Greetings:
My problem is that I have installed the spamcontrol patch but badrcptto
is not stopping incoming mails as I expected. Here are the details:
I am on OpenBSD 2.8. I have downloaded the spamcontrol patch and
successfully patched ./qmail-1.03 with only the following error
message
At 14:57 18/07/01, Lou Hevly wrote:
Greetings:
My problem is that I have installed the spamcontrol patch but
badrcptto
is not stopping incoming mails as I expected. Here are the details:
Answering my own question, it may be that because I originally
installed
qmail from an OpenBSD package
Hello everybody,
due to a bug in the logging E-mails with an originator having MAIL FROM:
with invalid MX-Record, SPAMCONTROL 1.4.0 may eventually yield a
qmail-smtpd crash (segmentation fault) depending on your logging scheme.
The bug was already introduced in version 1.1.0 but became apparent
Title: problems with the spamcontrol patch
Hi,
I have installed the spamcontrol patch to a base install of Q-Mail and most things seem to work fine.
However, there is one problem. When I put in an invalid senders (MAIL FROM) address to a SMTP connection, it closes the connection and does
Hi all,
I'm using Erwin Hoffmann spamcontrol patch and now I'm trying to bloc
addresses without @ without bloquing void addresses (mail from: )
which are used in bounce mails and can't be bloqued.
I've tried to put
*
!*@*
in the badmailpatterns but it blocs void addresses. Is there a way
)
Is it a bug in the spamcontrol patch or am I doing somthing wrong?
Thanks in advance
--
Bernat Ginard Lladó
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kaos.es
mx.domain.com ESMTP
helo
250 mx.domain.com
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
455 sorry, your envelope recipient is in my badrcptto list (#5.7.1)
Is it a bug in the spamcontrol patch or am I doing somthing wrong?
Thanks in advance
Hi,
thanks to all who commented my statements and perhaps my SPAMCONTROL patch.
(well, I live in Cologne and today is ... Rosenmontag).
Okay, back to the facts:
A) In the README I am referring a special situation, when QMAIL is used as
a RELAY Internet == INTRANET. My comments about Load
Hi,
the latast version of the SPAMCONTROL patch can be found here:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Erwin_Hoffmann/
cheers,
eh.
At 09:45 29.2.2000 -0300, you wrote:
Hello averyone,
How could I find the spamcontrol patch?
thanks in advance
--
-
Luís
Erwin Hoffmann writes:
Hi,
the latast version of the SPAMCONTROL patch can be found here:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Erwin_Hoffmann/
quoting from that file's README.spamcontrol file:
"Since QMAIL by contruction is an OPEN RELAY, some vulnerability may be
experi
Hi Russell,
I wrote in the README.spamcontrol:
"Since QMAIL by contruction is an OPEN RELAY, some vulnerability may be
experienced not in particular to the QMAIL system itself (which can
stand a heavy load), but for other MTAs which are flooded by
SPAM E-Mail. "
You're kidding, right?
== Am
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 06:24:39PM +0100, Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
qmail is by construction an open relay??
== See RFC 2505.
If you install qmail as per the included documentation, you won't be running an
open relay. How will looking at RFC 2505 convince anyone otherwise?
For the next version
-Original Message-
From: Erwin Hoffmann [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Russell Nelson
Subject: Re: SPAMCONTROL patch
Hi Russell,
I wrote in the README.spamcontrol:
"Since QMAIL by contruction is an
Erwin Hoffmann writes:
You're kidding, right?
== Am I?
Apparently.
qmail is by construction an open relay??
== See RFC 2505.
qmail, when installed according to the instructions, is not an open
relay. Of the recommendations in RFC2505, qmail meets all but 8, 9,
10. By "qmail", I
Hello averyone,
How could I find the spamcontrol patch?
thanks in advance
--
-
Luís Bezerra de A. Junior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SecrelNet Informática LTDA
Fortaleza - Ceará - Brasil
Fone: 021852882090
-
Hi,
I've just setup a new Qmail-1.03 server running tcpserver and the
SPAMCONTROL patch I received from Erwin Hoffmann. When I test my mailserver
at http://www.abuse.net/relay.html it still failes at Relay test 6... so it
seems the patch is not working. What could be wrong?
Erwin
Erwin van Kroonenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just setup a new Qmail-1.03 server running tcpserver and the
SPAMCONTROL patch I received from Erwin Hoffmann. When I test my mailserver
at http://www.abuse.net/relay.html it still failes at Relay test 6... so it
seems the patch
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Erwin van Kroonenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just setup a new Qmail-1.03 server running tcpserver and the
SPAMCONTROL patch I received from Erwin Hoffmann. When I test my
mailserver at http://www.abuse.net/relay.html it still failes at Relay
test 6
At 16:12 3.2.2000 +0100, you wrote:
When I test something like "mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" the spampatch
does work! :)
But are you sure I can pass all tests on abuse.net/relay.html with the
spampatch? Because that's why I got the patch...
Regards,
Erwin
Hi,
the RELAY test (according to
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:00:46 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Dr. Erwin Hoffmann" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QMAIL 1.03 SPAMCONTROL Patch
X-Attachments: E:\QMail\patches\spampatch.tgz;
Hi,
I would like to give my SPAMCONTROL patch for QMAIL 1.03 to the public.
Here's th
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:00:46 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Dr. Erwin Hoffmann" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QMAIL 1.03 SPAMCONTROL Patch
X-Attachments: E:\QMail\patches\spampatch.tgz;
Hi,
I would like to give my SPAMCONTROL patch for QMAIL 1.03 to the public.
Here's th
21 matches
Mail list logo
