qmail Digest 6 Apr 2001 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 1326
Topics (messages 60329 through 60380):
different folder visible from Messenger&Sqwebmail.
60329 by: Massimo Quintini
60330 by: Kieran Barnes
60335 by: Tim Hunter
long connection times
60331 by: Kieran Barnes
60332 by: Henning Brauer
60336 by: Kieran Barnes
60346 by: Iñigo Martínez Lasala
Re: Mail Parsing
60333 by: Adrian Ho
Re: problems with tcpserver
60334 by: Tim Hunter
60353 by: de5-dated-f3e8eb3bfdd8ebaf.sws5.ctd.ornl.gov
delay before checking mail with outlook
60337 by: Christian Dressend
60340 by: Charles Cazabon
60341 by: Chris Johnson
60342 by: Henning Brauer
60343 by: Christian Dressend
60348 by: Charles Cazabon
60354 by: Aaron L. Meehan
Re: ticketing system?
60338 by: Chris Shenton
Authenticating with vpopmail
60339 by: Andrew Wafula
unknown record type in ...
60344 by: Smith, Lisa
60347 by: Chris Johnson
60350 by: Smith, Lisa
60355 by: Charles Cazabon
60357 by: de5-dated-f3e8eb3bfdd8ebaf.sws5.ctd.ornl.gov
extra Running Qmail book
60345 by: Carl Jeptha
Re: Some hints please
60349 by: de5-dated-f3e8eb3bfdd8ebaf.sws5.ctd.ornl.gov
60367 by: Marco Calistri
60368 by: Marco Calistri
60372 by: Charles Cazabon
60374 by: Adrian Ho
Re: Estimating needed Inodes
60351 by: de5-dated-f3e8eb3bfdd8ebaf.sws5.ctd.ornl.gov
60376 by: Al Sparks
Re: A strange behavior.
60352 by: de5-dated-f3e8eb3bfdd8ebaf.sws5.ctd.ornl.gov
60375 by: Kou Sato
simple question
60356 by: Jan Stifter
60359 by: Charles Cazabon
conf-spawn
60358 by: Federico Edelman Anaya
EHLO a vulnerability?
60360 by: Miller, Dustin
60361 by: Charles Cazabon
60362 by: Miller, Dustin
Re: IMAP Server Problem
60363 by: Nick (Keith) Fish
Re: qmail-autoreponder-0.93
60364 by: Nick (Keith) Fish
dual processors? over 500 connections?
60365 by: Brett
60366 by: Charles Cazabon
Error 550 message rejected
60369 by: Matt Simonsen
60370 by: Markus Stumpf
smtpd not accepting some messages
60371 by: David Young
60373 by: Charles Cazabon
Very slow qmail response
60377 by: Tom Jackson
60378 by: Peter Cavender
re-writing headers based on rules
60379 by: Eric Bonharme
60380 by: Frank Tegtmeyer
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a qmail server with server wu-imap (for Maildir) and sqwebmail for mail access via web. my users use the following MUAs: NetscapeMessenger(with imap protocol) Netscape Navigator with sqwebmail If I create a PERSONAL FOLDER with Sqwebmail, i cannot see that folder with Messenger and vice versa; (in fact any MUA creates your own folders at different locations/directory on the server ) Now, the questions!!!: 1) Is there the way to see the SAME folders with the 2 MUAs ??? 2) Is there another sw for webmail "compatible" with imap-folder-location ??? Thanks Excuse me for my bad English!!!! -- ========================================================================== MASSIMO QUINTINI - Osservatorio Astronomico Collurania Teramo (O.A.C.T.) = Via Mentore Maggini s.n.c. - 64100 TERAMO (Italy) = Tel:39-0861.210490 Fax:39-0861.210492 http://www.te.astro.it = ==========================================================================
sqwebmail doesnt need an imap server, it reads the mail from the maildirs. If you want webmail software that uses imap, try squirrelmail www.squirrelmail.org, or IMP www.horde.org/imp (i think IMP reads from IMAP - not sure) Either of those might fix your compatability issues. Probably didnt answer all your questions, but I hope it helps Regards, Kieran Barnes Signum 1226 Ltd Use our Web site at... http://www.1226.net Phone us on... 01772 622889 Fax us on... 01772 622558 -----Original Message----- From: Massimo Quintini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 April 2001 15:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: different folder visible from Messenger&Sqwebmail. I have a qmail server with server wu-imap (for Maildir) and sqwebmail for mail access via web. my users use the following MUAs: NetscapeMessenger(with imap protocol) Netscape Navigator with sqwebmail If I create a PERSONAL FOLDER with Sqwebmail, i cannot see that folder with Messenger and vice versa; (in fact any MUA creates your own folders at different locations/directory on the server ) Now, the questions!!!: 1) Is there the way to see the SAME folders with the 2 MUAs ??? 2) Is there another sw for webmail "compatible" with imap-folder-location ??? Thanks Excuse me for my bad English!!!! -- ========================================================================== MASSIMO QUINTINI - Osservatorio Astronomico Collurania Teramo (O.A.C.T.) = Via Mentore Maggini s.n.c. - 64100 TERAMO (Italy) = Tel:39-0861.210490 Fax:39-0861.210492 http://www.te.astro.it = ==========================================================================
wu-imap does not use the same structure as sqwebmail does for folders. If you want to maintain compatability use the courier-imap package from inter7. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Massimo Quintini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 10:03 AM Subject: different folder visible from Messenger&Sqwebmail. > I have a qmail server with server wu-imap (for Maildir) and sqwebmail > for mail access via web. > > my users use the following MUAs: > > NetscapeMessenger(with imap protocol) > Netscape Navigator with sqwebmail > > If I create a PERSONAL FOLDER with Sqwebmail, i cannot see that folder > with Messenger and vice versa; > (in fact any MUA creates your own folders at different > locations/directory on the server ) > > Now, the questions!!!: > > 1) Is there the way to see the SAME folders with the 2 MUAs ??? > 2) Is there another sw for webmail "compatible" with > imap-folder-location ??? > > Thanks > > Excuse me for my bad English!!!! > > -- > ========================================================================== > MASSIMO QUINTINI - Osservatorio Astronomico Collurania Teramo (O.A.C.T.) = > Via Mentore Maggini s.n.c. - 64100 TERAMO (Italy) = > Tel:39-0861.210490 Fax:39-0861.210492 http://www.te.astro.it = > ========================================================================== > > > >
Hi, I have a clean install of qmail - as per LWQ But when I try to connect to the server it takes at least 20 seconds to get a 220. See below I am connecting to the SMTP server locally, its running on Redhat 6.2, kernel 2.4.2 There is no DNS server at the moment - could this be an issue? [root@xenon /root]# telnet xenon 25 Trying 192.168.34.10... Connected to xenon.i9000networks.com. Escape character is '^]'. <insert 20 seconds here> 220 xenon.i9000networks.com ESMTP I only changed one thing from the LWQ install, and that was to run svscan (from my inittab) on /var/qmail/supervise, but i since changed it back to as per LWQ - same story. Everything seems to be running fine... root 538 0.0 0.5 1124 344 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 svscan root 539 0.0 0.5 1088 320 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 supervise qmail-send root 540 0.0 0.5 1088 320 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 supervise log root 541 0.0 0.5 1088 320 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd root 542 0.0 0.5 1088 320 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 supervise log qmails 543 0.0 0.6 1140 392 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 qmail-send qmaill 548 0.0 0.5 1100 316 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail qmaill 554 0.0 0.5 1100 316 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail/smtpd root 555 0.0 0.5 1100 336 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 qmail-lspawn ./Maildir/ qmailr 556 0.0 0.5 1100 336 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 qmail-rspawn qmailq 557 0.0 0.5 1092 344 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 qmail-clean qmaild 576 0.0 0.7 1152 468 pts/2 S Apr03 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 20 -u 505 -g 5 /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current shows nothing untoward. Any ideas anyone? Regards, Kieran Barnes Signum 1226 Ltd Use our Web site at... http://www.1226.net Phone us on... 01772 622889 Fax us on... 01772 622558
