Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Bogdan Peptine
Thank you i will try that - Original Message - From: "Helmut Fritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 5:42 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication Yeah - I was thinking hot standby type server...not load balancing. -Original Message- From: Eric Shu

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread P.V.Anthony
Micah Abrams wrote: I have a similar setup using drbd and heartbeat between two toaster boxes. It does not give you any load sharing capability (as its purely an active/passive setup), but does provide you with the redundancy you're looking for. Here too. Currently have two partitions using dr

RE: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Helmut Fritz
Yeah - I was thinking hot standby type server...not load balancing. -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 7:34 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication Rsync could be difficult as it's on

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Eric Shubert
Rsync could be difficult as it's only one way (uni-directional). Unison might do the trick though (along with heartbeat). I don't know how Unison compares with DRBD. Helmut Fritz wrote: > An rsync setup may also work...with heartbeat. > > -Original Message- > From: Micah Abrams [mailto:[

RE: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Helmut Fritz
An rsync setup may also work...with heartbeat. -Original Message- From: Micah Abrams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 1:14 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication I have a similar setup using drbd and heartbeat between

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Micah Abrams
I have a similar setup using drbd and heartbeat between two toaster boxes. It does not give you any load sharing capability (as its purely an active/passive setup), but does provide you with the redundancy you're looking for. Micah On 4/6/08 12:14 PM, "Eric Shubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Eric Shubert
I don't think you'll get much benefit from 2 toasters w/out a storage server. I get a headache just thinking about how that would work. Short of that, I'd be sure to run raid (software raid works well, you don't need a raid card) to protect against disk failure. That's by far the most likely point

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Bogdan Peptine
Hello, I want to have fail over and load balance but i don't to use a storage server. If one of the mailservers is going down the ather one to server his job. I want to use only those two server without any ather storage. Thanks - Original Message - From: "Eric Shubert" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [qmailtoaster] Wierd Log Entry

2008-04-06 Thread Eric Shubert
I can only speculate what it might be. It's surely not something that normally comes from a toaster. It's something beyond the toaster's scope, perhaps even originating from a different host. If you'd like to contract me to find the culprit, you can contact me off list. Jack Martin wrote: > I do