On Dec 16, 2005, at 11:58 AM, JuanJo Ciarlante wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:43:42PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Quoting Mark Farver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Qmail-ldap is a little simpler than most. Just backing up the files
under /var/qmail pretty much gets the critical stuff.
Backin
On Dec 8, 2005, at 12:27 PM, Luiz Morte wrote:
I have no problems with qmail-scanner and SMTPAUTH.
I've made some tests with sinscam because:
1. It was written in C (it supose to be faster);
2. I can put a spam_hits for domain (not works for me in my tests);
I'm still trying to find a scanne
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:33:02AM -0500, Zachary Kotlarek wrote:
This discussion about a way to exploit a "no you are not allowed to send
mail out of out comapany" problem is just stupid. Come on if I want to
send a mail out of your comapany and you give me acc
Bruno Negrão wrote:
Hi Krico,
A malicious user could send an e-mail to the outter world by setting
up an autoreply (mailReplyText+deliveryMode) and then forging an
e-mail from someone to himself.
I didn't understand this exploit. Can you explain it better?
But even with this condition, I th
Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
File is readable by root and qmaild, when it is owned by qmaild user or
when it is owned by root user, nofiles group and has 640 permissions.
-r 1 qmaild root 6 2005-05-11 20:46 ldappassword
or
-rw-r- 1 root nofiles 6 Sep 22 2004 ldappassword
rebind option
Mário A. Pinho wrote:
Are you using Debian? If yes, try to use the following to generate the key:
# cp /usr/lib/ssl/misc/CA.sh /usr/local/sbin/CA.sh
# vi /usr/local/sbin/CA.sh (find and change the following lines to)
DAYS="-days 7300" # 20 years
CATOP=/etc/ssl
# cd /etc/ssl
# vi openssl.cnf (find a
Mário A. Pinho wrote:
By the way ... have you ever applied the Claudio Jeker patch
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmail-ldap%40qmail-ldap.org/msg01956.html ?
Mário
Yep. I have Claudio's patches from 7/2 and 7/27, as well as yours.
Zach
I'm having trouble with TLS in 20040701+patches. I keep getting:
454 TLS not available: missing RSA private key (#4.3.0)
whenever I attempt to STARTTLS.
qmail-smtpd can read my certificate file, as evidenced in the log, and
I'm pretty sure that the certificate/key themselves are valid, bec
I'm putting together a build of qmail-ldap, and I just want to make
sure that I have all the necessary patches since the 20040701 release.
I've got one from July 2 for the smtpd SIGSEGV program, and one from
July 27 for the empty passwords problem. Are there any others? Or for
that matter, is t
p operating system, making it best by
number of copies sold.
On Jun 21, 2004, at 9:37 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
blah blah blah blah
thsi has been explained and discussed on teh regular qmail list to
death, there is no point in repeating it here.
* Zachary Kotlarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-0
I hate to contribute to this absurd thread, but I can't stand it.
First, let's stop with the name calling. Jumping from the mention (with
documentation, I might add) that MS is looking into SPF, to the fact
that you don't like their OS hardly makes your point seem more
credible. It also doesn't
On Jun 16, 2004, at 7:11 PM, Benson Wong wrote:
Hi,
qmail-smtp uses MAIL FROM to set the envelope sender. The Return-Path
mail header is set to MAIL FROM value automatically.
All my users SMTP AUTH to my relay server. Is there a way to make
qmail-smtp use the email address from LDAP of the authe
I'm looking to upgrade a system from qmail-ldap-20030501 to the current
build, and I'm just wondering what LDAP entries I need to bring up to
date. I know that the quota and deliveryMode entries have changed, do I
need to worry about anything else?
Thanks much,
Zach
--
As a
Speaking of which, is there any interest in say, a CVS repository for
qmail-ldap? It'd be really handy for stuff like this, and for those of
us that can't upgrade every month. It would allow you to grab some of
the new patches even if you can't upgrade to the newest qmail-ldap
version.
Zach
14 matches
Mail list logo