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:35:44AM +0100, Kieran Barnes wrote: > Hi, > > I have a clean install of qmail - as per LWQ > But when I try to connect to the server it takes at least 20 seconds to get > a 220. See below This is not only a FAQ, it is _the_ qmail FAQ. man tcpserver, search for ident and dns lookups. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany
Thankyou, managed to get it working with the -l -R -H flags. I probably dont need them all, but its fine for the time being! /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -l -p -R -H -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \ -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 Regards, Kieran Barnes Signum 1226 Ltd Use our Web site at... http://www.1226.net Phone us on... 01772 622889 Fax us on... 01772 622558 -----Original Message----- From: Henning Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 April 2001 12:29 To: qmail Mailing List (E-mail) Subject: Re: long connection times On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:35:44AM +0100, Kieran Barnes wrote: > Hi, > > I have a clean install of qmail - as per LWQ > But when I try to connect to the server it takes at least 20 seconds to get > a 220. See below This is not only a FAQ, it is _the_ qmail FAQ. man tcpserver, search for ident and dns lookups. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany
I solved this changing tcpserver options. Add -R (tcpserver -v -p -h -R -x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > -----Original Message----- > From: Kieran Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: jueves, 05 de abril de 2001 12:36 > To: qmail Mailing List (E-mail) > Subject: long connection times > > > Hi, > > I have a clean install of qmail - as per LWQ > But when I try to connect to the server it takes at least 20 > seconds to get > a 220. See below > > I am connecting to the SMTP server locally, its running on Redhat 6.2, > kernel 2.4.2 > > There is no DNS server at the moment - could this be an issue? > > [root@xenon /root]# telnet xenon 25 > Trying 192.168.34.10... > Connected to xenon.i9000networks.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > > <insert 20 seconds here> > > This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission. If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it and kindly notify the sender by reply email. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Newknow shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Csaba Bobak wrote: > > Our good buddy DJB has been there and done that. Take a look at: > > http://cr.yp.tp/mess822.html > > Sorry for a bit OT question but how to use it? Looks like you haven't even tried it, so the only applicable advice is: Download <http://cr.yp.to/software/mess822-0.58.tar.gz>, unpack tarball, read README, read INSTALL, install, read man pages, play around. -- Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have nver had a problem with Mandrake, from 6.1 through the 8.0 beta releases, its something else. Sounds like configuration problems. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Dressend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "todd kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:33 AM Subject: RE: problems with tcpserver > Hi! > > > I am also having troble with tcpserver under Mandrake 7.1, but with kernel > 2.4.2. > The mail system works perfectly on the machine, but the system has > significant latencies when I'm trying to establsh an SMTP commection with > qmail-pop3d. I have to try serveral times until the connection is made. I am > getting a timeout error. The PC's are in a local LAN. > > I've had kernel 2.2.15 with the same problem on another installation of > Mandrake. > > Thanks > > -----Original Message----- > From: todd kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 5 aprilie 2001 08:18 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: problems with tcpserver > > > hi. > > i'm trying to get tcpserver installed and running qmail on my machine (linux > with a 2.2.18 kernel. madrake 7.1 to be exact). > > I have qmail installed and running (wondeful program might i ad) and I have > compiled and installed the tcpserver package, but I cannot, for the life of > me, get tcpserver to run qmail for me. > > when i try and issue the tcpserver command from the qmail faq it just runs > for a second and then quits saying it's finished, but there's no instance of > qmail running to deliever mail. > > any help would be greatly appreciated. > > thanks. > > todd > >
"todd kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >when i try and issue the tcpserver command from the qmail faq it just runs >for a second and then quits saying it's finished, but there's no instance of >qmail running to deliever mail. Show us the command you're using. Show us the message that says it's finished. Try running the tcpserver command under trace/truss/strace/par. -Dave
Hi!Does anyone know why there is a long delay before Outlook checks and/or send mail through qmail? The logging service reports the commenction on the server but then occurs a timeout (after a minute)Sometimes this delay does not appear.On the server all is working fine (with pine or through sqwebmail, which I installed)qmail-smtp, pop3 and the rc file are running supervised..Thanks,Christian
Christian Dressend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know why there is a long delay before Outlook checks and/or send > mail through qmail? Yes, many of us do. In fact, one member of the list answered this very question earlier today. Perhaps you should try reading the documentation, the FAQ (it's the number-one most commonly asked question about qmail), and the mailing list archives. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:59:38PM +0300, Christian Dressend wrote: > Does anyone know why there is a long delay before Outlook checks and/or send > mail through qmail? Yes, everyone who's been reading this list for more than a day knows the answer to this question, because it is by *far* the most frequently asked question. Check the list archives (you won't have to look far). Chris
PGP signature
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:59:38PM +0300, Christian Dressend wrote: > Hi! > > Does anyone know why there is a long delay before Outlook checks and/or send I'm tired of answering "man tcpserver". Can't one use the archives? -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany
