On 1/22/07, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI: I found an issue with simscan this morning that y'all should be aware of.
Read below...
Has this bug been confirmed?
I've had a few reports of PDF attachments not been delivered to the
receiver which I
did not take that seriously as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you leaving the
toolchain on your servers (I guess I'm the paranoid type), or are you
compiling on one machine, and then installing the binaries on the
production server??
Compile on one host, test on another, in case of success move to the one
or two production
On 1/24/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had a few reports of PDF attachments not been delivered to the
receiver which I
Actually there were this kind of errors in clamd current log file:
2007-01-24 12:01:50.928674500 LibClamAV Warning: Error -5 inflating
PDF attachment
Hello
Any news on implementing the tcp server limit patch ?
or is JP testing it ?
-P
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To
Hi,
Was a bit busy will do this today.
JP
- Original Message -
From: Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 12:12 PM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] tcpserver limit patch
Hello
Any news on implementing the tcp server limit patch ?
Hi there,
I definitely agree with the idea that it is very hard to make users
change the port...
How do we do this?
How do we apply the patch?
Looks like i am yet a step by step do the necessary things kind of
admin.. :)
If you have time would you please reply?
Thanks, Regards
Devrim Vardar
Devrim Vardar wrote:
Hi there,
I definitely agree with the idea that it is very hard to make users
change the port...
It's not so hard, particularly if they can't send email because they're on a
dynamic IP address that's on a blocklist.
Keep in mind, port 25 still works for the most part.
Hi list,
I have bind and one of my client zone looks like that
$ORIGIN .
$TTL 3600
client.com IN SOA ns1.mydomain.com. support.mydomain.com (
10639xx ; serial
28800 ; refresh (8 hours) 7200
Thanks, JP.
BTW, do you know which qmail-toaster version I need for the rbl timeout patch?
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Hi,
Was a bit busy will do this today.
JP
- Original Message - From: Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday,
You need ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.3.src.rpm from the devel site.
JP
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] tcpserver limit patch
Thanks, JP.
BTW, do
Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
Hi list,
I have bind and one of my client zone looks like that
$ORIGIN .
$TTL 3600
client.com IN SOA ns1.mydomain.com. support.mydomain.com (
10639xx ; serial
28800 ;
Thanks JP, for everything you do.
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
You need ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.3.src.rpm from the devel site.
JP
- Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:40 PM
Just a heads up I guess. I haven't yet upgraded to the
courier-authlib-toaster-0.59
http://www.qmailtoaster.com/download/stable/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
thinking this package will get updated soon enough.
0.59.1
2007-01-16 Mr. Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* authldaplib.c
Several of my users, who are subscribed to internal mailing lists, keep
receiving the follow message from ezmlm:
--
BEGIN
--
Messages to you
Thank you too, I just feel it is good to do something back..
I applied the patch and did not find any problems.
Have not tested the new functionality, since I do not really need it.
But the rpm can be downloaded at
http://iserve01.i-serve.net/ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.4.src.rpm
For more info
Greetings, Eric.
24 ?? 2007 ?., 19:01:12 you have wrote:
P.S. Personally, I use dyndns.org to manage my domain records. It simplifies
DNS management tremendously, and provides reliability you just can't do
yourself.
Do you REALLY think that third-party general DNS service is anyway
more
Hy,
My host is mail.abc.com and I also host domain bcd.com and dcg.com, my
question is in what domain host file shall I place the spf record?
Thanks,
Razvan
Dan Herbon wrote:
Several of my users, who are subscribed to internal mailing lists,
keep receiving the follow message from ezmlm:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.server.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't
Hello
I tested the different functions
so far all seems to work good (didnt test DIEMSG though)
Thx JP
I used that patch a while ago and never had issues, so I am sure it will
work fine
maybe some docs for those who wanna use it could be helpful
just pasting infos from the .diff file
Hey Philip,
No prob..
Maybe you can add this info to the wiki?
JP
- Original Message -
From: Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] tcpserver limit patch
Hello
I tested the
Hi
Sure, I will add it tomorrow
if I remember how I added my other little tuts :)
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Hey Philip,
No prob..
Maybe you can add this info to the wiki?
JP
- Original Message - From: Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent:
I'm coming into this conversation a bit late. My clueless ISP has had
me offline since last wed.
Having nameservers outsourced is good if you have redundant servers out
there. If you have everything running on a single connection it does
not really matter if your dns stays up, you are already
There is always xname or granitecanyon for free dns hosting.
Erik
On 1/24/07, Vince Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm coming into this conversation a bit late. My clueless ISP has had
me offline since last wed.
Having nameservers outsourced is good if you have redundant servers out
Vince Callaway wrote:
Personally I think ALL hosting/ISP services should provide dynamic DNS.
The idea of static addresses should be reserved for data centers only.
Using a static address for a single website or mail server is a waste of
resources.
A bit offtop... nevertheless, I can agree with
24 matches
Mail list logo
