[qmailtoaster] 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient)

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to d_bbdel.redbottle.com.: >>> DATA <<< 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying denied. Unknown user. 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown <<< 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient) I'm sending an email from a mail client on the lo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have learned that the guys who (truly) know what the h#ll they're > doing are worth the 1-2 hour expense. I can't agree with this. I know a lot of network guy's who help out for low bucks so that they aren't doing everything for free, yet helping and making a little money on the side. When a b

Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread Warren Melnick
On Jan 30, 2008 2:29 PM, Michael Handiboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have learned that the guys who (truly) know what the h#ll they're > doing are worth the 1-2 hour expense. > > I'll be in touch when I have time to spend with my QMT box. > > --mh I do this for a few clients. I do not take on

Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> When I had looked at your system using my test domain, messages were > getting into Yahoo's bulk folder, so they were working (moving them to > the Inbox will eventually lead to you being able to deliver to Yahoo > correctly). I did not get around to looking at Hotmail. Does moving one allow the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread Michael Handiboe
Jake Vickers wrote: And don't be put off by time-stingy people. I am one of those people. I have other projects to work on and I don't get a lot of return off of QMT work. My donate buttons have yielded enough to pay for the domain name for 2 years. I have actual paying clients who come first

Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread Jake Vickers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, thanks for all of the private emails on this, I will reply, just caught up in some storage problems. It does seem that someone could make a few bucks at this while helping the community. Really, how does one choose someone though? What I'd like to see is a fla

RE: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First, thanks for all of the private emails on this, I will reply, just caught up in some storage problems. It does seem that someone could make a few bucks at this while helping the community. Really, how does one choose someone though? What I'd like to see is a flat rate. Say $50.00 for general

Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread Eric "Shubes"
Michael Handiboe wrote: > Jake Vickers wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> I wonder if someone would be interested in offering support for QMT? >> >> Erik Espinoza and I are both listed as QMT consultants on the wiki. > > I would be willing to pay for an hour or less, for one of you gurus to >

Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread Michael Handiboe
Jake Vickers wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if someone would be interested in offering support for QMT? Erik Espinoza and I are both listed as QMT consultants on the wiki. I would be willing to pay for an hour or less, for one of you gurus to log into my QMT server and just look i

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam folders

2008-01-30 Thread PakOgah
Cameron wrote: I'm still getting everything configured for my new Qmail Toaster and it looks like SA is automatically configured to be running. My question is how is it confiugured by defualt. Is it blocking, tagging, redirecting? What I would like is for it to tag, but then redirect to a spam

[qmailtoaster] Spam folders

2008-01-30 Thread Cameron
I'm still getting everything configured for my new Qmail Toaster and it looks like SA is automatically configured to be running. My question is how is it confiugured by defualt. Is it blocking, tagging, redirecting? What I would like is for it to tag, but then redirect to a spam folder for each