I did start reading this mailing list only today, i did not receive the earlier answers, but someone send me a real answer and it worked... How can I redirect the tcpserver outputs to /var/syslog? It appears on the first console at the moment. Thank you anyway Christian -----Original Message----- From: Chris Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 5 aprilie 2001 17:42 To: Christian Dressend Cc: Qmail Subject: Re: delay before checking mail with outlook On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:59:38PM +0300, Christian Dressend wrote: > Does anyone know why there is a long delay before Outlook checks and/or send > mail through qmail? Yes, everyone who's been reading this list for more than a day knows the answer to this question, because it is by *far* the most frequently asked question. Check the list archives (you won't have to look far). Chris
Christian Dressend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did start reading this mailing list only today, i did not receive the > earlier answers, but someone send me a real answer and it worked... Netiquette suggests that you "lurk" on a mailing list for a while before posting. That way, you see all the common questions and answers before posting them, and you get pointers to common documents or websites you should read. > How can I redirect the tcpserver outputs to /var/syslog? It appears on the > first console at the moment. Again, a FAQ. The documentation for qmail explains how to send output to syslog. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Christian Dressend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone know why there is a long delay before Outlook checks and/or send > > mail through qmail? Yes, the delay is provided by Microsoft so that you have a bit more time to ponder whether you *really* want to risk automatically executing "certain MIME types." Aaron
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 23:02:32 +0200, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Henning> Jay Jarvinen and I started working on an own ticketing Henning> system, it will appear on sourceforge soon. I'll post a small Henning> note when we have a useable version up if others are Henning> interested. It would be a big win if it were integrated with a source code control system like RCS, CVS, or Perforce. In my work I'm using Perforce and Keystone, and I'm really tired of having to enter the same info both places ("fixed bug #### with patch blash to file foo.c"). It would be cool if the integration allowed me to pop to a ticket, open broken files, fix 'em, check them in, and the ticket system would automagically update its info like bug status and files affected. Perforce has sponsored work to integrate their souce code control system with TeamTrack and Bugzilla. They have an API for integrating other bug-tracking systems. Might be worth looking at. http://www.perforce.com/perforce/products/p4dti.html
Hello, I have a proble with authentication with vpopmail. I use user%domain.com for the username field and the password for the password field in authenticating for virtual domains but I don't have any success. I have qmail running with system accounts and one virtual domain which is set up as per instructions. Please help. Andrew
My apologies if this has already been asked and answered, I've searched the archives and haven't seen anything on it, I've looked thru the docs that I have, and the only thing I have found is "a serious bug in qmail-send or qmail-queue". Does anyone know how to determine what the problem is, and how to fix it? Thanks in advance for your help. Lisa This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:16:53AM -0400, Smith, Lisa wrote: > My apologies if this has already been asked and answered, As far as I can tell from your message, the question still hasn't been asked. > I've searched the archives and haven't seen anything on it It? > I've looked thru the docs that I have, and the only thing I have found is "a > serious bug in qmail-send or qmail-queue". > > Does anyone know how to determine what the problem is, and how to fix it? What problem? Chris
> > My apologies if this has already been asked and answered, > As far as I can tell from your message, the question still hasn't been asked. > > I've searched the archives and haven't seen anything on it > It? (see subject line) "unknown record type in..." errors. > > I've looked thru the docs that I have, and the only thing I have found is "a > > serious bug in qmail-send or qmail-queue". > > > > Does anyone know how to determine what the problem is, and how to fix it? > > What problem? > (see subject line) "unknown record type in ... " errors that show up in the qmail logs: Page 339 of the book "Running Qmail" has only this to say in regard to this error "a serious bug in qmail-send or qmail-queue", which appears to be taken straight from one of the man pages. Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything on how to identify what this bug is, or how to fix it. /var/log/qmail/@blahblahblah: 986483205.027345 warning: unknown record type in todo/365/640582 986483205.027363 warning: unknown record type in todo/431/643642 986483205.027371 warning: unknown record type in todo/432/643643 986483205.027379 warning: unknown record type in todo/436/640653 986483205.027392 warning: unknown record type in todo/438/640655 986483205.027403 warning: unknown record type in todo/438/643649 My apologies if my message was unclear, I was trying to keep it (my message) concise. I would be more than happy to RTFM, or read a FAQ, if someone would kindly and gently point the way to any FAQ's that go into a little more detail about this error. Thanks in advance for your help, Lisa This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you
Smith, Lisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It? > > (see subject line) It's considered good form to actually include all information in the body of your message; don't rely on the subject (or other) headers. > "unknown record type in..." errors. To help you, we need the following information: -version of qmail -any and all patches applied, and other qmail-related software in use -what OS and version you have -how you installed (compile from source, etc) -type and version of your compiler Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Smith, Lisa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >986483205.027345 warning: unknown record type in todo/365/640582 >986483205.027363 warning: unknown record type in todo/431/643642 >986483205.027371 warning: unknown record type in todo/432/643643 >986483205.027379 warning: unknown record type in todo/436/640653 >986483205.027392 warning: unknown record type in todo/438/640655 >986483205.027403 warning: unknown record type in todo/438/643649 How about some history. When did you install? How did you install? Any patches? Any add-ons? Platform? Anything unusual in the set-up: weird h/w, s/w, n/w? Next time, try searching the list archives, e.g. via: http://www-archive.ornl.gov:8000 They aren't too helpful in this case, though. This error has only been reported once and seems to have been due to a botched virus scanner installation. -Dave
