I haven't tried it in this particular case, but using clamdscan instead of
clamscan has lessened the load by at least 75% of some our more heavy
hitting boxes, so calmscan isn't an option for me. :)
---
Jared Seipel - INetU Managed Hosting -
Hi,
I just installed netqmail-1.04 and qmail-scanner 1.20 and Clamav 0.65
qmail works fine withouth Qmail-Scanner when i installed qmail scanner and using
clamav every time my Email clients sending an email we're getting 451 qq Temporary
problem ive encountered this before and increasing
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Abraham Lincoln wrote:
Hi,
I just installed netqmail-1.04 and qmail-scanner 1.20 and Clamav 0.65
qmail works fine withouth Qmail-Scanner when i installed qmail scanner and using
clamav every time my Email clients sending an email we're getting 451 qq Temporary
Could the answer be to *not* use clamuko, and just use straight clamscan
instead?
jamie
Jared Seipel wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Abraham Lincoln wrote:
Hi,
I just installed netqmail-1.04 and qmail-scanner 1.20 and Clamav 0.65
qmail works fine withouth Qmail-Scanner when i installed qmail
