Quinn Comendant wrote:
I asked the techs at Rackspace (where we have our qmail toaster) how to, and if
they would recommend, setting up a caching name server. They replied to the
contrary:
Are they nuts? (They are sometimes.) But they have local-cachine nameservers they provide, which,
Secunia reported a highly critical vulnearbility in clamav:
http://secunia.com/advisories/22370/
The vulnerabilities are reported in version 0.88.4. Prior versions
may also be affected.
At qmailtoaster.com 0.88.4 is the version we offer for downloading. At
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/
we
Hi all!
Is there a easy way to limit bandwith of incoming (i don't intend to limit
my relay users, but it's not a bad idea) mail from SMTP?
Thanks in advance!
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Sánchez Martín;David
FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ORG:E2000 Financial Investments,
Would you please to post the upgrade procedure of the package?
Thank you so much
Ho
Erik Espinoza wrote:
This package will move in about 6 days. In the mean time just upgrade
from the devel site.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/17/06, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Secunia reported a highly
No match for WWW.RULESEMPORIUM.NET.
Iow, there is no such domain name..
Steve Huff wrote:
anyone else seeing some, um, nonstandard content at
http://www.rulesemporium.net/? I'm trying to figure out whether the web
server has simply been defaced or whether it's a DNS-level problem.
-steve
On Oct 17, 2006, at 8:03 AM, Steve Huff wrote:
anyone else seeing some, um, nonstandard content at http://
www.rulesemporium.net/? I'm trying to figure out whether the web
server has simply been defaced or whether it's a DNS-level problem.
upon further investigation it seems that the
Steve Huff wrote:
On Oct 17, 2006, at 8:03 AM, Steve Huff wrote:
anyone else seeing some, um, nonstandard content at
http://www.rulesemporium.net/? I'm trying to figure out whether the
web server has simply been defaced or whether it's a DNS-level problem.
upon further investigation it
Sorry, I seemed to be getting mail
out of order and very belatedly yesterday, then lots of things happened
all at once at the office... (we need our toaster implemented I think! lol - the
suits upstairs finally accepted the proposal to implement it! Yay!)
When I used the word "insulted",
1) Download the package:
wget
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/clamav-toaster-0.88.5-1.3.4.src.rpm
2) Compile the source rpm into a binary rpm:
rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt40 clamav-toaster-0.88.5-1.3.4.src.rpm
(be sure to put your distro in place of cnt40 if you are not using
centos
On Oct 17, 2006, at 5:08 AM, Steve Huff wrote:
upon further investigation it seems that the RulesEmporium folks
may have forgotten to renew their domain :(
Classically dumb - how sad.
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR
On Oct 17, 2006, at 5:03 AM, Steve Huff wrote:
anyone else seeing some, um, nonstandard content at http://
www.rulesemporium.net/? I'm trying to figure out whether the web
server has simply been defaced or whether it's a DNS-level problem.
You mean: http://www.rulesemporium.com/
On Oct 17, 2006, at 5:20 AM, Mattias Segerdahl wrote:
I was thinking about creating a script in php that would poll the
first account and copy to the 2nd when needed. But I figured there
has to be a better way or a pre-made util to do this?
I generally use a mail client, with rules (in my
I dont want an imap client running all the time, I need this to be
server side.
Harry Zink wrote:
On Oct 17, 2006, at 5:20 AM, Mattias Segerdahl wrote:
I was thinking about creating a script in php that would poll the
first account and copy to the 2nd when needed. But I figured there has
I was thinking about creating a script in php that would poll the
first account and copy to the 2nd when needed. But I figured there has
to be a better way or a pre-made util to do this?
I generally use a mail client, with rules (in my case, Apple Mail) to
perform such stuff, via IMAP).
Sorry, I thought you needed this as a one-up deal. Never mind..
On Oct 17, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Mattias Segerdahl wrote:
I dont want an imap client running all the time, I need this to be
server side.
Harry Zink wrote:
On Oct 17, 2006, at 5:20 AM, Mattias Segerdahl wrote:
I was thinking
On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:38 AM, geeknoob wrote:This is up to the moderators of course, but I think it's going to make things more difficult in the long run with cross-posting, people getting things 2 or 3 times (once in native language, once in English, and then maybe in a 3rd language), then people
HOla lista , quiero conocer sus experiencis con qmailtoaster y spamassasing, les cuento que estoy instalandolo en un isp con 1000 buzones pop3.y alrederdor de 60 dominios.Hoy realmente poseen mucho spam, se que no voy a poder filtrar el 100 % , pero me gustaria conocer sus sugerencias de como
Ariel wrote:
HOla lista , quiero conocer sus experiencis con qmailtoaster y
spamassasing,
les cuento que estoy instalandolo en un isp con 1000 buzones pop3.
y alrederdor de 60 dominios.
Hoy realmente poseen mucho spam, se que no voy a poder filtrar el 100 %
, pero me gustaria conocer sus
Today I noticed that when executing vdominfo that it was returning:
users: 2147483620
Which is incorrect as the domain in question only has 12175 users. So I
started to research the issue and found a thread that indicated it was
related to the .dir-control file. However I could not find this
Jim Scott wrote:
Today I noticed that when executing vdominfo that it was returning:
users: 2147483620
Which is incorrect as the domain in question only has 12175 users. So I
started to research the issue and found a thread that indicated it was
related to the .dir-control file. However
Currently I can see that the default install accepts all email sent to
QMAIL. It then evaluates after accepting if the user exists in the system.
If not generates a bounce message.
Is there something I can change so that these users are rejected at SMTP
time? I don't want the system to even
I found the following in the list archives from April'06, written by EE. Is
this something that can/should be included in the basic toaster?
How can I upgrade the mrtg config file to update the graphs with
smtp-ssl values?
Edit /usr/share/toaster/mrtg/qmailmrtg.cfg and add the following:
Yes, there are many tutorials on bandwidth shaping and Linux on the internet.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/17/06, David Sánchez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
Is there a easy way to limit bandwith of incoming (i don't intend to limit
my relay users, but it's not a bad idea) mail from SMTP?
We don't have a config for smtp-ssl since it is deprecated. As such,
we don't include qmailmrtg configuration for it either.
On 10/17/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found the following in the list archives from April'06, written by EE. Is
this something that can/should be included
Incorrect, but close.
1) download the src.rpm
2) compile
3) service qmail stop
4) rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
5) install the compiled binary
6) service qmail cdb (rebuild versions)
7) service qmail start
On 10/17/06, Warren (mailing lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Download the package:
Oh yeah, that right. SMTP uses TLS for secure connections. SSL is (can be)
used for POP3 and/or IMAP.
I'll try to get this security stuff updated on the wiki, once I get it
straight in my head. ;)
Thanks, EE.
Erik Espinoza wrote:
We don't have a config for smtp-ssl since it is deprecated. As
One of my relation have problem when sending email
to my email server, every email send from their domain (rejected-domain.com)
always rejected witherror message :
Error transferring to mail.mydomain.com;
SMTP Protocol Returned a Permanent Error 554 mail server permanently rejected
message
27 matches
Mail list logo