Hi, If this is not the right place for this I apologise. Due to a misunderstanding with my local bookstore I have an extra copy of the book Running Qmail that I would like be rid of. I paid $52.00CDN for it. Any offers???? I am in Ontario, Canada. You have a good day now Carl A Jeptha
Marco Calistri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >1) May I remove now all my rcpthosts names except my hostname? Yes. >2) Shall I use supervise with tcpserver? That's a good idea. It makes it easier to control the tcpserver process, and will restart it if it dies (or is killed). >I also installed djbdns aiming to use it for DNSCACHE and to enhance my small >LAN,but I guess it is not working since a "dnsqr a" to my host failed: > >[ik5bcu@linux bin]$ dnsqr a linux.ik5bcu.ampr.org >1 linux.ik5bcu.ampr.org: >timed out > >while a query to localhost works ok: > >[ik5bcu@linux bin]$ dnsqr a localhost >1 localhost: >43 bytes, 1+1+0+0 records, response, noerror >query: 1 localhost >answer: localhost 655360 A 127.0.0.1 You have to tell dnscache which hosts to talk to. For an internal cache, 127.0.0.1 is sufficient--just point to it via /etc/resolv.conf. >Beside this do you think I made a good choice (attempting)to install a dns >considering that: > >1) I have not any BIND on my system >2) I have only private hostnames and IPs >3) My INTERNET connection uses a dynamic IP supplied by my ISP Yes, a dnscache is a good idea. -Dave
On 05-Apr-2001 Charles Cazabon wrote: > Marco Calistri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello,I passed to tcpserver and all seems to work correctly: now I have >> /etc/tcp.smpt file with :allow rules, but I'd have some doubts to resolve: >> >> 1) May I remove now all my rcpthosts names except my hostname? > > Yes; more precisely, remove all hosts for which your server does not handle > mail. For example, you may want to send mail to hotmail.com; this does NOT > mean that hotmail.com should be in rcpthosts. Only _your_ domains should be > in it (with a few exceptions you don't need to worry about). > >> 2) Shall I use supervise with tcpserver? > > If you want. > > Charles > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ > Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks Charles you are very clear,I appreciated. Marco.
On 05-Apr-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Marco Calistri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>1) May I remove now all my rcpthosts names except my hostname? > > Yes. Fine! >>2) Shall I use supervise with tcpserver? > > That's a good idea. It makes it easier to control the tcpserver > process, and will restart it if it dies (or is killed). I'll try! >>I also installed djbdns aiming to use it for DNSCACHE and to enhance my small >>LAN,but I guess it is not working since a "dnsqr a" to my host failed: >> >>[ik5bcu@linux bin]$ dnsqr a linux.ik5bcu.ampr.org >>1 linux.ik5bcu.ampr.org: >>timed out >> >>while a query to localhost works ok: >> >>[ik5bcu@linux bin]$ dnsqr a localhost >>1 localhost: >>43 bytes, 1+1+0+0 records, response, noerror >>query: 1 localhost >>answer: localhost 655360 A 127.0.0.1 > > You have to tell dnscache which hosts to talk to. For an internal > cache, 127.0.0.1 is sufficient--just point to it via /etc/resolv.conf. Hi Dave,Thank you very much,about dns I put the 127.0.0.1 as 3rd nameserver into my /etc/resolv.conf,the previous 2 are the ISP's nameservers. I was aiming to avoid some of the "unknown" messages from my mail's headers Anyway it sounds strange (to me) that my localdns can't find my hostname!! >>Beside this do you think I made a good choice (attempting)to install a dns >>considering that: >> >>1) I have not any BIND on my system >>2) I have only private hostnames and IPs >>3) My INTERNET connection uses a dynamic IP supplied by my ISP > > Yes, a dnscache is a good idea. Oh,Good!...BTW now Fetchmail[OT] is reporting this message: X-Fetchmail-Warning: recipient address [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't match any local name How could I solve this? Marco. > -Dave
Marco Calistri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW now Fetchmail[OT] is reporting this message: > > X-Fetchmail-Warning: recipient address [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't match any > local name Mailing list mail will not have your email address in the headers; you should either tell fetchmail to look at the Delivered-To: header (if the MTA on the POP3 server/IMAP server is qmail), or give it some sort of instruction for default deliveries. Or use getmail, my replacement for fetchmail. You can find it at the link in my .sig. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Marco Calistri wrote: > Hi Dave,Thank you very much,about dns I put the 127.0.0.1 as 3rd nameserver > into my /etc/resolv.conf,the previous 2 are the ISP's nameservers. Since most (all?) resolver libraries query resolv.conf's nameserver list in order, your dnscache will _never_ be queried so long as either or both of your ISP's nameservers are reachable and responding. I have never found any reason to list a locally-maintained dnscache anywhere else but #1 in resolv.conf. I'm curious to know if you've found such a reason. > I was aiming to avoid some of the "unknown" messages from my mail's headers > Anyway it sounds strange (to me) that my localdns can't find my hostname!! As noted above, your ISP's nameservers are being queried first. Since (I presume) they don't know about your domain, what you're getting is not surprising at all. -- Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Al Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I realize this is a little off-topic for this list, but there must be >email administrators that have had to deal with this. We’re running >Linux (Red Hat 6.2, kernel 2.2.14) with ext2 file system. How many >inodes would be sufficient for that kind of setup? You should think in terms of the average size of a mail message. That's the number you'll need to provide to mkfs via "-i". If you guess too high, you'll run out of inodes while there's still free space on the filesystem. If you guess too low, you'll run out of space before inodes. I try to err on the side of allocating a few too inodes. BTW, with SGI's xfs file system, which I'm now running under Linux, inodes aren't preallocated, so you don't have to worry about this issue. You also don't have to worry about 8-hour fsck's on a 200 GB RAID 5 or poor performance on a directory with 10000 files. :-) -Dave
