Re: qmail logging tools

2000-02-03 Thread Bruce Guenter
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 12:31:53PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Out of curiosity, have you done any comparisons (performance or feature) > of qfilelog vs. multilog vs. cyclog? Well, let's try. Performance: - qfilelog, multilog, and cyclog all read messages from stdin and write to a single f

Re: qmail logging tools

2000-02-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 08:26:33AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > > If I remember correctly, Bruce Guenter wrote a patch to allow one of the > > loggers to do exactly this [...] > Close, but not quite. I just wrote a whole new logger that writes to a