ldap nfs question

2009-12-23 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
Hi, I am trying to deploy large e-mail system with qmail-ldap on Linux and maildir will be mounted by all backends from Netapp via NFS. In LDAP, there will be only one mailhost entry. All qmail-ldap backends will have same name and will run dovecot instance. So, all users can access to mailbox fr

Re: Future of Qmail-LDAP

2010-02-03 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
Hi Hugo, I have some problems with qmail-smtpd high load under many concurrent connection. I also stated details at http://marc.info/?l=qmail&m=126515210427322&w=2 Postfix handles big concurrent connections very well in SMTP level. As you know, more than %60-70 of spams are dropped at smtp level v

Re: Future of Qmail-LDAP

2010-02-03 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
using qmail :) and would like to continue using. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Hugo Monteiro wrote: > On 02/03/2010 12:03 PM, Ibrahim Harrani wrote: > >> Hi Hugo, >> >> I have some problems with qmail-smtpd high load under many concurrent >> connection. &g

Re: Future of Qmail-LDAP

2010-02-03 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
Hi, In this qmail test, CPU idle was almost zero. CPU time was mostly used by system. In the same test, if you set max connection to 100/200 via tcpserver and don't change anyhing in xstress side(still opening 600 connection). The load is quite low. So I decided that the reason is forking many

Re: Future of Qmail-LDAP

2010-02-03 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
Hi, I wonder, am I only the one who is experiencing this problem? Is there anyone has the same problem? Thanks. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Ibrahim Harrani wrote: > Hi, > > In this qmail test, CPU idle was almost zero. CPU time was mostly used by > system. > > In the

Re: Future of Qmail-LDAP

2010-02-03 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
hat qmail's queuing > process is quite disk I/O intensive. > > Do you see any increase of the local queue? > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Ibrahim Harrani > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wonder, am I only the one who is experiencing this probl

Re: Future of Qmail-LDAP

2010-02-03 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
DNS lookup? > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Ibrahim Harrani > wrote: > > Scott, > > > > There is no problem with I/O. the number of mail in queue is quite small. > > The main problem is CPU idle time. the CPU is idle %1-10 during the high > > concurrent

Re: looking for qmail-ldap-1.03-20060201-dovecot.v4.patch

2010-02-25 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
Hi Thomas, I have one copy of qmail-ldap-1.03-20060201-dovecot.v0.5.patch On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for qmail-ldap-1.03-20060201-dovecot.v4.patch patch posted on > qmail-ldap list in December 2007 > (http://marc.info/?l=qmail-ldap&m=119768286

qmail-ldap and GFS

2010-11-03 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
Hi, Currently, my domains and users are distributed to different mailhosts in my qmail ldap cluster. In this setup, If I one of the mailhost is down, the users can't access to mailbox on this server. To setup a redundant system, I would like to keep mailbox on GFS file system with multiple backen

Re: qmail-ldap and GFS

2010-11-03 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
es (one for every nfs server), with the user > distributed over the two shares, and one server acting as backup of the > other. > > In my actual config I don't have any problem. Only a clue, don't use > reiserfs for NFS exported filesystem, was my error. > >

qmail-ldap IPv6

2011-05-10 Thread Ibrahim Harrani
Hello, I could not find a IPv6 patch for qmail-ldap. Is there any progress about this feature? Thanks.