Well, though it wasn’t what I expected, I appreciate the answer. By the way, I don’t have "man mkfs.ext2" on my system (again RH 6.2 install) just "man mkfs". I did some web searches for it, and the one I found was very terse and didn’t indicate how to specify inodes. What’s important is that between the 2 answers I got, I at least know I can specify more i-nodes which will do for now. I can get more detailed information later. Thanks again and sorry I offended. === Al p.s. I’ve seen worse posts than mine get treated better on this list. --- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Al Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I realize this is a little off-topic for this list > [...] > > Yup. > > > What’s the largest number of inodes you can configure for on a partition? > > (How do you? man mkfs isn’t very helpful.) > > How is it not helpful? It refers to you to the man page for mke2fs, which > contains exactly the information you're looking for. > > Charles > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ > Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Kou Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry. I found a typo in my previous message; > >>>>>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2001 12:46:05 +0900, > Kou Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >> Hello. I am thinking about using qmail 1.03, instead of sendmail, > >> but still have a problem. It seems so wierd that I cannot solve it > >> by myself. > > >> Suppose that there are 2 SMTP servers for a domain 'my.domain'. > >> One is smtp1.my.domain and the other is smtp2.my.domain. Both > >> servers are confirmed that they accept the messages from other > >> domain(e.g., to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > > >> But when you send a message from smtp1 to [EMAIL PROTECTED], > >> smtp2 tries to send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], > >> then of course it fails. > > smtp2 tries to sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hmm. I bet if we knew the details of the configuration of smtp1 we might be able to answer this. Start with the unedited output of qmail-showctl. Are you doing any fancy to route mail from smtp1 to smtp2? -Dave
>>>>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:43:18 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> >> Suppose that there are 2 SMTP servers for a domain 'my.domain'. >> >> One is smtp1.my.domain and the other is smtp2.my.domain. Both >> >> servers are confirmed that they accept the messages from other >> >> domain(e.g., to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). >> >> >> But when you send a message from smtp1 to [EMAIL PROTECTED], >> >> smtp2 tries to send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], >> then >> of course it fails. >> >> smtp2 tries to sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave> Hmm. I bet if we knew the details of the configuration of smtp1 we Dave> might be able to answer this. Start with the unedited output of Dave> qmail-showctl. Are you doing any fancy to route mail from smtp1 to Dave> smtp2? Thanks for your response. Actually I use sendmail as an MTA on smtp1. And the above problem happens not only when I send messages using MUA, but even when I connect from smtp1 to smtp2's port 25 via telnet and try to send a message by speaking SMTP. smtp1 receives messages from smtp2 to [EMAIL PROTECTED], both via smtp2's MUA & manual SMTP sessions. So it seems for me that the problem is in the configuration of qmail on smtp2. Should I send the output of qmail-showctl on smtp2? - Koh Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello, my qmail box receives mail for 2 domains, domain A and domain B. domain A is handled locally with vmailmgr and virtual users it is in the virtualdomains control file). mails for domain B are only relayed to another box (it is in the smtproutes control file as domainB:ip-adr:25). the problem: I would like to forward one users mail joe@domainB to joe@domainA (and only this user). how can i do this, when there is no local user for domainB? many thanks in advance jan
Jan Stifter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > domain A is handled locally with vmailmgr and virtual users it is in the > virtualdomains control file). > > mails for domain B are only relayed to another box (it is in the smtproutes > control file as domainB:ip-adr:25). So domain B (use real domains next time, it's easier) is only in rcpthosts and smtproutes, not locals or virtualdomains? > the problem: I would like to forward one users mail joe@domainB to > joe@domainA (and only this user). how can i do this, when there is no local > user for domainB? You'll have to make domain B a virtual domain, controlled by a local user (such as alias). Do this with a virtualdomains entry like: domainb.org:alias-domainb Then, have a .qmail file for joe: ~alias/.qmail-domainb-joe which contains a forward directive ("&[EMAIL PROTECTED]") Then handle the remainder of the domain in another .qmail file: ~alias/.qmail-domainb-default which contains something like: |forward "$DEFAULT"@domainb-different.org and possibly an smtproutes entry for domainb-different.org. domainb-different might be a domain literal (IP address), or another name for which domainb's MX will receive their mail. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
I compile the qmail with conf-spawn 509 value ... How can I setup a big value? sample: 1000 ? Thanks
Can't find this in the mailing list archives (perhaps I'm not searching well enough) but is EHLO really a security vulnerability in qmail? ISS reports that EHLO can be used by potential attackers. Personally, I've never really seen that EHLO can be a bad thing on must MTAs, but I'm not sure 'bout qmail. Any takers on this question? Dustin Miller, Contractor EAD/900 - G-18 (630) 252-6749
Miller, Dustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't find this in the mailing list archives (perhaps I'm not searching well > enough) but is EHLO really a security vulnerability in qmail? No. All EHLO tells an attacker is your hostname, plus that you support 8BITMIME and PIPELINING. > ISS reports that EHLO can be used by potential attackers. Who is ISS? I think they're either badly mistaken or spreading FUD. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
ISS is a software package -- Internet Security Scanner, if memory serves. Thanks for the info. -----Original Message----- From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:43 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: EHLO a vulnerability? Miller, Dustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't find this in the mailing list archives (perhaps I'm not searching well > enough) but is EHLO really a security vulnerability in qmail? No. All EHLO tells an attacker is your hostname, plus that you support 8BITMIME and PIPELINING. > ISS reports that EHLO can be used by potential attackers. Who is ISS? I think they're either badly mistaken or spreading FUD. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anselmo Daniel Adams wrote: > > Hi, > > I use imap-4.7 on my server. Sometimes the server gives to me wrong > arrival dates for all messages. Anyone can help me? > > Anselmo Daniel Adams This is usually caused by system times set wrong on computers somewhere along the route of the e-mail. -- Keith Network Engineer Triton Technologies, Inc.
Sean Reifschneider wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 05:52:11PM -0300, Jairo Marciano Silva wrote: > >Im trying to install qmail-autoreponder-0.93 but when i run the "make" > >command I got the following error: > > > >qmail-autoresponder.c:4: getopt.h: No such file or directory > > You need to install the development headers -- on my Redhat/KRUD 7.0 box it > tells me that getopt.h is in the glibc-devel package. > > Sean Did you install the glibc-devel package? You might try just copying it into the directory you are trying to make qmail-autoresponder in. -- Keith Network Engineer Triton Technologies, Inc.
