

qmailanalog + tai64
        60125 by: Martin Renner
        60131 by: japc.co.sapo.pt
        60146 by: Martin Renner

Connection to a dedicated MX-Mailserver
        60126 by: Marcus Korte
        60129 by: Charles Cazabon

Re: error rotating logs
        60127 by: Charles Cazabon

Re: Received: (blah...FOR username)
        60128 by: Charles Cazabon

dot qmail problem (HELP NEEDED URGENT)
        60130 by: Wei Yao Gharib
        60161 by: Keary Suska
        60162 by: Charles Cazabon
        60169 by: Wei Yao Gharib
        60170 by: Keary Suska
        60172 by: Keary Suska

Re: www.inter7.com unaccessible
        60133 by: Antonio Dias
        60138 by: Sean C Truman
        60141 by: Magnus Bodin
        60144 by: alexus
        60150 by: Magnus Bodin

Re: quuee
        60134 by: alexus
        60142 by: Magnus Bodin

Re: imap and Maildir
        60135 by: alexus

Aliases & chdir problems
        60136 by: Alex Le Fevre
        60143 by: Charles Cazabon
        60145 by: Johan Almqvist
        60149 by: Alex Le Fevre
        60152 by: Charles Cazabon

How to move messages from ~/Mailbox to ~/Maildir/ ?
        60139 by: Wolfgang Zeikat
        60147 by: japc.co.sapo.pt
        60148 by: Charles Cazabon

mh dir to maildir
        60140 by: Mate Wierdl

qq_trouble_creating_files_in_queue
        60151 by: Milen Petrinski
        60153 by: Charles Cazabon
        60179 by: Milen Petrinski

maildirwatch stay blank!!
        60154 by: Gerhard Mourani
        60155 by: Charles Cazabon

Never gets delivered?
        60156 by: Marcus Ouimet
        60157 by: Kirill Miazine
        60158 by: Charles Cazabon
        60159 by: Marcus Ouimet
        60163 by: Bill Andersen
        60181 by: Kirill Miazine

qmail-autoreponder-0.93
        60160 by: Jairo Marciano Silva

dnscache vs dnscachex
        60164 by: Kirti S. Bajwa
        60171 by: esl
        60173 by: Kirti S. Bajwa
        60174 by: Chris Johnson
        60175 by: Kirti S. Bajwa
        60176 by: Kirti S. Bajwa

smtp-auth + cram-md5 + vpopmail
        60165 by: Martin Kos

Re: How to block an email id in qmail?
        60180 by: Mathew Chandy
        60182 by: Johan Almqvist

How does the splogger work?
        60183 by: Martin Edlman
        60184 by: Frank Tegtmeyer
        60185 by: Frank Tegtmeyer

Administrivia:

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To bug my human owner, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----------------------------------------------------------------------


hi all

i tried to install qmailmrtg-2.3
when i try to make
# make

i got an error message like this

make  all-recursive
Making all in qmailmrtg
"Makefile", line 282: Need an operator
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
*** Error code 1

Stop.
*** Error code 1

Stop.


could somebody help me..?

thanks before





* Fadli Syarid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010402 07:49]:

> make  all-recursive
> Making all in qmailmrtg
> "Makefile", line 282: Need an operator
> make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop.

The Makefile expects gmake, while you are using make.




thanks..
it's work now :)


On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Robin S. Socha wrote:

> * Fadli Syarid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010402 07:49]:
> 
> > make  all-recursive
> > Making all in qmailmrtg
> > "Makefile", line 282: Need an operator
> > make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
> > *** Error code 1
> > 
> > Stop.
> 
> The Makefile expects gmake, while you are using make.
> 





> i make [EMAIL PROTECTED] as maillist ,
> why if i send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , qmail not found this 
> mailbox ,
I hope this is a typo and you meant test-subscribe
> it's work only if i do with manually with ezmlm-sub
> what wrong with my qmail setting .... or ezmlm-idx ?
> 
> note : i use real domain name, whateverdomain.com just for illustration
> 
> dot qmail at /var/qmail/popboxes/test/whateverdomain.com
> 
> .qmail -> /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test/editor
> .qmail-default -> /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test/manager
> .qmail-owner -> /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test/owner
> .qmail-return-default -> /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test/bouncer
> 
> list at /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test
> 
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 popuser  popuser        50 Apr  2 12:51 .qmail -> 
> /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test/editor
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 popuser  popuser        51 Apr  2 12:51 .qmail-default -> 
> /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test/manager
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 popuser  popuser        49 Apr  2 12:51 .qmail-owner -> 
> /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test/owner
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 popuser  popuser        51 Apr  2 12:51 
> .qmail-return-default -> /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test/bouncer
> -rw-------    1 root     root           40 Apr  2 12:54 Log
> drwx------    3 popuser  popuser      4096 Apr  2 12:51 allow
> drwx------    3 popuser  popuser      4096 Apr  2 12:55 archive
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser         0 Apr  2 12:51 archived
> drwx------    2 popuser  popuser      4096 Apr  2 12:51 bounce
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser        93 Apr  2 12:51 bouncer
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser       187 Apr  2 12:51 config
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser       213 Apr  2 12:51 editor
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser       214 Apr  2 12:51 headeradd
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser       137 Apr  2 12:51 headerremove
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser         0 Apr  2 12:51 indexed
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser        17 Apr  2 12:51 inhost
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser         7 Apr  2 12:51 inlocal
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser       256 Apr  2 12:51 key
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser         0 Apr  2 12:51 lock
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser         0 Apr  2 12:51 lockbounce
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser        51 Apr  2 12:51 mailinglist
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser       213 Apr  2 12:51 manager
> drwx------    6 popuser  popuser      4096 Apr  2 12:51 mod
> -rw-r--r--    1 popuser  popuser         4 Apr  2 12:55 num
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser        17 Apr  2 12:51 outhost
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser         7 Apr  2 12:51 outlocal
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser       129 Apr  2 12:51 owner
> -rw-------    1 popuser  popuser         0 Apr  2 12:51 public
> drwx------    2 popuser  popuser      4096 Apr  2 12:54 subscribers
> drwx------    2 popuser  popuser      4096 Apr  2 12:51 text
> 
> in /var/qmail/users/assign
> 
>=whateverdomain.com-test:popuser:509:502:/var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test:::
> 
> in popasswd
> test::popuser:/var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test
> 
> ezmlm-make
> /usr/bin/ezmlm-make /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test 
> /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test/.qmail test whateverdomain.com
> 
> i ready do to with .qmail-test for dot qmail , but the same case ... qmail 
> not found mailbox ....
> 
> /usr/bin/ezmlm-make /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test 
> /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test/.qmail-test test whateverdomain.com
> 
> what wrong .......... ?
> 
> Thanks
> Birds
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 





Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i aready have qmail and ezmlm for maillist,
> i make [EMAIL PROTECTED] as maillist ,
> why if i send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , qmail not found
> this mailbox ,

That should be test-subscribe, as someone else said.