Does qmail recognize or take advantage of a dual processor setup? I'm assuming that with the big concurrencyremote patch, regardless of the number of processors, we're sill relegated to, at most, 500 simultaneous connections. We need to send a lot of messages within a short period of time and are thinking our best bet is to simply add more machines to our strategy to increase the number of simultaneous connections as this seems to be where improvement is needed. As far as I can tell, the speed of the processors is largely irrelevant since 90% of the speed issue comes from how fast the SMTP connections connect and complete and that variable's out of our hands and dependent on the receiving machine's end. It's quite possible I'm making several erroneous assumptions here so feel free to correct as you see fit and I'll be happy to hear the truth. Thanks a lot!
Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does qmail recognize or take advantage of a dual processor setup? If your OS is multi-processor-capable, then it will schedule qmail's multiple processes across the processors. qmail itself is not multithreaded. > I'm assuming that with the big concurrencyremote patch, regardless of the > number of processors, we're sill relegated to, at most, 500 simultaneous > connections. Depends on your system; conf-spawn can be set higher if the FD_SETSIZE of your system is large enough, and you have a high enough file descriptor limit. > We need to send a lot of messages within a short period of time and are > thinking our best bet is to simply add more machines to our strategy to > increase the number of simultaneous connections as this seems to be where > improvement is needed. How many is "a lot"? Some people on this list report sending out most of a 100,000 member mailing list in the first hour or so after injection into the queue. There's a section at www.qmail.org on large-volume servers. It's also a subject which has come up many, many times on the mailing list. Look through the mailing list archives for the results others have had. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>From what I can tell this message was rejected by the lhh.com server, perhaps an email gateway which was not setup correctly? Can anybody help me translate what this means? Is there anything I can do to fix it from my end? My guess is I just need to talk to their IT group (which is not available right now)- thanks, I just need to be sure I am doing everything I can and that when I talk to them I have enough information. Thanks Matt Simonsen -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at email.careercast.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 207.195.180.22 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 Mail relay not allowed at this server Giving up on 207.195.180.22. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: (qmail 21519 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2001 22:49:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO careercast8) (64.47.230.227) by email.careercast.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2001 22:49:54 -0000 From: "MIKE CAVALLO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'David Estrada'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Fleet and CareerCast Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:43:52 -0700 Message-ID: <003d01c0be21$e3ef8fa0$e3e62f40@careercast8> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 In-Reply-To: For some reason your mail service bounced this. Mike Cavallo EVP CareerCast 5963 La Place Court, Suite 309 Carlsbad, CA 92008 760-602-9502 ext. 16 Fax 760-602-9260
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:29:58PM -0700, Matt Simonsen wrote: > From what I can tell this message was rejected by the lhh.com server, > perhaps an email gateway which was not setup correctly? Correct. > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 207.195.180.22 does not like recipient. > Remote host said: 550 Mail relay not allowed at this server > Giving up on 207.195.180.22. $ host -t mx lhh.com lhh.com mail is handled (pri=10) by fc.lhh.com lhh.com mail is handled (pri=10) by mail.lhh.com lhh.com mail is handled (pri=10) by seattle.lhh.com lhh.com mail is handled (pri=20) by seattle2.lhh.com DNS indicates that these four hosts are to be used as mail exchangers for lhh.com fc.lhh.com has address 12.25.48.197 mail.lhh.com has address 12.25.48.197 seattle.lhh.com is a nickname for lhhmail.dedicatednet.com lhhmail.dedicatednet.com has address 207.195.180.22 lhhmail.dedicatednet.com has address 207.195.180.22 seattle2.lhh.com is a nickname for mx.dedicatednet.com mx.dedicatednet.com has address 207.195.180.11 mx.dedicatednet.com has address 207.195.180.11 seattle.lhh.com and seattle2.lhh.com are configured wrong in DNS. MX records may not point to CNAMEs ... thats one (not critical) problem. > 207.195.180.22 does not like recipient. So it looks like none of the prio=10 hosts was available at that time so the message was sent to seattle.lhh.com and this smtp server is misconfigured according to DNS as it is a MX host for lhh.com but does not accept messages for lhh.com. The same holds for seattle2.lhh.com: $ telnet 207.195.180.11 smtp Trying 207.195.180.11... Connected to ns1.dedicatednet.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 ns1.dedicatednet.com NTMail (v4.30.0013/NU7670.00.0cc0ca14) ready for ESMTP transfer HELO sucker 250 ns1.dedicatednet.com sucker MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 250 OK. RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 550 Mail relay not allowed at this server quit 221 Goodbye sucker So, either the DNS for lhh.com is set up wrong in terms of MX records or the mail servers at dedicatednet.com are set up wrong according to DNS. \Maex P.S. At the moment the prio 10 MX hosts work (again) for me. -- SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0 Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 Stress is when you wake up screaming and you realize you haven't fallen asleep yet.
We just put qmail in production use. All our clients are running Outlook, and most work fine. However some are unable to send mail if their SMTP server is set to the INSIDE interface of our mail server. If we change their SMTP server to the outside interface (ie, they go through the firewall) then it's fine. Network does not seem to be the issue - client can ping the inside interface, and can telnet to port 25 and send a message. Seems to be something specific to Outlook. Outlook progress bar goes halfway, hangs for about 30 seconds, and then reports that the remote server terminated the session error 0x88ccc05. I used recordio to capture the SMTP conversation of a failed attempt on the inside interface and a successful message on the outside interface (user is smarsh, see below). However I don't see anything obvious, except maybe the client neglects to send a QUIT on the first attempt? I dunno the piece of junk mail in the middle makes me lose the track. Any advice? @400000003acd13ed296da104 tcpserver: status: 0/20 @400000003acd141138c276d4 tcpserver: status: 1/20 @400000003acd141138c564d4 tcpserver: pid 8239 from 192.168.254.31 @400000003acd141138e00d0c tcpserver: ok 8239 -H:192.168.254.123:25 :192.168.254.31::1194 400000003acd14113ae3d41c 8239 > 220 mail.nettonettech.com ESMTP 400000003acd14113af131fc 8239 < HELO stefmarshpc 400000003acd14113af1ed7c 8239 > 250 mail.nettonettech.com 400000003acd14113b50900c 8239 < MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd14113b515744 8239 > 250 ok 400000003acd14113b752b24 8239 < RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd14113b75e6a4 8239 > 250 ok 400000003acd14113b7f8f4c 8239 < DATA 400000003acd14113b9574c4 8239 > 354 go ahead 400000003acd141200250684 8239 < From: "Stefanie Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd141200250e54 8239 < To: "Stefanie Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd141200251a0c 8239 < Subject: 400000003acd141200251df4 8239 < Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:58:18 -0700 400000003acd1412002529ac 8239 < Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd14120025317c 8239 < MIME-Version: 1.0 @400000003acd14120025394c 8239 < Content-Type: text/pla+ 400000003acd14120025411c 8239 < in; 400000003acd14120025588c 8239 < charset="iso-8859-1" 400000003acd14120025605c 8239 < Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 400000003acd14120025682c 8239 < X-Priority: 3 (Normal) 400000003acd141200256ffc 8239 < X-MSMail-Priority: Normal 400000003acd1412002577cc 8239 < X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) 400000003acd141200257f9c 8239 < Importance: Normal 400000003acd14120025876c 8239 < X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 400000003acd141200259af4 8239 < 400000003acd14120025a2c4 8239 < 400000003acd141200263b1c 8239 < 400000003acd1412002642ec 8239 < Stefanie S. Marsh 400000003acd1412002646d4 8239 < Operations Manager 400000003acd141200264ea4 8239 < Net to Net Technologies 400000003acd141200265674 8239 < Tel: (603) 427-0600 x310 400000003acd141200265e44 8239 < Fax: (603) 422-0610 @400000003acd141200266614 8239 < e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]+ @400000003acd144a18186f24 tcpserver: status: 2/20 @400000003acd144a18199bec tcpserver: pid 8293 from 209.217.41.97 @400000003acd144a28bea03c tcpserver: ok 8293 -H:63.127.199.134:25 top-greetings.com:209.217.41.97::2449 400000003acd144a28c0fdb4 8293 > 220 mail.nettonettech.com ESMTP 400000003acd144a2c7e8e6c 8293 < HELO top-greetings.com 400000003acd144a2c7ff5cc 8293 > 250 mail.nettonettech.com 400000003acd144a302ae8e4 8293 < MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd144a302c542c 8293 > 250 ok 400000003acd144a33d2bf1c 8293 < RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd144a33d3a1ac 8293 > 250 ok 400000003acd144a377e237c 8293 < DATA 400000003acd144a3794b4d4 8293 > 354 go ahead 400000003acd144b003eb0d4 8293 < From: "Top-Greetings.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd144b003ebc8c 8293 < Subject: Funny Rules, Your Resume, Rooster 400000003acd144b003ec45c 8293 < To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 400000003acd144b003ecc2c 8293 < Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 19:58:17 +0000 400000003acd144b003ed7e4 8293 < 400000003acd144b003edbcc 8293 < 400000003acd144b003ee39c 8293 < *** http://Top-Greetings.com newsletter *** 400000003acd144b003eeb6c 8293 < @400000003acd144b003eef54 8293 < **** Subscribe / Unsubscribe inst+ 400000003acd144b003f0e94 8293 < ructions are at the bottom ****** 400000003acd144b003f1664 8293 < 400000003acd144b003f1e34 8293 < Today's Featured FunPages: [...snip some junk mail content...] @400000003acd144b006c8734 8293 < <a+ 400000003acd144b006d275c 8293 < href=" http://top-greetings.com/U.py?C=Zn6CjXwAHkhM3b-UIOj-UA "> Unsubscribe Link </a> 400000003acd144b006d36fc 8293 < 400000003acd144b006d3ae4 8293 < 400000003acd144b06a4a53c 8293 < . 400000003acd144b06c97704 8293 > 250 ok 986518593 qp 8297 400000003acd145808966704 8293 < QUIT @400000003acd1458089a2bdc tcpserver: end 8293 status 0 @400000003acd1458089a6a5c tcpserver: status: 1/20 400000003acd1458089e3aec 8293 > 221 mail.nettonettech.com @400000003acd1458089e46a4 8293 > [EOF] @400000003acd147503b26f1c tcpserver: status: 2/20 @400000003acd147503b57874 tcpserver: pid 8341 from 192.168.254.31 @400000003acd147503bd8ec4 tcpserver: ok 8341 -H:192.168.254.123:25 :192.168.254.31::1196 400000003acd1475040722b4 8341 > 220 mail.nettonettech.com ESMTP 400000003acd14750413c8fc 8341 < HELO stefmarshpc 400000003acd14750414847c 8341 > 250 mail.nettonettech.com 400000003acd147505efdfe4 8341 < MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd147505f0a71c 8341 > 250 ok 400000003acd14750618cc74 8341 < RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd1475061987f4 8341 > 250 ok 400000003acd14750623b954 8341 < DATA 400000003acd14750639cdac 8341 > 354 go ahead 400000003acd14750654049c 8341 < From: "Stefanie Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd147506541054 8341 < To: "Stefanie Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd147506541824 8341 < Subject: 400000003acd147506541ff4 8341 < Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:59:57 -0700 400000003acd1475065427c4 8341 < Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd14750654337c 8341 < MIME-Version: 1.0 @400000003acd147506543b4c 8341 < Content-Type: text/pla+ 400000003acd14750654431c 8341 < in; 400000003acd147506545e74 8341 < charset="iso-8859-1" 400000003acd147506546644 8341 < Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 400000003acd147506546e14 8341 < X-Priority: 3 (Normal) 400000003acd1475065475e4 