> it's work only if i do with manually with ezmlm-sub
> what wrong with my qmail setting .... or ezmlm-idx ?

You ran ezmlm-sub as root; that breaks things.  To fix:
chown -R popuser:popuser /var/qmail/popboxes/whateverdomain.com/test
In the future, if you use ezmlm-(un)sub, run them as popuser, not root
or any other user.

I think ezmlm-(un)sub ought to print an error and die if it's not
running as the owner of the list.  That would prevent problems of this
sort.


paul




> Second:how to insert new names into /var/qmail/control/rcpthost
> unless edit this file?

Why not just:

        echo "newdomain.com" >> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts  

?

Dave

p.s. Don't forget to do:

        killall -HUP qmail-send




* Marco Calistri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010401 22:12]:
> Second:how to insert new names into /var/qmail/control/rcpthost
> unless edit this file?

Why would you want to do that? I fear that you are trying to put all
domains you want to send mail to into control/rcpthost? You should be
using the RELAYCLIENT="" environment variable, from tcpserver or inetd.

Have you read the documentation?

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

PGP signature






On 02-Apr-2001 Russell Nelson wrote:
> Marco Calistri writes:
>  > Hello,this is my first post on this mailing list.
>  > I wonder if have I any chances to modify header lines
>  > so that qmail reports hostnames instead of IPs:
>  > 
>  > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > Received: (qmail 1236 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2001 16:00:53 -0000
>  > Received: from unknown (HELO box.tin.it) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by
> 192.168.2.1
>  >  with SMTP; 1 Apr 2001 16:00:53 -0000
> 
> qmail will always report an IP address.  If you haven't turned off
> reverse-dns lookups, it will also report the hostname or "unknown".
> If the HELO name differs from the reverse dns lookup, then it will
> print the HELO name.

Hello Russ,I've not DNS server on my machine,I'm using my ISP as
POPMAIL Server.
 
>  > Second:how to insert new names into /var/qmail/control/rcpthost
>  > unless edit this file?
> 
> Why?
 
Because unless doing so,I can't reply to domains not included!!

Marco

> -- 
> -russ nelson will be speaking at http://www.osdn.com/conferences/brie/
> Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | Watch out!  He's got an
> 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | opinion, and he's not
> Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | afraid to share it!





On 02-Apr-2001 Johan Almqvist wrote:
> * Marco Calistri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010401 22:12]:
>> Second:how to insert new names into /var/qmail/control/rcpthost
>> unless edit this file?
> 
> Why would you want to do that? I fear that you are trying to put all
> domains you want to send mail to into control/rcpthost? You should be
> using the RELAYCLIENT="" environment variable, from tcpserver or inetd.
> 
> Have you read the documentation?
> 

I've read not everything and as usual the docs are a lot indeed!
When try to reply and the domain is not into ../rcpthost I get an error.

I start my qmail from inetd using the line:

smtp    stream  tcp     nowait  qmaild  /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd

Sorry for misunderstanding!

Marco

> -Johan
> -- 
> Johan Almqvist
> http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/





On 02-Apr-2001 Kitabjian, Dave wrote:
>> Second:how to insert new names into /var/qmail/control/rcpthost
>> unless edit this file?
> 
> Why not just:
> 
>       echo "newdomain.com" >> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts  
> 
> ?
> 
> Dave
> 
> p.s. Don't forget to do:
> 
>       killall -HUP qmail-send

Many Thanks:it works perfectly!

Marco.




Marco Calistri writes:
 > 
 > On 02-Apr-2001 Russell Nelson wrote:
 > > Marco Calistri writes:
 > >  > Hello,this is my first post on this mailing list.
 > >  > I wonder if have I any chances to modify header lines
 > >  > so that qmail reports hostnames instead of IPs:
 > >  > 
 > >  > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > >  > Received: (qmail 1236 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2001 16:00:53 -0000
 > >  > Received: from unknown (HELO box.tin.it) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by
 > > 192.168.2.1
 > >  >  with SMTP; 1 Apr 2001 16:00:53 -0000
 > > 
 > > qmail will always report an IP address.  If you haven't turned off
 > > reverse-dns lookups, it will also report the hostname or "unknown".
 > > If the HELO name differs from the reverse dns lookup, then it will
 > > print the HELO name.
 > 
 > Hello Russ,I've not DNS server on my machine,I'm using my ISP as
 > POPMAIL Server.

You can't do anything about those headers.  They are a result of your
ISP's brain-damage.  Tell them that they should have reverse DNS
records for all of their IP addresses.

 > >  > Second:how to insert new names into /var/qmail/control/rcpthost
 > >  > unless edit this file?
 > > 
 > > Why?
 >  
 > Because unless doing so,I can't reply to domains not included!!

Look at the file "FAQ" in qmail-1.03.tar.gz.  In it, you'll find a
section numbered "5.4".  Follow the instructiions.

-- 
-russ nelson will be speaking at http://www.osdn.com/conferences/brie/
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | T-568-B rules!
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | T-568-A drools!
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | Go T-568-B !




Kitabjian, Dave writes:
 > > Second:how to insert new names into /var/qmail/control/rcpthost
 > > unless edit this file?
 > 
 > Why not just:
 > 
 >      echo "newdomain.com" >> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts  
 > 
 > ?

Because it's the wrong thing to do (as it turns out).  He's turning
his server into an open relay, in bits and pieces.  I'll bet that you
can already use it to relay to AOL.COM, for example.

 > p.s. Don't forget to do:
 > 
 >      killall -HUP qmail-send

Why?  It's totally unnecessary when modifying rcpthosts.

-- 
-russ nelson will be speaking at http://www.osdn.com/conferences/brie/
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | T-568-B rules!
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | T-568-A drools!
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | Go T-568-B !




Hi.

I am using tai64nfrac to feed my qmail-logs into matchup.

Is there also a small utility to convert the timestamps from matchup back
into a human-readable format?

Martin






On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:50:46PM +0159, Martin Renner wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I am using tai64nfrac to feed my qmail-logs into matchup.
> 
> Is there also a small utility to convert the timestamps from matchup back
> into a human-readable format?
> 

Like, for instance:

# echo "@400000003ac8925a06b75e34" | tai64nlocal
2001-04-02 15:53:04.112680500

# echo "@400000003ac8925a06b75e34" | tai64nfrac
986223184.112680500

# echo "986221654.952383500" | ./tailocal
2001-04-02 15:27:34.952383500

?

> Martin
> 
> 

-- 
Jose Celestino  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Every morning I read the obituaries; if my name's not there,
        I go to work."




Hi.

> # echo "986221654.952383500" | ./tailocal
> 2001-04-02 15:27:34.952383500

And where can I find this tailocal? I just have tai64nlocal. Is it part of a previous 
version of ucspi-tcp?

BTW: The input format is something like

d d 986225876.348359500 986225876.369300500 986225876.381710500 bla bla bla


Martin





Hi all,

is it possible that qmail builds up a connection not to the first MX record
but to the second or third instead?
How to do it?

Best regards,
Marcus

-- 
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net





Marcus Korte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> is it possible that qmail builds up a connection not to the first MX record
> but to the second or third instead?

It's possible.  qmail will try the various records in order of MX distance
until it gets a response.

> How to do it?

It's automatic.  If you want to override this, you can use smtproutes -- see
the qmail documentation for details.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




KY Lui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> i got some mails in my qmail account. the subject of those mail is "errors
> rotating logs"

This has nothing to do with qmail; it's a general Unix system administration
issue.  Please take this up with the support channels for your OS.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




Ken Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> My ISP in the States uses a mail package that puts the targetted recipient in 
> the 'Received' header, as shown in the subject.  
[...]
> Does qmail support this feature (or an equivalent)?

Yes.  qmail records the envelope recipient address (if it's a local domain)
or a variant of it (if it's a virtual domain, or handled by an ~alias/.qmail-*
file) in the Delivered-To: header.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




Hello,
  
   I have RedHat 6.0 and RedHat6.2. There is
qmail-1.03; vpopmail and sqwebmail installed as major
sotwares for mail.
   I tried to create dot-qmail for the virtual users
inside of the vpopmail folders so any new income mail
for that user, it will send an SMS or a email to
another address to notify the new message (which will
contain who is sending and the subject).
    I found some scripts in the mailing list and tried
a simple one just to test:
"| egrep -e '^From:|Subject:' | Mail -s YouGotMail 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
    But the time that I put this in the .qmail and the
user received one new message, it started to send
thousands of email to without stoping until I removed
dot-qmail.
    I tried other scripts that I found in the mailing
list and the same behaviour happened again. I read the
documentation of qmail and the mailing list but I
still cannot find where I am missing.
    Please any help will be very appreciated.

TIA
Wei Yao Gharib

=====
============================================================
Wei Yao Gharib
System Administrator
Wise Communication
N° 1070, Av. Sahara Sect. 5 Hay Salam 11000 Sale Morocco
Tel: +212(0)37810808              Fax: +212(0)37810773
============================================================

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text




Qmail is not very robust when it comes to dealing with errors or unexpected
conditions in .qmail files. The most common response by qmail in such a
situation is to get into an infinite delivery loop. That being said, if I
recall correctly, there is particular behavior of qmail's delivery system
that is effected by the return status of piped programs. I don't recall what
these are, but it could be that a status of 0 (what would be returned by
your command line) may not be the status desired. Another issue could be
that I recall some issues with using piped commands with vpopmail. Since it
is actually vpopmail that handles the final delivery step (you can see this
in the .qmail-default file of your virtual domain directory), it could be
vpopmail that is returning an unexpected result to qmail and causing it to
attempt redelivery. I believe it is qmail-local that handles local
deliveries for qmail--have you read over its docs?

-K

"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to
anger."


> From: Wei Yao Gharib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 07:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: dot qmail problem (HELP NEEDED URGENT)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have RedHat 6.0 and RedHat6.2. There is
> qmail-1.03; vpopmail and sqwebmail installed as major
> sotwares for mail.
> I tried to create dot-qmail for the virtual users
> inside of the vpopmail folders so any new income mail
> for that user, it will send an SMS or a email to
> another address to notify the new message (which will
> contain who is sending and the subject).
> I found some scripts in the mailing list and tried
> a simple one just to test:
> "| egrep -e '^From:|Subject:' | Mail -s YouGotMail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> But the time that I put this in the .qmail and the
> user received one new message, it started to send
> thousands of email to without stoping until I removed
> dot-qmail.
> I tried other scripts that I found in the mailing
> list and the same behaviour happened again. I read the
> documentation of qmail and the mailing list but I
> still cannot find where I am missing.
> Please any help will be very appreciated.
> 
> TIA
> Wei Yao Gharib
> 
> =====
> ============================================================
> Wei Yao Gharib
> System Administrator
> Wise Communication
> N? 1070, Av. Sahara Sect. 5 Hay Salam 11000 Sale Morocco
> Tel: +212(0)37810808              Fax: +212(0)37810773
> ============================================================
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text
> 





Keary Suska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Qmail is not very robust when it comes to dealing with errors or unexpected
> conditions in .qmail files.

What do you base this on?  The experience of the rest of the members of the
list would tend to show that this is simply incorrect.

> The most common response by qmail in such a situation is to get into an
> infinite delivery loop.

A .qmail file won't cause this in general; it normally takes an incorrect
smtproutes setting to cause a mail loop.  Of course, deliveries to commands
can cause all sorts of problems, if the script/command you are delivering to
is buggy.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




Hello,

   I am not using any smtproutes. I tested many
commands in the scripts and all of them is giving the
same results.
   The most simple command that I did :
"| cat >
/home/vpopmail/domains/wisecom.ar.mail.ma/amina/filename"

   And the result was like that:

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13266 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:06 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13259 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:06 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13252 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:06 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13245 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:05 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13238 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:05 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13231 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:05 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13224 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:05 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13217 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:04 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13210 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:04 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13203 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:04 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13196 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:03 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 13189 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:24:03 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 8513 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:22:10 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 8506 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:22:10 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 8499 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:22:10 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 8492 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
16:22:10 -0000
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "gharib abdelhak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 16:09
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 16:22:10 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

hi 1


Please, could tell me where am I missing.

TIA
Wei Yao Gharib



=====
============================================================
Wei Yao Gharib
System Administrator
Wise Communication
N° 1070, Av. Sahara Sect. 5 Hay Salam 11000 Sale Morocco
Tel: +212(0)37810808              Fax: +212(0)37810773
============================================================

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text




>> Qmail is not very robust when it comes to dealing with errors or unexpected
>> conditions in .qmail files.
> 
> What do you base this on?  The experience of the rest of the members of the
> list would tend to show that this is simply incorrect.

In retrospect, it could be true that the issue is with vpopmail, since my
experiences are based only on both, but only if vpopmail is explicitly
reinjecting the email. If it is instead returning a status that does not
indicate to qmail to stop attempting delivery or whatever, qmail should get
the clue that delivery isn't going to happen after some number of failures
(and that shouldn't be thousands). But since I can't say for sure what is
happening, I will have to withdraw my comment for the moment.

-K


> From: Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:19:42 -0600
> To: Qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: dot qmail problem (HELP NEEDED URGENT)
> 
> Keary Suska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> The most common response by qmail in such a situation is to get into an
>> infinite delivery loop.
> 
> A .qmail file won't cause this in general; it normally takes an incorrect
> smtproutes setting to cause a mail loop.  Of course, deliveries to commands
> can cause all sorts of problems, if the script/command you are delivering to
> is buggy.
> 
> Charles
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
> Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 





Who is uid 511? If it is the vpopmail user, then vpopmail is perpetually
reinjecting the email. If it is a qmail user, then it is qmail. I believe
that I recall a problem with vpopmail that it could not handle pipes.
Perhaps this is the problem. To remedy this, you would move your command to
the top level where the .qmail-default is, and use the .qmail-user format,
but you will probably have to include the vpopomail invocations found in
.qmail-default to ensure mail delivery, but you can test that. Also, be sure
that your command line returns a status of 0, which you should force whether
the command line works or not. Better yet, call a shell script.