8341 < X-MSMail-Priority: Normal 400000003acd147506547db4 8341 < X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) 400000003acd147506548584 8341 < Importance: Normal 400000003acd147506548d54 8341 < X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 400000003acd14750654a8ac 8341 < 400000003acd14750654b07c 8341 < 400000003acd147506554cbc 8341 < 400000003acd1475065550a4 8341 < Stefanie S. Marsh 400000003acd147506555874 8341 < Operations Manager 400000003acd147506556044 8341 < Net to Net Technologies 400000003acd147506556814 8341 < Tel: (603) 427-0600 x310 400000003acd147506556fe4 8341 < Fax: (603) 422-0610 @400000003acd1475065573cc 8341 < e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]+ @400000003acd14b01848b684 tcpserver: status: 3/20 @400000003acd14b0184c44ac tcpserver: pid 8395 from 63.127.199.133 @400000003acd14b018ad871c tcpserver: ok 8395 -H:63.127.199.134:25 :63.127.199.133::21102 400000003acd14b018f6fbcc 8395 > 220 mail.nettonettech.com ESMTP 400000003acd14b0190e67e4 8395 < HELO stefmarshpc 400000003acd14b0190f274c 8395 > 250 mail.nettonettech.com 400000003acd14b0196fa284 8395 < MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd14b019706da4 8395 > 250 ok 400000003acd14b019949f44 8395 < RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd14b019957234 8395 > 250 ok 400000003acd14b019a70e04 8395 < DATA 400000003acd14b019b45474 8395 > 354 go ahead 400000003acd14b019f04c04 8395 < From: "Stefanie Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd14b019f05ba4 8395 < To: "Stefanie Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd14b019f0675c 8395 < Subject: 400000003acd14b019f06f2c 8395 < Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:00:57 -0700 400000003acd14b019f076fc 8395 < Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 400000003acd14b019f082b4 8395 < MIME-Version: 1.0 @400000003acd14b019f08a84 8395 < Content-Type: text/pla+ 400000003acd14b019f08e6c 8395 < in; 400000003acd14b019f0dc8c 8395 < charset="iso-8859-1" 400000003acd14b019f0e45c 8395 < Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 400000003acd14b019f0ec2c 8395 < X-Priority: 3 (Normal) 400000003acd14b019f0f3fc 8395 < X-MSMail-Priority: Normal 400000003acd14b019f0fbcc 8395 < X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) 400000003acd14b019f1039c 8395 < Importance: Normal 400000003acd14b019f10b6c 8395 < X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 400000003acd14b019f11ef4 8395 < 400000003acd14b019f126c4 8395 < 400000003acd14b019f1c304 8395 < 400000003acd14b019f1cad4 8395 < Stefanie S. Marsh 400000003acd14b019f1d2a4 8395 < Operations Manager 400000003acd14b019f1da74 8395 < Net to Net Technologies 400000003acd14b019f1e244 8395 < Tel: (603) 427-0600 x310 400000003acd14b019f1e62c 8395 < Fax: (603) 422-0610 @400000003acd14b019f1edfc 8395 < e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]+ 400000003acd14b01a57956c 8395 < 400000003acd14b01a579d3c 8395 < . 400000003acd14b01a7c3c3c 8395 > 250 ok 986518694 qp 8397 400000003acd14b01ced4024 8395 < QUIT @400000003acd14b01cf14b4c tcpserver: end 8395 status 0 @400000003acd14b01cf185e4 tcpserver: status: 2/20 400000003acd14b01cf6ae34 8395 > 221 mail.nettonettech.com @400000003acd14b01cf6b9ec 8395 > [EOF] @400000003acd14d52afd747c tcpserver: status: 0/20
David Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: re: Outlook hanging > I used recordio to capture the SMTP conversation of a failed attempt on the > inside interface and a successful message on the outside interface (user is > smarsh, see below). However I don't see anything obvious, except maybe the > client neglects to send a QUIT on the first attempt? I dunno the piece of > junk mail in the middle makes me lose the track. > > Any advice? Throw Outlook away? This is apparently a known bug in Outlook; it's been brought up before on this list (check the archives). I'm not sure if there are fixes/upgrades for all of its bugs. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
My qmail has been running fine for a year or more. Now it is very slow to accept connections on SMTP or POP3 ports. I get this behavior from other computers on the local network, but everything works as usual from the qmail server. I've tried it with telnet, Netscape and other software with the same results. What can/should I check? Thanks, --Tom Jackson
Have there been any changes on the DNS setup for your system; i.e., your nameservers. In my experience this has been the #1 cause of delays, because email/qmail depends heavliy on DNS service. I have several nameserver changeovers, and when things are not exactly kosher, qmail grinds to a crawl. Secondly, look at the que and see what is there. my $0.02 --Pete On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Tom Jackson wrote: > My qmail has been running fine for a year or more. Now it is very slow > to accept connections on SMTP or POP3 ports. > > I get this behavior from other computers on the local network, but > everything works as usual from the qmail server. > > I've tried it with telnet, Netscape and other software with the same > results. > > What can/should I check? > > Thanks, > > --Tom Jackson >
Title: re-writing headers based on rulesHi there,
I have the following setup.
A Web server which sends email from forms. The web server box runs sendmail (sorry!). This gets relayed through mail server which runs qmail. I'm looking to rewrite the headers at the qmail end to achieve the following:
All emails relayed to @xxx.com (which is remote) need to be Bcc'ed to another address.
I don't really want to do this with sendmail. Is there a way to do this with qmail?
Thanks for your help
--
Eric Bonharme , E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MotorTRAK Ltd ,AC Court, High Street ,Thames Ditton ,Surrey KT7 0SR Tel:+44 (20) 8335 2000 , Fax:+44 (20) 8335 2001 The information contained in this message is for the intended addressee only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended addressee, please delete this message and notify the sender; do not copy or distribute this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of MotorTRAK Limited or of any of its associated companies. No reliance may be placed on this message without written confirmation from an authorised representative of the company.
> All emails relayed to @xxx.com (which is remote) need to be Bcc'ed to > another address. You may catch all mail from the webserver (by it's IP address, see the RELAYCLIENT trick) and within the processing you may check if the envelope receiver matches the wanted domain. The RELAYCLIENT setup is described in the FAQ (look for FIXME). Regards, Frank