-K

"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to
anger."


> From: Wei Yao Gharib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: dot qmail problem (HELP NEEDED URGENT)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am not using any smtproutes. I tested many
> commands in the scripts and all of them is giving the
> same results.
> The most simple command that I did :
> "| cat >
> /home/vpopmail/domains/wisecom.ar.mail.ma/amina/filename"
> 
> And the result was like that:
> 
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13266 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:06 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13259 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:06 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13252 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:06 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13245 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:05 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13238 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:05 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13231 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:05 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13224 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:05 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13217 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:04 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13210 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:04 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13203 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:04 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13196 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:03 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 13189 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:24:03 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ...
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 8513 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:22:10 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 8506 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:22:10 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 8499 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:22:10 -0000
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 8492 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001
> 16:22:10 -0000
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "gharib abdelhak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 16:09
> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 16:22:10 GMT
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> hi 1
> 
> 
> Please, could tell me where am I missing.
> 
> TIA
> Wei Yao Gharib
> 
> 
> 
> =====
> ============================================================
> Wei Yao Gharib
> System Administrator
> Wise Communication
> N? 1070, Av. Sahara Sect. 5 Hay Salam 11000 Sale Morocco
> Tel: +212(0)37810808              Fax: +212(0)37810773
> ============================================================
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text
> 






Does anyone know why www.inter7.com is unaccessible? The same is true for
www.vpopmail.cx.

-- 
Antonio Dias





Antonio,

    inter7.com lost their business DSL and is switching back to thier T1.
Ken said it could take up to 30 days.

Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antonio Dias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: OT: www.inter7.com unaccessible


>
> Does anyone know why www.inter7.com is unaccessible? The same is true for
> www.vpopmail.cx.
>
> --
> Antonio Dias
>
>





On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:07:18PM -0300, Antonio Dias wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know why www.inter7.com is unaccessible? The same is true for
> www.vpopmail.cx.
> 

They are changing ISP:s. 

You can however find a fresh copy of www.vpopmail.cx here: 

   http://djb.x42.com/qmail/vpopmail/

and a mirror of www.inter7.com here:

   http://www.inter7.com.m.x42.com/

/magnus

--
http://x42.com/




can I contact them? can I offer them hosting meanwhile they geting their T1?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean C Truman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Antonio Dias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: www.inter7.com unaccessible


> Antonio,
>
>     inter7.com lost their business DSL and is switching back to thier T1.
> Ken said it could take up to 30 days.
>
> Sean
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Antonio Dias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:07 AM
> Subject: OT: www.inter7.com unaccessible
>
>
> >
> > Does anyone know why www.inter7.com is unaccessible? The same is true
for
> > www.vpopmail.cx.
> >
> > --
> > Antonio Dias
> >
> >
>
>





On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:19:19PM -0400, alexus wrote:
>
> can I contact them? can I offer them hosting meanwhile they geting their T1?


You can find a fresh copy of www.vpopmail.cx here:      

   http://djb.x42.com/qmail/vpopmail/

and a mirror of www.inter7.com here:

   http://www.inter7.com.m.x42.com/

/magnus

--
http://x42.com/




hmm

I dont have qmail-qstat 

but qmail-qread shows me queue

thanks

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sean Chittenden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "KIM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: quuee







On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:12:22AM -0400, alexus wrote:
> hmm
> 
> I dont have qmail-qstat 

/var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat 

is part of the distribution.

/magnus

--
http://x42.com/




yes I did..

my imapd recognize Maildir

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 3:10 AM
Subject: Re: imap and Maildir


> Did you install the UW Maildir patch?
>
> > From: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 02:55:43 -0400
> > To: "David Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: imap and Maildir
> >
> > the one that comes with pine package.. i'd assume uw-imapd
> >
> > bash-2.04$ telnet 0 143
> > Trying 0.0.0.0...
> > Connected to 0.
> > Escape character is '^]'.
> > * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4REV1 LOGIN-REFERRALS AUTH=LOGIN]
box.alexus.org
> > IMAP4rev1 2000.287 at Mon, 2 Apr 2001 01:52:35 -0500 (EST)
> >
> > if that's helps...
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 2:25 AM
> > Subject: Re: imap and Maildir
> >
> >
> >> What IMAP server?
> >>
> >>> From: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 02:07:44 -0400
> >>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Subject: imap and Maildir
> >>>
> >>> i start using qmail and I'm using Maildir
> >>>
> >>> i was able to make my imap to understand Maildir
> >>>
> >>> now i need imap to recognize Maildir as a inbox instead of seperate
> > folder
> >>> Maildir
> >>>
> >>> can someone help me here?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>





Since OBSD doesn't seem to want to let me have user
names over 8 characters, I'd like to set up an alias
to a user account to solve the problem. My impression
was that I could just do the following:

1) create /home/alias/.qmail-thealiasname, containing
/home/username/Maildir
2) chown that file to alias:qmail
3) create the user's Maildir, making sure it's owned
by the user
4) Go!

I don't have the domain in virtualdomains, as it's in
locals (in fact, it's the primary domain for the
machine). I didn't figure this to be a problem, as
.qmail-postmaster, .qmail-root, etc., work with that
domain just fine.

What happens, though, is that qmail tries to make the
delivery, and gives me that nasty "unable to chdir to
Maildir (4.2.1)" error. I assume it's trying to access
the user Maildir as the user specified by
.qmail-thealiasname, which obviously isn't right. 

How can I tell it to go in as the user? Alternately,
is there another way to implement this? All I really
care about is getting a 9+ character e-mail address
set up, I'm not finnicky on how I do it.

Thanks,
Alex Le Fevre

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text




Alex Le Fevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since OBSD doesn't seem to want to let me have user names over 8 characters,
> I'd like to set up an alias to a user account to solve the problem. My
> impression was that I could just do the following:
> 
> 1) create /home/alias/.qmail-thealiasname, containing
> /home/username/Maildir

Not quite; that will try to deliver to an mbox file named "Maildir" in
username's homedir, but as user alias.

Chances are that you want that .qmail file to contain "&username" instead,
which will forward the mail from the long name to the short username.
Then, that user's .qmail file (or the system default delivery specification)
will control the final delivery.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




* Alex Le Fevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010402 17:24]:

> Since OBSD doesn't seem to want to let me have user
> names over 8 characters, I'd like to set up an alias
> to a user account to solve the problem. My impression
> was that I could just do the following:
> 
> 1) create /home/alias/.qmail-thealiasname, containing
> /home/username/Maildir
> 2) chown that file to alias:qmail
> 3) create the user's Maildir, making sure it's owned
> by the user
> 4) Go!
> 
> I don't have the domain in virtualdomains, as it's in
> locals (in fact, it's the primary domain for the
> machine). I didn't figure this to be a problem, as
> .qmail-postmaster, .qmail-root, etc., work with that
> domain just fine.
> 
> What happens, though, is that qmail tries to make the
> delivery, and gives me that nasty "unable to chdir to
> Maildir (4.2.1)" error. I assume it's trying to access
> the user Maildir as the user specified by
> .qmail-thealiasname, which obviously isn't right. 
> 
> How can I tell it to go in as the user? Alternately,
> is there another way to implement this? All I really
> care about is getting a 9+ character e-mail address
> set up, I'm not finnicky on how I do it.

As the file ~alias/.qmail-theuser is owned by alias (and should be) it
should contain &usr@me ie the "short" username and one of the local
domains so that qmail forwards and doesn't attempt to deliver as the alias
user.

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

PGP signature





> Not quite; that will try to deliver to an mbox file named "Maildir" in
> username's homedir, but as user alias. 
> 
> Chances are that you want that .qmail file to contain "&username" instead,
> which will forward the mail from the long name to the short username.
> Then, that user's .qmail file (or the system default delivery specification)
> will control the final delivery.

That works nicely. I just have one question: is there any good way to 
control the user's reply-to and from addresses via Qmail? It's showing up as 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's just minor 
cosmetics, though. 

Alex




Alex Le Fevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I just have one question: is there any good way to control the user's
> reply-to and from addresses via Qmail? It's showing up as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's just minor cosmetics, though. 

There are various half-baked solutions, but the ideal way is to set it
at the user's end -- either by specifically setting their MUA to create
the right From: header and envelope sender address in the first place,
or by setting the QMAILUSER/QMAILHOST (or MAILUSER/MAILHOST) environment
variables before they run anything leading to qmail-inject.  Ideally,
just set them in their shell profile/login and be done with it.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




i started our qmail server by accident with Mailbox delivery enabled,
now the incoming mails of about 3 hours went into those files ~/Mailbox.

our regular usage is ~/Maildir/ delivery, and i restarted the server
with ~/Maildir/ ...

how can i move those mails now?

thanks
wolfgang


________________________________________________________________________
Wolfgang Zeikat 
System Administrator - Technology
WSI Webseek Infoservice GmbH & Co. KG - Herrengraben 3 - D-20459 Hamburg
Phone (+49) 40-300 69 322  - Fax (+49) 40-300 69 399
http://www.infoseek.de - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Go to www.qmail.org and look for section "User-Contributed Maildir Support".

On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 05:40:09PM +0200, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
> i started our qmail server by accident with Mailbox delivery enabled,
> now the incoming mails of about 3 hours went into those files ~/Mailbox.
> 
> our regular usage is ~/Maildir/ delivery, and i restarted the server
> with ~/Maildir/ ...
> 
> how can i move those mails now?
> 
> thanks
> wolfgang
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Wolfgang Zeikat       
> System Administrator - Technology
> WSI Webseek Infoservice GmbH & Co. KG - Herrengraben 3 - D-20459 Hamburg
> Phone (+49) 40-300 69 322  - Fax (+49) 40-300 69 399
> http://www.infoseek.de - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Jose Celestino  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Every morning I read the obituaries; if my name's not there,
        I go to work."




Wolfgang Zeikat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i started our qmail server by accident with Mailbox delivery enabled,
> now the incoming mails of about 3 hours went into those files ~/Mailbox.
> 
> our regular usage is ~/Maildir/ delivery, and i restarted the server
> with ~/Maildir/ ...
> 
> how can i move those mails now?

Use an mbox-to-Maildir converter, and script doing the conversion for all
of your users.  I believe there are pointers to various converters on the
www.qmail.org site.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




Does anybody have a script to copy the contents of an MH dir (no
subdirs)  to a maildir?

Thx
-- 
---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis  





I have problem with qmail-queue. I tried queue-fix but no result
any sujestions

Apr  2 20:02:14 ns qmail: 986230934.700737 starting delivery 4: msg 197885
to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr  2 20:02:14 ns qmail: 986230934.700877 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
Apr  2 20:02:15 ns qmail: 986230935.313986 delivery 4: deferral:
Unable_to_forward_message:_qq_trouble_creating_files_in_queue_(#4.3.0)./
Apr  2 20:02:15 ns qmail: 986230935.314138 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20


_______________________________________________________________________________
BATES BULGARIA Ltd.
Project Managers, Designers, Property and Development Consultants

61 Vitosha Blvd. Sofia 100, Bulgaria
_______________________________________________________________________________
WWW.BATES.EU.COM





Milen Petrinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Apr  2 20:02:15 ns qmail: 986230935.313986 delivery 4: deferral:
> Unable_to_forward_message:_qq_trouble_creating_files_in_queue_(#4.3.0)./

One of the following is true:
    -the queue disk is full
    -the queue disk is out of inodes
    -the ownership/permissions of the queue structure are incorrect
    -qmail-queue isn't setuid qmailq

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------





> >
> > Apr  2 20:02:15 ns qmail: 986230935.313986 delivery 4: deferral:
> > Unable_to_forward_message:_qq_trouble_creating_files_in_queue_(#4.3.0)./
>
> One of the following is true:
>     -the queue disk is full
>     -the queue disk is out of inodes
>     -the ownership/permissions of the queue structure are incorrect
>     -qmail-queue isn't setuid qmailq
>
The first two don't match - there is plenty of space, after applying
queue-fix the ownership/permitions of the queue should be OK, so the
possibility is that the qmail-queue permitions are messed. The problem
ocures when installing vpopmail with --enable-roaming-users=yes and trying
to pop-before-smtp.





Hello,

I'm trying to use the command maildirwatch of qmail to read email 
locally on the server and all that I can see is a blank screen with 
nothing. The only possibility to escape from this screen is to use 
Ctrl+c. Does some one have a good explanation to this problem?

-- 
Gerhard Mourani - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operation & Development Manager
OpenNA.com - http://www.openna.com/
--





Gerhard Mourani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I'm trying to use the command maildirwatch of qmail to read email 
> locally on the server and all that I can see is a blank screen with 
> nothing. The only possibility to escape from this screen is to use 
> Ctrl+c. Does some one have a good explanation to this problem?

`man maildirwatch`

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




        I finally got Qmail working well almost anyways :-) I have setup an e-mail
account in Outlook 2000 after everything was tested and created. The account
is authorized with no errors. But mail never seems to come through, and it
never comes back with an error? I just the server and can't seem to find any
new messages in the Maildir. Any suggestions?






* Marcus Ouimet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010402 12:45]:
>       I finally got Qmail working well almost anyways :-) I have setup an e-mail
> account in Outlook 2000 after everything was tested and created. The account
> is authorized with no errors. But mail never seems to come through, and it
> never comes back with an error? I just the server and can't seem to find any
> new messages in the Maildir. Any suggestions?

Please provide more info. How do you start pop3d? Have you tried to telnet
to yourhost:110 and to login manually?

> 
> 
-- 
Kirill




Marcus Ouimet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I finally got Qmail working well almost anyways :-) I have setup an e-mail
> account in Outlook 2000 after everything was tested and created. The account
> is authorized with no errors. But mail never seems to come through, and it
> never comes back with an error? I just the server and can't seem to find any
> new messages in the Maildir. Any suggestions?

1)  Read more documentation.  You're almost certainly dealing with a
non-problem, or one which has been discussed to death in Dan's docs and the
mailing list.
2)  Post useful error reports.  The above tells us nothing.  At the very
least, post all of the following information, _unedited_, with your messages
to the list, until you are certain what is relevant and what is not.  Note:
despite the above, you do not know what is relevant and what is not until
you've successfully resolved a few dozen problems.

    -the output of `qmail-showctl`
    -your complete qmail start scripts, showing how you run qmail-start
    and qmail-smtpd.
    -any and all informational or error messages received
    -what you expected to happen
    -what you observed to happen
    -sections of your qmail logs covering the whole incident you observed
    -precise information on what software is in use:  version of qmail, any
    and all patches applied, other related software in use (vmailmgr,
    vpopmail, relay-ctrl, Courier IMAP, etc)

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




In inetd.conf the following was added:

pop-3   stream  tcp     nowait  root  /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup qmail-popup
mail.videomoviehouse.com /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3
Maildir

Killed inetd with HUP (kill all -HUP inetd)

Maildir created same as user and also made sure the /etc/passwd file was the
same. Checkpassword is working correctly when running. ie:

+OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
user info
+OK
pass testing
+OK

Yes I am in root.

I also restarted qmail ie - qmail restart. Qmail seems to be running fine:

[root@www /]# ps -auxx | grep qmail
root     27540  0.0  0.1  1088  116 ?        S    Mar20   0:00 supervise
qmail-s
root     27542  0.0  0.1  1088  116 ?        S    Mar20   0:00 supervise
qmail-s
qmaill   27545  0.0  0.0  1100   32 ?        S    Mar20   0:00
/usr/local/bin/mu
qmaill   27554  0.0  0.0  1100    0 ?        SW   Mar20   0:00 [multilog]
qmails    4740  0.0  0.6  1140  396 ?        S    12:16   0:00 qmail-send
qmaild    4742  0.0  0.7  1152  472 ?        S    12:16   0:00
/usr/local/bin/tc
root      4752  0.0  0.5  1100  348 ?        S    12:16   0:00 qmail-lspawn
./Ma
qmailr    4753  0.0  0.5  1100  340 ?        S    12:16   0:00 qmail-rspawn
qmailq    4754  0.0  0.5  1092  352 ?        S    12:16   0:00 qmail-clean
root     12532  0.0  0.8  1364  524 pts/2    S    13:34   0:00 grep qmail


Is that enough info to make some sense of this?

Thanks in advance by the way :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Kirill Miazine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 2, 2001 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Never gets delivered?


* Marcus Ouimet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010402 12:45]:
>       I finally got Qmail working well almost anyways :-) I have setup an
e-mail
> account in Outlook 2000 after everything was tested and created. The
account
> is authorized with no errors. But mail never seems to come through, and it
> never comes back with an error? I just the server and can't seem to find
any
> new messages in the Maildir. Any suggestions?

Please provide more info. How do you start pop3d? Have you tried to telnet
to yourhost:110 and to login manually?

>
>
--
Kirill






Charles,

Excellent Reply!!!  THIS is the type of reply I'd like to see
in lieu of "Read Life With Qmail".  Not rude, just informative.

Hey, let's face it.  Alot of the newbies simply don't even know
what they "need to know" before asking a question. (Including Me!)
This type of post educates them as to HOW to get the information
the "experts" need in order to get quality help...

Good work!

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Never gets delivered?


Marcus Ouimet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I finally got Qmail working well almost anyways :-) I have setup an e-mail
> account in Outlook 2000 after everything was tested and created. The
account
> is authorized with no errors. But mail never seems to come through, and it
> never comes back with an error? I just the server and can't seem to find
any
> new messages in the Maildir. Any suggestions?

1)  Read more documentation.  You're almost certainly dealing with a
non-problem, or one which has been discussed to death in Dan's docs and the
mailing list.
2)  Post useful error reports.  The above tells us nothing.  At the very
least, post all of the following information, _unedited_, with your messages
to the list, until you are certain what is relevant and what is not.  Note:
despite the above, you do not know what is relevant and what is not until
you've successfully resolved a few dozen problems.

    -the output of `qmail-showctl`
    -your complete qmail start scripts, showing how you run qmail-start
    and qmail-smtpd.
    -any and all informational or error messages received
    -what you expected to happen
    -what you observed to happen
    -sections of your qmail logs covering the whole incident you observed
    -precise information on what software is in use:  version of qmail, any
    and all patches applied, other related software in use (vmailmgr,
    vpopmail, relay-ctrl, Courier IMAP, etc)

Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------





* Marcus Ouimet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010402 13:40]:
> In inetd.conf the following was added:
> 
> pop-3   stream  tcp     nowait  root  /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup qmail-popup
> mail.videomoviehouse.com /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3
> Maildir
> 
> Killed inetd with HUP (kill all -HUP inetd)
> 
> Maildir created same as user and also made sure the /etc/passwd file was the
> same. Checkpassword is working correctly when running. ie:
> 
> +OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> user info
> +OK
> pass testing
> +OK
> 
> Yes I am in root.
> 
> I also restarted qmail ie - qmail restart. Qmail seems to be running fine:
> 
> [root@www /]# ps -auxx | grep qmail
> root     27540  0.0  0.1  1088  116 ?        S    Mar20   0:00 supervise
> qmail-s
> root     27542  0.0  0.1  1088  116 ?        S    Mar20   0:00 supervise
> qmail-s
> qmaill   27545  0.0  0.0  1100   32 ?        S    Mar20   0:00
> /usr/local/bin/mu
> qmaill   27554  0.0  0.0  1100    0 ?        SW   Mar20   0:00 [multilog]
> qmails    4740  0.0  0.6  1140  396 ?        S    12:16   0:00 qmail-send
> qmaild    4742  0.0  0.7  1152  472 ?        S    12:16   0:00
> /usr/local/bin/tc
> root      4752  0.0  0.5  1100  348 ?        S    12:16   0:00 qmail-lspawn
> ./Ma
> qmailr    4753  0.0  0.5  1100  340 ?        S    12:16   0:00 qmail-rspawn
> qmailq    4754  0.0  0.5  1092  352 ?        S    12:16   0:00 qmail-clean
> root     12532  0.0  0.8  1364  524 pts/2    S    13:34   0:00 grep qmail
> 
> 
> Is that enough info to make some sense of this?

Nice :)
One more thing I'd like to ask: can you show user info's .qmail? And your
qmail startup file (/var/qmail/rc). Are you delivering to ./Maildir/ by
default or is Mailbox youe default delivery?

> 
> Thanks in advance by the way :-)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kirill Miazine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: April 2, 2001 3:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Never gets delivered?
> 
> 
> * Marcus Ouimet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010402 12:45]:
> >     I finally got Qmail working well almost anyways :-) I have setup an
> e-mail
> > account in Outlook 2000 after everything was tested and created. The
> account
> > is authorized with no errors. But mail never seems to come through, and it
> > never comes back with an error? I just the server and can't seem to find
> any
> > new messages in the Maildir. Any suggestions?
> 
> Please provide more info. How do you start pop3d? Have you tried to telnet
> to yourhost:110 and to login manually?
> 
> >
> >
> --
> Kirill
> 
> 
-- 
Kirill




Hi all,

Im trying to install qmail-autoreponder-0.93 but when i run the "make"
command I got the following error:

qmail-autoresponder.c:4: getopt.h: No such file or directory

Somebody help me ?

TIA
Jairo





Hi all:


I had previously asked this question, although in different language. I was
basically told to go and read before posting the questions. Well, I have
re-read djbdns, FAQ and any other information which was suggested by some of
you. I have basically the same question about "dnscache" and "dnscachex";

I have installed "dnscache" to listen on 127.0.0.1 and then "dnscachex" on
63.113.255.3 and to handle DNS inquiries from the 63.113.255 network. I have
followed procedure as outline in djbdns documentation. Now when I look into
following directories:

        /etc/dnscache/root/ip  > 127.0.0.1
        /etc/dnscachex/root/ip > 127.0.0.1     63.113.255

Now my question. From looking at above information, it seems that both
"dnscache" & "dnscachex" are listening on 127.0.0.1 but "dnscachex" is also
listening on 63.113.255. Therefore, why would anybody install "dnscache" and
not just "dnscachex"?


Kirti 




"Kirti S. Bajwa" wrote:

>
>
> I have installed "dnscache" to listen on 127.0.0.1 and then "dnscachex" on
> 63.113.255.3 and to handle DNS inquiries from the 63.113.255 network. I have
> followed procedure as outline in djbdns documentation. Now when I look into
> following directories:
>
>         /etc/dnscache/root/ip  > 127.0.0.1
>         /etc/dnscachex/root/ip > 127.0.0.1     63.113.255

In that "ip" directory, 127.0.0.1 is the IP address of the client that is
allowed to query your dnscache.
You can install dnscache for each IP address of your multi-homed host. You can
install on directories /etc/dnscache, /etc/dnscache2, ..., etc. Names don't
matter. However, if you want one dnscache to listen on all your IP addresses
(of a multi-homed host) including on 127.0.0.1, you can specify an IP address
of 0.0.0.0 when you run dnscache-conf. I'm not saying this is good practice or
not. I just know that that works for me.

>
>
> Now my question. From looking at above information, it seems that both
> "dnscache" & "dnscachex" are listening on 127.0.0.1 but "dnscachex" is also
> listening on 63.113.255. Therefore, why would anybody install "dnscache" and
> not just "dnscachex"?
>
> Kirti





esl:

Thanks for your response. I am still hazy in my head. I understand that
"Names don't matter"... but my question was somewhat different. I hope you
try again to answer it.

Please also note that I am following the djbdns document... and using the
same names as being used in the documentation. In the document "dnscache"
and "dnscachex" are being referred to as "local DNS cache" and "external DNS
cache" respectively. I have installed both "local DNS cache" and "external
DNS cache" on the same machine. I find that the default installation of
"external DNS cache" listens on 127.0.0.1 & 63.113.255 whereas default
installation of "local DNS cache" also listens on 127.0.0.1. 

Therefore, am I to assume that if "external DNS cache" is installed on a
machine, then there is no need to install "local DNS cache" on the SAME
machine (and that it is redundant)?

Kirti




-----Original Message-----
From: esl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 7:08 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: dnscache vs dnscachex


"Kirti S. Bajwa" wrote:

>
>
> I have installed "dnscache" to listen on 127.0.0.1 and then "dnscachex" on
> 63.113.255.3 and to handle DNS inquiries from the 63.113.255 network. I
have
> followed procedure as outline in djbdns documentation. Now when I look
into
> following directories:
>
>         /etc/dnscache/root/ip  > 127.0.0.1
>         /etc/dnscachex/root/ip > 127.0.0.1     63.113.255

In that "ip" directory, 127.0.0.1 is the IP address of the client that is
allowed to query your dnscache.
You can install dnscache for each IP address of your multi-homed host. You
can
install on directories /etc/dnscache, /etc/dnscache2, ..., etc. Names don't
matter. However, if you want one dnscache to listen on all your IP addresses
(of a multi-homed host) including on 127.0.0.1, you can specify an IP
address
of 0.0.0.0 when you run dnscache-conf. I'm not saying this is good practice
or
not. I just know that that works for me.

>
>
> Now my question. From looking at above information, it seems that both
> "dnscache" & "dnscachex" are listening on 127.0.0.1 but "dnscachex" is
also
> listening on 63.113.255. Therefore, why would anybody install "dnscache"
and
> not just "dnscachex"?
>
> Kirti




On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:11:39PM -0400, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
> I have installed both "local DNS cache" and "external DNS cache" on the same
> machine.

You don't need to do that. Just install an external cache, and list the address
of the machine's external interface in /etc/resolv.conf. Both the machine
itself and external clients can use the same cache that way.

> I find that the default installation of "external DNS cache" listens on
> 127.0.0.1 & 63.113.255

No it doesn't. I think you mean that it'll allow connections from 127.0.0.1 and
63.113.255.*. It'll only listen on one address.

> whereas default installation of "local DNS cache" also listens on 127.0.0.1. 

See above.

> Therefore, am I to assume that if "external DNS cache" is installed on a
> machine, then there is no need to install "local DNS cache" on the SAME
> machine (and that it is redundant)?

That's correct. You just need one cache, and it can be used by remote clients
as well as themachine itself.

Chris

PGP signature





Wooooooooooooo.............

Finally an answer. Hey Thanks. Go buy yourself a drink. You deserve it.

Kirti

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:15 PM
To: Kirti S. Bajwa
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: dnscache vs dnscachex


On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:11:39PM -0400, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
> I have installed both "local DNS cache" and "external DNS cache" on the
same
> machine.

You don't need to do that. Just install an external cache, and list the
address
of the machine's external interface in /etc/resolv.conf. Both the machine
itself and external clients can use the same cache that way.

> I find that the default installation of "external DNS cache" listens on
> 127.0.0.1 & 63.113.255

No it doesn't. I think you mean that it'll allow connections from 127.0.0.1
and
63.113.255.*. It'll only listen on one address.

> whereas default installation of "local DNS cache" also listens on
127.0.0.1. 

See above.

> Therefore, am I to assume that if "external DNS cache" is installed on a
> machine, then there is no need to install "local DNS cache" on the SAME
> machine (and that it is redundant)?

That's correct. You just need one cache, and it can be used by remote
clients
as well as themachine itself.

Chris




Timothy:

You make some interesting point... Let me clarify something. This is my
class project, so time is short. in this case I have to follow some strict
rules. In my setup, Linux server ns1.mydomain.com is using IP address of
63.113.255.3. On the same machine, I have a third party dial in bank using
IP 63.113.255.x. My setup should allow external CACHE to dial-in users (test
users).  Based on that, I will be installing only external Cache listening
on 63.113.255.3. You can answer the following, from your answers:

>> If you only need DNS resolution services (lookups and caching) for one
machine, a local cache is what you want. On the other hand, if you want
to provide DNS service for more than one machine, you need an external
cache - dnscache running on a real IP address.<<

Reviewing the above statement, my only choice is to install external cache
so dial in clients can be serviced.


>> The problem with your setup is that your IP address, 63.113.255.3, is a
public address. If you connect to the Internet, the whole world can see
it and the whole world can then use your DNS cache. You don't want that.<<

I sure do not want the world to see... But if the only IP's 127.0.0.1 &
63.113.255.* are allowed to connect, then it should make no difference?



>> Can you set up your network to use an address like 192.168.xxx.xxx?
Those are addresses that are not public IP addresses. You can assign
more than one address to a network interface using ifconfig. The
additional addresses are called aliases.

The idea is that your whole network uses addresses in the
192.168.xxx.xxx range and you use NAT (Network Address Translation)
to convert from public addresses (like 64.113.255.3) to 192.168.x.x
addresses. <<

Well in this case, we already wrote a paper which outlined the class
project. Can't change it now.

Thanks.


Kirti






-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Legant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:19 PM
To: Kirti S. Bajwa
Subject: Re: dnscache vs dnscachex


On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:11:39PM -0400, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
> Please also note that I am following the djbdns document... and using the
> same names as being used in the documentation. In the document "dnscache"
> and "dnscachex" are being referred to as "local DNS cache" and "external
DNS
> cache" respectively. I have installed both "local DNS cache" and "external
> DNS cache" on the same machine.

Generally, you only need a local cache OR an external cache. Not both.
You *definitely* would never install both on the same machine.

>                                 I find that the default installation of
> "external DNS cache" listens on 127.0.0.1 & 63.113.255 whereas default
> installation of "local DNS cache" also listens on 127.0.0.1. 

As the previous guy said, the files in the "ip" directory are *not* the
addresses that dnscache is listening on. They are the addresses that
dnscache will accept queries from. To see what addresses dnscache is
listening on, look at the contents of the file .../dnscache/env/IP .
You can also use "netstat -a".

> Therefore, am I to assume that if "external DNS cache" is installed on a
> machine, then there is no need to install "local DNS cache" on the SAME
> machine (and that it is redundant)?

The only difference between a local cache and an external cache is that
the external cache is listening on an IP address that other computers
can see. In other words, 63.113.255.3. A local cache listens to
127.0.0.1 and therefore can provide caching services *only* to the local
machine.

If you only need DNS resolution services (lookups and caching) for one
machine, a local cache is what you want. On the other hand, if you want
to provide DNS service for more than one machine, you need an external
cache - dnscache running on a real IP address.

The problem with your setup is that your IP address, 63.113.255.3, is a
public address. If you connect to the Internet, the whole world can see
it and the whole world can then use your DNS cache. You don't want that.

Can you set up your network to use an address like 192.168.xxx.xxx?
Those are addresses that are not public IP addresses. You can assign
more than one address to a network interface using ifconfig. The
additional addresses are called aliases.

The idea is that your whole network uses addresses in the
192.168.xxx.xxx range and you use NAT (Network Address Translation)
to convert from public addresses (like 64.113.255.3) to 192.168.x.x
addresses.

If you want to keep it simple (I seem to remember this is for a class
project?) Then just put the external cache on 63.113.255.3 and put

nameserver 63.113.255.3

in the /etc/resolv.conf file on all of your Un*x machines and tell the
Windows machines that 63.113.255.3 is their nameserver. Things will work
fine then, although probably lots of other people will start using your
nameserver, too.

Tim




hi

i don't know perhaps i would better ask in a vpopmail-list but i think i'm
right here also so i'll ask... and please don't flame me ;-)

i've patched qmail with the smtp-auth patch of
 http://members.elysium.pl/brush/smtp-auth/
and everything works fine (also with vpopmail) as long as i use
plain-login. now i would be happy if i could use cram-md5 authentication,
but i haven't found a way to do this (with vpopmail) ? anybody who has got
a solution for that, i would be veeeery happy! thank ya

greets
 Martin
-- 
http://www.kos.li/     [EMAIL PROTECTED]      +41-76-384-93-33
   ICQ# 13556143
                          Say NO to HTML in mail and news
  Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux. See http://www.debian.org/







>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >     I have a problem . I have to block an user say [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
> sending
> > mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . How can i acheive this in qmail.
> >
> > The mail server on mydomain.com is a qmail mail server. I tried doing
this
> > using the control file badrecipient in /var/qmail/control directory. But
> > that doesn't work out.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> > Mathew
> >





* Mathew Chandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010403 10:41]:
> > > I have a problem . I have to block an user say [EMAIL PROTECTED] from sending
> > > mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . How can i acheive this in qmail.
> > >
> > > The mail server on mydomain.com is a qmail mail server. I tried doing
> > > this using the control file badrecipient in /var/qmail/control
> > > directory. But that doesn't work out.

Standard qmail does not have a badrecipient file. However, there is a
badmailfrom file. So echo "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
should do the trick. Then, [EMAIL PROTECTED] can't send mail to anyone on your
host.

control/badrcptto is possible with patches from www.qmail.org. Putting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in that file will stop all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you only want to stop [EMAIL PROTECTED] from sending mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], you'll need to put things in that users' qmail file.

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

PGP signature





Hello,

        I'm trying to understand how does the splooger work. I'm using
qmail-1.03, ucspi-tcp, daemontools and supervise-scripts.
There are run script in /var/qmail/service/<service> and
/var/qmail/service/<service>/log.
The run script in the log dirs starts 'splogger' with the name of
service.
But how does the splogger know what to log? As I looked to its sources
it reads stdin and passes it to the syslog. Who redirects the output
from the daemon (e.g. pop3, smtp, ...) to the appropriate splogger?
I want to know it as I use Courier-IMAP and I want to use it with
tcpserver (instead of its own couriertcp), and I want to have some log
from IMAP server.
Can someone describe the qmail logging internals? I hove found nothing
on the web and in the docs and reading sources didn't engligten me.

Regards,
Martin




Am 3 Apr 2001, um 11:14 hat Martin Edlman geschrieben:
> it reads stdin and passes it to the syslog. Who redirects the output
> from the daemon (e.g. pop3, smtp, ...) to the appropriate splogger?

You have to do it yourself. Qmail itself creates a pipe to it's 
logging program.

The simplest way to get all this going is to use the daemontools 
package and to start all the services from there.

If you are interested, I can send you my run scripts for the 
daemontools setup.

The daemontools package contains also the multilog program that does 
more reliable logging than splogger (because it avoids syslog).

Regards, Frank




Am 3 Apr 2001, um 11:14 hat Martin Edlman geschrieben:

> I want to know it as I use Courier-IMAP and I want to use it with
> tcpserver (instead of its own couriertcp), and I want to have some log
> from IMAP server.

Sorry, I missed the real question: I don't know how Courier-Imap 
works, but if it logs something to STDERR or STDOUT you may catch it 
then the same way like with the Qmail daemons. Daemontools are 
recommended then too :)

Regards, Frank


Reply via email to